@article {70243, title = {The organization of visual pathways in the Drosophila brain}, journal = {bioRxiv}, year = {2025}, month = {2025 Dec 26}, abstract = {

Visual systems across species transform photoreceptor inputs into diverse perceptual representations through hierarchical networks that extract features via parallel pathways. In Drosophila, the optic lobes are layered, retinotopic visual processing centers that contain two-thirds of the brain{\textquoteright}s neurons and support diverse visually guided behaviors. Although this architecture has long suggested hierarchical and parallel organization, a system-wide account of how behaviorally relevant visual features are routed and integrated across a complete visual system{\textemdash}in any animal{\textemdash}has remained elusive. The new male fly connectome now provides the synapse-level wiring needed to trace visual information from photoreceptors through the optic lobes and across the central brain. Applying a network-based analysis of information flow, we reveal a multi-layered architecture organized into distinct, functionally interpretable pathways. Using this framework to propagate signals through these pathways predicts receptive-field structure and feature selectivity consistent with physiological data, enabling large-scale functional annotation of thousands of neuron types. We find that distinct visual input channels are broadly distributed throughout the brain, yet converge in focal regions of feature specificity and acute spatial vision. Together, these analyses provide a neuron-level, connectome-based view of how a brain organizes and transforms visual input.

}, doi = {10.64898/2025.12.22.696097}, url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2025/12/26/2025.12.22.696097}, author = {Hoeller, Judith and Zhao, Arthur and Nern, Aljoscha and Rogers, Edward M and Romani, Sandro and Reiser, Michael B} } @article {70193, title = {Population Morphology Implies a Common Developmental Blueprint for Drosophila Motion Detectors}, journal = {bioRxiv}, year = {2025}, month = {2025 Nov 15}, abstract = {

Quantitative analysis of neuron morphology is essential in order to develop our understanding of circuit organisation and development. The recent acquisition of whole-brain electron microscopy-based (EM) reconstructions of the Drosophila melanogaster nervous system now provide the resolution needed to examine morphology at scale. Utilising these data, together with new computational tools, we extract and analyse the dendrites of all T4 and T5 neurons within one hemisphere (n \~ 6000).T4 and T5 neurons are the first uniquely direction-selective neurons in the visual pathway, and are classified into four subtypes (a,b,c, and d). Each subtype encodes one of four cardinal motion directions (up, down, forwards, backwards). The dendrites of these neurons form in two distinct neuropils, the Medulla (T4) and the Lobula (T5), and are asymmetrically oriented in a direction inverse to the direction of motion which they encode. However, their densely overlapping and compact arbours has made rigorous morphological quantification challenging. The presence of differences beyond their characteristic orientation, both between T4 and T5, as well as within subtypes, has remained poorly understood.Our analysis reveals a high degree of structural similarity across both types and subtypes. Particularly, measures of geometry and graph topology show only minor variation, with no consistent separation between T4 and T5, or their subtypes.These results indicate that, despite forming in different neuropils, and serving distinct motion directions, T4 and T5 dendrites follow closely aligned morphological patterns. This suggests that their arborization may be governed by shared developmental constraints and mechanisms.

}, doi = {10.1101/2025.11.15.688637}, url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2025/11/16/2025.11.15.688637}, author = {Drummond, Nikolas and Zhao, Arthur and Borst, Alexander} } @article {70155, title = {Sexual dimorphism in the complete connectome of the Drosophila male central nervous system}, journal = {bioRxiv}, year = {2025}, month = {2025 Oct 09}, abstract = {

Sex differences in behaviour exist across the animal kingdom, typically under strong genetic regulation. In Drosophila, previous work has shown that fruitless and doublesex transcription factors identify neurons driving sexually dimorphic behaviour. However, the organisation of dimorphic neurons into functional circuits remains unclear.We now present the connectome of the entire Drosophila male central nervous system. This contains 166,691 neurons spanning the brain and ventral nerve cord, fully proofread and comprehensively annotated including fruitless and doublesex expression and 11,691 cell types. By comparison with a previous female brain connectome, we provide the first comprehensive description of the differences between male and female brains to synaptic resolution. Of 7,319 cross-matched cell types in the central brain, 114 are dimorphic with an additional 262 male- and 69 female-specific (totalling 4.8\% of neurons in males and 2.4\% in females).This resource enables analysis of full sensory-to-motor circuits underlying complex behaviours as well as the impact of dimorphic elements. Sex-specific and dimorphic neurons are concentrated in higher brain centres while the sensory and motor periphery are largely isomorphic. Within higher centres, male-specific connections are organised into hotspots defined by male-specific neurons or the presence of male-specific arbours on neurons that are otherwise similar between sexes. Numerous circuit switches reroute sensory information to form conserved, antagonistic circuits controlling opposing behaviours.

}, doi = {10.1101/2025.10.09.680999}, url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2025/10/09/2025.10.09.680999}, author = {Berg, Stuart and Beckett, Isabella R and Costa, Marta and Schlegel, Philipp and Januszewski, Micha{\l} and Marin, Elizabeth C and Nern, Aljoscha and Preibisch, Stephan and Qiu, Wei and Takemura, Shin-ya and Fragniere, Alexandra MC and Champion, Andrew S and Adjavon, Diane-Yayra and Cook, Michael and Gkantia, Marina and Hayworth, Kenneth J and Huang, Gary B and Katz, William T and K{\"a}mpf, Florian and Lu, Zhiyuan and Ordish, Christopher and Paterson, Tyler and St{\"u}rner, Tomke and Trautman, Eric T and Whittle, Catherine R and Burnett, Laura E and Hoeller, Judith and Li, Feng and Loesche, Frank and Morris, Billy J and Pietzsch, Tobias and Pleijzier, Markus W and Silva, Valeria and Yin, Yijie and Ali, Iris and Badalamente, Griffin and Bates, Alexander Shakeel and Bogovic, John and Brooks, Paul and Cachero, Sebastian and Canino, Brandon S and Chaisrisawatsuk, Bhumpanya and Clements, Jody and Crowe, Arthur and de Haan Vicente, In{\^e}s and Dempsey, Georgia and Don{\`a}, Erika and dos Santos, M{\'a}rcia and Dreher, Marisa and Dunne, Christopher R and Eichler, Katharina and Finley-May, Samantha and Flynn, Miriam A and Hameed, Imran and Hopkins, Gary Patrick and Hubbard, Philip M and Kiassat, Ladann and Kovalyak, Julie and Lauchie, Shirley A and Leonard, Meghan and Lohff, Alanna and Longden, Kit D and Maldonado, Charli A and Mitletton, Myrto and Moitra, Ilina and Moon, Sung Soo and Mooney, Caroline and Munnelly, Eva J and Okeoma, Nneoma and Olbris, Donald J and Pai, Anika and Patel, Birava and Phillips, Emily M and Plaza, Stephen M and Richards, Alana and Rivas Salinas, Jennifer and Roberts, Ruair{\'\i} Jv and Rogers, Edward M and Scott, Ashley L and Scuderi, Louis A and Seenivasan, Pavithraa and Serratosa Capdevila, Laia and Smith, Claire and Svirskas, Rob and Takemura, Satoko and Tastekin, Ibrahim and Thomson, Alexander and Umayam, Lowell and Walsh, John J and Whittome, Holly and Xu, C Shan and Yakal, Emily A and Yang, Tansy and Zhao, Arthur and George, Reed and Jain, Viren and Jayaraman, Vivek and Korff, Wyatt and Meissner, Geoffrey W and Romani, Sandro and Funke, Jan and Knecht, Christopher and Saalfeld, Stephan and Scheffer, Louis K and Waddell, Scott and Card, Gwyneth M and Ribeiro, Carlos and Reiser, Michael B and Hess, Harald F and Rubin, Gerald M and Jefferis, Gregory Sxe} } @article {69138, title = {Connectomic reconstruction predicts visual features used for navigation.}, journal = {Nature}, volume = {634}, year = {2024}, month = {2024 Oct 02}, pages = {181-190}, abstract = {

Many animals use visual information to navigate, but how such information is encoded and integrated by the navigation system remains incompletely understood. In Drosophila melanogaster, EPG neurons in the central complex compute the heading direction by integrating visual input from ER neurons, which are part of the anterior visual pathway (AVP). Here we densely reconstruct all neurons in the AVP using electron-microscopy data. The AVP comprises four neuropils, sequentially linked by three major classes of neurons: MeTu neurons, which connect the medulla in the optic lobe to the small unit of the anterior optic tubercle (AOTUsu) in the central brain; TuBu neurons, which connect the AOTUsu to the bulb neuropil; and ER neurons, which connect the bulb to the EPG neurons. On the basis of morphologies, connectivity between neural classes and the locations of synapses, we identify distinct information channels that originate from four types of MeTu neurons, and we further divide these into ten subtypes according to the presynaptic connections in the medulla and the postsynaptic connections in the AOTUsu. Using the connectivity of the entire AVP and the dendritic fields of the MeTu neurons in the optic lobes, we infer potential visual features and the visual area from which any ER neuron receives input. We confirm some of these predictions physiologically. These results provide a strong foundation for understanding how distinct sensory features can be extracted and transformed across multiple processing stages to construct higher-order cognitive representations.

}, doi = {10.1038/s41586-024-07967-z}, url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07967-z}, author = {Garner, Dustin and Kind, Emil and Yuet Ha Lai, Jennifer and Nern, Aljoscha and Zhao, Arthur and Houghton, Lucy and Sancer, Gizem and Wolff, Tanya and Rubin, Gerald M and Wernet, Mathias F and Kim, Sung Soo} } @article {68566, title = {Synaptic gradients transform object location to action.}, journal = {Nature}, volume = {613}, year = {2023}, month = {2023 Jan 04}, pages = {534-42}, abstract = {

To survive, animals must convert sensory information into appropriate behaviours. Vision is a common sense for locating ethologically relevant stimuli and guiding motor responses. How circuitry converts object location in retinal coordinates to movement direction in body coordinates remains largely unknown. Here we show through behaviour, physiology, anatomy and connectomics in Drosophila that visuomotor transformation occurs by conversion of topographic maps formed by the dendrites of feature-detecting visual projection neurons (VPNs) into synaptic weight gradients of VPN outputs onto central brain neurons. We demonstrate how this gradient motif transforms the anteroposterior location of a visual looming stimulus into the fly{\textquoteright}s directional escape. Specifically, we discover that two neurons postsynaptic to a looming-responsive VPN type promote opposite takeoff directions. Opposite synaptic weight gradients onto these neurons from looming VPNs in different visual field regions convert localized looming threats into correctly oriented escapes. For a second looming-responsive VPN type, we demonstrate graded responses along the dorsoventral axis. We show that this synaptic gradient motif generalizes across all 20 primary VPN cell types and most often arises without VPN axon topography. Synaptic gradients may thus be a general mechanism for conveying spatial features of sensory information into directed motor outputs.

}, issn = {1476-4687}, doi = {10.1038/s41586-022-05562-8}, author = {Dombrovski, Mark and Peek, Martin Y and Park, Jin-Yong and Vaccari, Andrea and Sumathipala, Marissa and Morrow, Carmen and Breads, Patrick and Zhao, Arthur and Kurmangaliyev, Yerbol Z and Sanfilippo, Piero and Rehan, Aadil and Polsky, Jason and Alghailani, Shada and Tenshaw, Emily and Namiki, Shigehiro and Zipursky, S Lawrence and Card, Gwyneth M} } @article {67843, title = {Synaptic targets of photoreceptors specialized to detect color and skylight polarization in .}, journal = {eLife}, volume = {10}, year = {2021}, month = {2021 Dec 16}, abstract = {

Color and polarization provide complementary information about the world and are detected by specialized photoreceptors. However, the downstream neural circuits that process these distinct modalities are incompletely understood in any animal. Using electron microscopy, we have systematically reconstructed the synaptic targets of the photoreceptors specialized to detect color and skylight polarization in Drosophila, and we have used light microscopy to confirm many of our findings. We identified known and novel downstream targets that are selective for different wavelengths or polarized light, and followed their projections to other areas in the optic lobes and the central brain. Our results revealed many synapses along the photoreceptor axons between brain regions, new pathways in the optic lobes, and spatially segregated projections to central brain regions. Strikingly, photoreceptors in the polarization-sensitive dorsal rim area target fewer cell types, and lack strong connections to the lobula, a neuropil involved in color processing. Our reconstruction identifies shared wiring and modality-specific specializations for color and polarization vision, and provides a comprehensive view of the first steps of the pathways processing color and polarized light inputs.

}, issn = {2050-084X}, doi = {10.7554/eLife.71858}, author = {Kind, Emil and Longden, Kit D and Nern, Aljoscha and Zhao, Arthur and Sancer, Gizem and Flynn, Miriam A and Laughland, Connor W and Gezahegn, Bruck and Ludwig, Henrique Df and Thomson, Alex G and Obrusnik, Tessa and Alarc{\'o}n, Paula G and Dionne, Heather and Bock, Davi D and Rubin, Gerald M and Reiser, Michael B and Wernet, Mathias F} } @article {65847, title = {Spatial readout of visual looming in the central brain of Drosophila.}, journal = {eLife}, volume = {9}, year = {2020}, month = {2020 Nov 18}, abstract = {

Visual systems can exploit spatial correlations in the visual scene by using retinotopy. However, retinotopy is often lost, such as when visual pathways are integrated with other sensory modalities. How is spatial information processed outside of strictly visual brain areas? Here, we focused on visual looming responsive LC6 cells in , a population whose dendrites collectively cover the visual field, but whose axons form a single glomerulus-a structure without obvious retinotopic organization-in the central brain. We identified multiple cell types downstream of LC6 in the glomerulus and found that they more strongly respond to looming in different portions of the visual field, unexpectedly preserving spatial information. Through EM reconstruction of all LC6 synaptic inputs to the glomerulus, we found that LC6 and downstream cell types form circuits within the glomerulus that enable spatial readout of visual features and contralateral suppression-mechanisms that transform visual information for behavioral control.

}, issn = {2050-084X}, doi = {10.7554/eLife.57685}, author = {Morimoto, Mai M and Nern, Aljoscha and Zhao, Arthur and Rogers, Edward M and Wong, Allan and Isaacson, Mathew D and Bock, Davi and Rubin, Gerald M and Reiser, Michael B} }