@article {46049, title = {Adaptation to background light enables contrast coding at rod bipolar cell synapses.}, journal = {Neuron}, volume = {81}, year = {2014}, month = {2014 Jan 22}, pages = {388-401}, abstract = {

Rod photoreceptors contribute to vision over an \~{} 6-log-unit range of light intensities. The wide dynamic range of rod vision is thought to depend upon light intensity-dependent switching between two parallel pathways linking rods to ganglion cells: a rod {\textrightarrow} rod bipolar (RB) cell pathway that operates at dim backgrounds and a rod {\textrightarrow} cone {\textrightarrow} cone bipolar cell pathway that operates at brighter backgrounds. We evaluated this conventional model of rod vision by recording rod-mediated light responses from ganglion and AII amacrine cells and by recording RB-mediated synaptic currents from AII amacrine cells in mouse retina. Contrary to the conventional model, we found that the RB pathway functioned at backgrounds sufficient to activate the rod {\textrightarrow} cone pathway. As background light intensity increased, the RB{\textquoteright}s role changed from encoding the absorption of single photons to encoding contrast modulations around mean luminance. This transition is explained by the intrinsic dynamics of transmission from RB synapses.

}, keywords = {2-Amino-5-phosphonovalerate, Adaptation, Ocular, Animals, Biophysics, Computer Simulation, Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists, Glucosamine 6-Phosphate N-Acetyltransferase, Green Fluorescent Proteins, In Vitro Techniques, Light, Mice, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Knockout, Mice, Transgenic, Models, Neurological, Patch-Clamp Techniques, Quinoxalines, Retinal Bipolar Cells, Retinal Rod Photoreceptor Cells, Synapses, Visual Pathways}, issn = {1097-4199}, doi = {10.1016/j.neuron.2013.10.054}, author = {Ke, Jiang-Bin and Wang, Yanbin V and Borghuis, Bart G and Cembrowski, Mark S and Riecke, Hermann and Kath, William L and Demb, Jonathan B and Singer, Joshua H} } @article {6895, title = {Excitatory synaptic inputs to mouse on-off direction-selective retinal ganglion cells lack direction tuning.}, journal = {The Journal of Neuroscience : the Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience}, volume = {34}, year = {2014}, month = {2014 Mar 12}, pages = {3976-81}, abstract = {

Direction selectivity represents a fundamental visual computation. In mammalian retina, On-Off direction-selective ganglion cells (DSGCs) respond strongly to motion in a preferred direction and weakly to motion in the opposite, null direction. Electrical recordings suggested three direction-selective (DS) synaptic mechanisms: DS GABA release during null-direction motion from starburst amacrine cells (SACs) and DS acetylcholine and glutamate release during preferred direction motion from SACs and bipolar cells. However, evidence for DS acetylcholine and glutamate release has been inconsistent and at least one bipolar cell type that contacts another DSGC (On-type) lacks DS release. Here, whole-cell recordings in mouse retina showed that cholinergic input to On-Off DSGCs lacked DS, whereas the remaining (glutamatergic) input showed apparent DS. Fluorescence measurements with the glutamate biosensor intensity-based glutamate-sensing fluorescent reporter (iGluSnFR) conditionally expressed in On-Off DSGCs showed that glutamate release in both On- and Off-layer dendrites lacked DS, whereas simultaneously recorded excitatory currents showed apparent DS. With GABA-A receptors blocked, both iGluSnFR signals and excitatory currents lacked DS. Our measurements rule out DS release from bipolar cells onto On-Off DSGCs and support a theoretical model suggesting that apparent DS excitation in voltage-clamp recordings results from inadequate voltage control of DSGC dendrites during null-direction inhibition. SAC GABA release is the apparent sole source of DS input onto On-Off DSGCs.

}, issn = {1529-2401}, doi = {10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5017-13.2014}, author = {Park, Silvia J H and Kim, In-Jung and Looger, Loren L and Demb, Jonathan B and Borghuis, Bart G} } @article {45182, title = {Kainate receptors mediate signaling in both transient and sustained OFF bipolar cell pathways in mouse retina.}, journal = {Journal of Neuroscience}, volume = {34}, year = {2014}, month = {2014 Apr 30}, pages = {6128-39}, abstract = {

A fundamental question in sensory neuroscience is how parallel processing is implemented at the level of molecular and circuit mechanisms. In the retina, it has been proposed that distinct OFF cone bipolar cell types generate fast/transient and slow/sustained pathways by the differential expression of AMPA- and kainate-type glutamate receptors, respectively. However, the functional significance of these receptors in the intact circuit during light stimulation remains unclear. Here, we measured glutamate release from mouse bipolar cells by two-photon imaging of a glutamate sensor (iGluSnFR) expressed on postsynaptic amacrine and ganglion cell dendrites. In both transient and sustained OFF layers, cone-driven glutamate release from bipolar cells was blocked by antagonists to kainate receptors but not AMPA receptors. Electrophysiological recordings from bipolar and ganglion cells confirmed the essential role of kainate receptors for signaling in both transient and sustained OFF pathways. Kainate receptors mediated responses to contrast modulation up to 20 Hz. Light-evoked responses in all mouse OFF bipolar pathways depend on kainate, not AMPA, receptors.

}, keywords = {Action Potentials, Animals, Drug Interactions, Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists, Female, Glutamic Acid, Hexamethonium, Light, Male, Mice, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Nicotinic Antagonists, Patch-Clamp Techniques, Photic Stimulation, Propionates, Receptors, Kainic Acid, Retina, Retinal Bipolar Cells, Signal Transduction, Visual Pathways}, issn = {1529-2401}, doi = {10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4941-13.2014}, author = {Borghuis, Bart G and Looger, Loren L and Tomita, Susumu and Demb, Jonathan B} } @article {6128, title = {An optimized fluorescent probe for visualizing glutamate neurotransmission.}, journal = {Nature Methods}, volume = {10}, year = {2013}, month = {2013 Feb}, pages = {162-70}, abstract = {

We describe an intensity-based glutamate-sensing fluorescent reporter (iGluSnFR) with signal-to-noise ratio and kinetics appropriate for in vivo imaging. We engineered iGluSnFR in vitro to maximize its fluorescence change, and we validated its utility for visualizing glutamate release by neurons and astrocytes in increasingly intact neurological systems. In hippocampal culture, iGluSnFR detected single field stimulus-evoked glutamate release events. In pyramidal neurons in acute brain slices, glutamate uncaging at single spines showed that iGluSnFR responds robustly and specifically to glutamate in situ, and responses correlate with voltage changes. In mouse retina, iGluSnFR-expressing neurons showed intact light-evoked excitatory currents, and the sensor revealed tonic glutamate signaling in response to light stimuli. In worms, glutamate signals preceded and predicted postsynaptic calcium transients. In zebrafish, iGluSnFR revealed spatial organization of direction-selective synaptic activity in the optic tectum. Finally, in mouse forelimb motor cortex, iGluSnFR expression in layer V pyramidal neurons revealed task-dependent single-spine activity during running.

}, keywords = {Animals, Astrocytes, Biosensing Techniques, Caenorhabditis elegans, Calcium Signaling, Escherichia coli Proteins, Excitatory Postsynaptic Potentials, Fluorescent Dyes, Glutamic Acid, Green Fluorescent Proteins, Hippocampus, Mice, Motor Cortex, Neurons, Photic Stimulation, Pyramidal Cells, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Retina, Signal-To-Noise Ratio, Synaptic Transmission, Zebrafish}, issn = {1548-7105}, doi = {10.1038/nmeth.2333}, author = {Marvin, Jonathan S and Borghuis, Bart G and Tian, Lin and Cichon, Joseph and Harnett, Mark T and Akerboom, Jasper and Gordus, Andrew and Renninger, Sabine L. and Chen, Tsai-Wen and Bargmann, Cornelia I and Orger, Michael B. and Schreiter, Eric R and Demb, Jonathan B and Gan, Wen-Biao and Hires, S Andrew and Looger, Loren L} } @article {6129, title = {Two-photon imaging of nonlinear glutamate release dynamics at bipolar cell synapses in the mouse retina.}, journal = {The Journal of Neuroscience : The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience}, volume = {33}, year = {2013}, month = {2013 Jul 3}, pages = {10972-85}, abstract = {

Alpha/Y-type retinal ganglion cells encode visual information with a receptive field composed of nonlinear subunits. This nonlinear subunit structure enhances sensitivity to patterns composed of high spatial frequencies. The Y-cell{\textquoteright}s subunits are the presynaptic bipolar cells, but the mechanism for the nonlinearity remains incompletely understood. We investigated the synaptic basis of the subunit nonlinearity by combining whole-cell recording of mouse Y-type ganglion cells with two-photon fluorescence imaging of a glutamate sensor (iGluSnFR) expressed on their dendrites and throughout the inner plexiform layer. A control experiment designed to assess iGluSnFR{\textquoteright}s dynamic range showed that fluorescence responses from Y-cell dendrites increased proportionally with simultaneously recorded excitatory current. Spatial resolution was sufficient to readily resolve independent release at intermingled ON and OFF bipolar terminals. iGluSnFR responses at Y-cell dendrites showed strong surround inhibition, reflecting receptive field properties of presynaptic release sites. Responses to spatial patterns located the origin of the Y-cell nonlinearity to the bipolar cell output, after the stage of spatial integration. The underlying mechanism differed between OFF and ON pathways: OFF synapses showed transient release and strong rectification, whereas ON synapses showed relatively sustained release and weak rectification. At ON synapses, the combination of fast release onset with slower release offset explained the nonlinear response of the postsynaptic ganglion cell. Imaging throughout the inner plexiform layer, we found transient, rectified release at the central-most levels, with increasingly sustained release near the borders. By visualizing glutamate release in real time, iGluSnFR provides a powerful tool for characterizing glutamate synapses in intact neural circuits.

}, issn = {1529-2401}, doi = {10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1241-13.2013}, author = {Borghuis, Bart G and Marvin, Jonathan S and Looger, Loren L and Demb, Jonathan B} } @article {46047, title = {A synaptic mechanism for retinal adaptation to luminance and contrast.}, journal = {Journal of Neuroscience}, volume = {31}, year = {2011}, month = {2011 Jul 27}, pages = {11003-15}, abstract = {

The gain of signaling in primary sensory circuits is matched to the stimulus intensity by the process of adaptation. Retinal neural circuits adapt to visual scene statistics, including the mean (background adaptation) and the temporal variance (contrast adaptation) of the light stimulus. The intrinsic properties of retinal bipolar cells and synapses contribute to background and contrast adaptation, but it is unclear whether both forms of adaptation depend on the same cellular mechanisms. Studies of bipolar cell synapses identified synaptic mechanisms of gain control, but the relevance of these mechanisms to visual processing is uncertain because of the historical focus on fast, phasic transmission rather than the tonic transmission evoked by ambient light. Here, we studied use-dependent regulation of bipolar cell synaptic transmission evoked by small, ongoing modulations of membrane potential (V(M)) in the physiological range. We made paired whole-cell recordings from rod bipolar (RB) and AII amacrine cells in a mouse retinal slice preparation. Quasi-white noise voltage commands modulated RB V(M) and evoked EPSCs in the AII. We mimicked changes in background luminance or contrast, respectively, by depolarizing the V(M) or increasing its variance. A linear systems analysis of synaptic transmission showed that increasing either the mean or the variance of the presynaptic V(M) reduced gain. Further electrophysiological and computational analyses demonstrated that adaptation to mean potential resulted from both Ca channel inactivation and vesicle depletion, whereas adaptation to variance resulted from vesicle depletion alone. Thus, background and contrast adaptation apparently depend in part on a common synaptic mechanism.

}, keywords = {Adaptation, Physiological, Amacrine Cells, Animals, Biophysical Phenomena, Biophysics, Calcium, Contrast Sensitivity, Electric Stimulation, Excitatory Postsynaptic Potentials, Female, In Vitro Techniques, Lighting, Male, Mice, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Models, Neurological, Numerical Analysis, Computer-Assisted, Patch-Clamp Techniques, Photic Stimulation, Presynaptic Terminals, Retina, Retinal Bipolar Cells, Synaptic Transmission}, issn = {1529-2401}, doi = {10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2631-11.2011}, author = {Jarsky, Tim and Cembrowski, Mark and Logan, Stephen M and Kath, William L and Riecke, Hermann and Demb, Jonathan B and Singer, Joshua H} }