@article {69994, title = {A Multimodal Adaptive Optical Microscope For In Vivo Imaging from Molecules to Organisms}, journal = {bioRxiv}, year = {2025}, month = {2025 Jun 16}, abstract = {

Understanding biological systems requires observing features and processes across vast spatial and temporal scales, spanning nanometers to centimeters and milliseconds to days, often using multiple imaging modalities within complex native microenvironments. Yet, achieving this comprehensive view is challenging because microscopes optimized for specific tasks typically lack versatility due to inherent optical and sample handling trade-offs, and frequently suffer performance degradation from sample-induced optical aberrations in multicellular contexts. Here, we present MOSAIC, a reconfigurable microscope that integrates multiple advanced imaging techniques including light-sheet, label-free, super-resolution, and multi-photon, all equipped with adaptive optics. MOSAIC enables non-invasive imaging of subcellular dynamics in both cultured cells and live multicellular organisms, nanoscale mapping of molecular architectures across millimeter-scale expanded tissues, and structural/functional neural imaging within live mice. MOSAIC facilitates correlative studies across biological scales within the same specimen, providing an integrated platform for broad biological investigation.

Preprint:\ https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2025/06/13/2025.06.02.657494

}, doi = {10.1101/2025.06.02.657494}, url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2025/06/13/2025.06.02.657494}, author = {Fu, Tian-Ming and Liu, Gaoxiang and Milkie, Daniel E. and Ruan, Xiongtao and G{\"o}rlitz, Frederik and Shi, Yu and Ferro, Valentina and Divekar, Nikita S. and Wang, Wei and York, Harrison M. and Kilic, Velat and Mueller, Matthew and Liang, Yajie and Daugird, Timothy A. and Gacha-Garay, Maria J. and Larkin, Kathryn A. and Adikes, Rebecca C. and Harrison, Nathaniel and Shirazinejad, Cyna and Williams, Samara and Nourse, Jamison L. and Sheu, Shu-Hsien and Gao, Liang and Li, Tongchao and Mondal, Chandrani and Achour, Kemal and Hercule, Wilmene and Stabley, Daniel and Emmerich, Kevin and Dong, Peng and Drubin, David and Liu, Zhe J. and Clapham, David and Mumm, Jeff S. and Koyama, Minoru and Killilea, Alison and Bravo-Cordero, Jose Javier and Keene, C. Dirk and Luo, Liqun and Kirchhausen, Tom and Pathak, Medha M. and Arumugam, Senthil and Nunez, James K. and Gao, Ruixuan and Matus, David Q. and Martin, Benjamin L. and Swinburne, Ian A. and Betzig, Eric and Legant, Wesley R. and Upadhyayula, Srigokul} } @article {69534, title = {Molecular and cellular mechanisms of teneurin signaling in synaptic partner matching.}, journal = {Cell}, year = {2024}, month = {2024 Jul 03}, abstract = {

In developing brains, axons exhibit remarkable precision in selecting synaptic partners among many non-partner cells. Evolutionarily conserved teneurins are transmembrane proteins that instruct synaptic partner matching. However, how intracellular signaling pathways execute teneurins{\textquoteright} functions is unclear. Here, we use in situ proximity labeling to obtain the intracellular interactome of a teneurin (Ten-m) in the Drosophila brain. Genetic interaction studies using quantitative partner matching assays in both olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs) and projection neurons (PNs) reveal a common pathway: Ten-m binds to and negatively regulates a RhoGAP, thus activating the Rac1 small GTPases to promote synaptic partner matching. Developmental analyses with single-axon resolution identify the cellular mechanism of synaptic partner matching: Ten-m signaling promotes local F-actin levels and stabilizes ORN axon branches that contact partner PN dendrites. Combining spatial proteomics and high-resolution phenotypic analyses, this study advanced our understanding of both cellular and molecular mechanisms of synaptic partner matching.

}, issn = {1097-4172}, doi = {10.1016/j.cell.2024.06.022}, author = {Xu, Chuanyun and Li, Zhuoran and Lyu, Cheng and Hu, Yixin and McLaughlin, Colleen N and Wong, Kenneth Kin Lam and Xie, Qijing and Luginbuhl, David J and Li, Hongjie and Udeshi, Namrata D and Svinkina, Tanya and Mani, D R and Han, Shuo and Li, Tongchao and Li, Yang and Guajardo, Ricardo and Ting, Alice Y and Carr, Steven A and Li, Jiefu and Luo, Liqun} } @article {68675, title = {Origin of wiring specificity in an olfactory map revealed by neuron type-specific, time-lapse imaging of dendrite targeting.}, journal = {eLife}, volume = {12}, year = {2023}, month = {2023 Mar 28}, abstract = {

How does wiring specificity of neural maps emerge during development? Formation of the adult olfactory glomerular map begins with patterning of projection neuron (PN) dendrites at the early pupal stage. To better understand the origin of wiring specificity of this map, we created genetic tools to systematically characterize dendrite patterning across development at PN type-specific resolution. We find that PNs use lineage and birth order combinatorially to build the initial dendritic map. Specifically, birth order directs dendrite targeting in rotating and binary manners for PNs of the anterodorsal and lateral lineages, respectively. Two-photon- and adaptive optical lattice light-sheet microscope-based time-lapse imaging reveals that PN dendrites initiate active targeting with direction-dependent branch stabilization on the timescale of seconds. Moreover, PNs that are used in both the larval and adult olfactory circuits prune their larval-specific dendrites and re-extend new dendrites simultaneously to facilitate timely olfactory map organization. Our work highlights the power and necessity of type-specific neuronal access and time-lapse imaging in identifying wiring mechanisms that underlie complex patterns of functional neural maps.

}, issn = {2050-084X}, doi = {10.7554/eLife.85521}, author = {Wong, Kenneth Kin Lam and Li, Tongchao and Fu, Tian-Ming and Liu, Gaoxiang and Lyu, Cheng and Kohani, Sayeh and Xie, Qijing and Luginbuhl, David J and Upadhyayula, Srigokul and Betzig, Eric and Luo, Liqun} } @article {68419, title = {Transcription factor Acj6 controls dendrite targeting via a combinatorial cell-surface code.}, journal = {Neuron}, volume = {110}, year = {2022}, month = {07/2022}, pages = {2299-2314.e8}, abstract = {

Transcription factors specify the fate and connectivity of developing neurons. We investigate how a lineage-specific transcription factor, Acj6, controls the precise dendrite targeting of Drosophila olfactory projection neurons (PNs) by regulating the expression of cell-surface proteins. Quantitative cell-surface proteomic profiling of wild-type and acj6 mutant PNs in intact developing brains, and a proteome-informed genetic screen identified PN surface proteins that execute Acj6-regulated wiring decisions. These include canonical cell adhesion molecules and proteins previously not associated with wiring, such as Piezo, whose mechanosensitive ion channel activity is dispensable for its function in PN dendrite targeting. Comprehensive genetic analyses revealed that Acj6 employs unique sets of cell-surface proteins in different PN types for dendrite targeting. Combined expression of Acj6 wiring executors rescued acj6 mutant phenotypes with higher efficacy and breadth than expression of individual executors. Thus, Acj6 controls wiring specificity of different neuron types by specifying distinct combinatorial expression of cell-surface executors.

}, keywords = {Animals, Dendrites, Drosophila, Drosophila Proteins, Ion Channels, Membrane Proteins, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Olfactory Pathways, Olfactory Receptor Neurons, POU Domain Factors, Proteomics, Transcription Factors}, issn = {1097-4199}, doi = {10.1016/j.neuron.2022.04.026}, author = {Xie, Qijing and Li, Jiefu and Li, Hongjie and Udeshi, Namrata D and Svinkina, Tanya and Orlin, Daniel and Kohani, Sayeh and Guajardo, Ricardo and Mani, D R and Xu, Chuanyun and Li, Tongchao and Han, Shuo and Wei, Wei and Shuster, S Andrew and Luginbuhl, David J and Quake, Stephen R and Murthy, Swetha E and Ting, Alice Y and Carr, Steven A and Luo, Liqun} } @article {67737, title = {Cellular bases of olfactory circuit assembly revealed by systematic time-lapse imaging.}, journal = {Cell}, volume = {184}, year = {2021}, month = {2021 Sep 30}, pages = {5107}, abstract = {

Neural circuit assembly features simultaneous targeting of numerous neuronal processes from constituent neuron types, yet the dynamics is poorly understood. Here, we use the Drosophila olfactory circuit to investigate dynamic cellular processes by which olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs) target axons precisely to specific glomeruli in the ipsi- and contralateral antennal lobes. Time-lapse imaging of individual axons from 30 ORN types revealed a rich diversity in extension speed, innervation timing, and ipsilateral branch locations and identified that ipsilateral targeting occurs via stabilization of transient interstitial branches. Fast imaging using adaptive optics-corrected lattice light-sheet microscopy showed that upon approaching target, many ORN types exhibiting "exploring branches" consisted of parallel microtubule-based terminal branches emanating from an F-actin-rich hub. Antennal nerve ablations uncovered essential roles for bilateral axons in contralateral target selection and for ORN axons to facilitate dendritic refinement of postsynaptic partner neurons. Altogether, these observations provide cellular bases for wiring specificity establishment.

}, issn = {1097-4172}, doi = {10.1016/j.cell.2021.08.030}, author = {Li, Tongchao and Fu, Tian-Ming and Wong, Kenneth Kin Lam and Li, Hongjie and Xie, Qijing and Luginbuhl, David J and Wagner, Mark J and Betzig, Eric and Luo, Liqun} } @article {68425, title = {Single-cell transcriptomes of developing and adult olfactory receptor neurons in Drosophila}, journal = {Elife}, volume = {10}, year = {2021}, month = {02/2021}, abstract = {

Recognition of environmental cues is essential for the survival of all organisms. Transcriptional changes occur to enable the generation and function of the neural circuits underlying sensory perception. To gain insight into these changes, we generated single-cell transcriptomes of olfactory- (ORNs), thermo-, and hygro-sensory neurons at an early developmental and adult stage using single-cell and single-nucleus RNA sequencing. We discovered that ORNs maintain expression of the same olfactory receptors across development. Using receptor expression and computational approaches, we matched transcriptomic clusters corresponding to anatomically and physiologically defined neuron types across multiple developmental stages. We found that cell-type-specific transcriptomes partly reflected axon trajectory choices in development and sensory modality in adults. We uncovered stage-specific genes that could regulate the wiring and sensory responses of distinct ORN types. Collectively, our data reveal transcriptomic features of sensory neuron biology and provide a resource for future studies of their development and physiology.

}, keywords = {Animals, Drosophila melanogaster, Drosophila Proteins, Female, Male, Olfactory Receptor Neurons, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Single-Cell Analysis, Smell, Transcriptome}, issn = {2050-084X}, doi = {10.7554/eLife.63856}, author = {McLaughlin, Colleen N and Brbi{\'c}, Maria and Xie, Qijing and Li, Tongchao and Horns, Felix and Kolluru, Sai Saroja and Kebschull, Justus M and Vacek, David and Xie, Anthony and Li, Jiefu and Jones, Robert C and Leskovec, Jure and Quake, Stephen R and Luo, Liqun and Li, Hongjie} } @article {68426, title = {Temporal evolution of single-cell transcriptomes of olfactory projection neurons.}, journal = {Elife}, volume = {10}, year = {2021}, month = {01/2021}, abstract = {

Neurons undergo substantial morphological and functional changes during development to form precise synaptic connections and acquire specific physiological properties. What are the underlying transcriptomic bases? Here, we obtained the single-cell transcriptomes of olfactory projection neurons (PNs) at four developmental stages. We decoded the identity of 21 transcriptomic clusters corresponding to 20 PN types and developed methods to match transcriptomic clusters representing the same PN type across development. We discovered that PN transcriptomes reflect unique biological processes unfolding at each stage-neurite growth and pruning during metamorphosis at an early pupal stage; peaked transcriptomic diversity during olfactory circuit assembly at mid-pupal stages; and neuronal signaling in adults. At early developmental stages, PN types with adjacent birth order share similar transcriptomes. Together, our work reveals principles of cellular diversity during brain development and provides a resource for future studies of neural development in PNs and other neuronal types.

}, keywords = {Animals, Drosophila melanogaster, Neurites, Olfactory Nerve, Single-Cell Analysis, Time Factors, Transcriptome}, issn = {2050-084X}, doi = {10.7554/eLife.63450}, author = {Xie, Qijing and Brbi{\'c}, Maria and Horns, Felix and Kolluru, Sai Saroja and Jones, Robert C and Li, Jiefu and Reddy, Anay R and Xie, Anthony and Kohani, Sayeh and Li, Zhuoran and McLaughlin, Colleen N and Li, Tongchao and Xu, Chuanyun and Vacek, David and Luginbuhl, David J and Leskovec, Jure and Quake, Stephen R and Luo, Liqun and Li, Hongjie} } @article {68429, title = {Cell-Surface Proteomic Profiling in the Fly Brain Uncovers Wiring Regulators.}, journal = {Cell}, volume = {180}, year = {2020}, month = {01/2020}, pages = {373-386.e15}, abstract = {

Molecular interactions at the cellular interface mediate organized assembly of single cells into tissues and, thus, govern the development and physiology of multicellular organisms. Here, we developed a cell-type-specific, spatiotemporally resolved approach to profile cell-surface proteomes in intact tissues. Quantitative profiling of cell-surface proteomes of Drosophila olfactory projection neurons (PNs) in pupae and adults revealed global downregulation of wiring molecules and upregulation of synaptic molecules in the transition from developing to mature PNs. A proteome-instructed in\ vivo screen identified 20 cell-surface molecules regulating neural circuit assembly, many of which belong to evolutionarily conserved protein families not previously linked to neural development. Genetic analysis further revealed that the lipoprotein receptor LRP1 cell-autonomously controls PN dendrite targeting, contributing to the formation of a precise olfactory map. These findings highlight the power of temporally resolved in situ cell-surface proteomic profiling in discovering regulators of brain wiring.

}, keywords = {Animals, Axons, Brain, Dendrites, Drosophila melanogaster, Drosophila Proteins, Gene Expression Profiling, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Membrane Proteins, Neurogenesis, Olfactory Nerve, Olfactory Pathways, Olfactory Receptor Neurons, Proteomics, Receptors, Lipoprotein, Smell}, issn = {1097-4172}, doi = {10.1016/j.cell.2019.12.029}, author = {Li, Jiefu and Han, Shuo and Li, Hongjie and Udeshi, Namrata D and Svinkina, Tanya and Mani, D R and Xu, Chuanyun and Guajardo, Ricardo and Xie, Qijing and Li, Tongchao and Luginbuhl, David J and Wu, Bing and McLaughlin, Colleen N and Xie, Anthony and Kaewsapsak, Pornchai and Quake, Stephen R and Carr, Steven A and Ting, Alice Y and Luo, Liqun} } @article {68428, title = {Single-Cell Transcriptomes Reveal Diverse Regulatory Strategies for Olfactory Receptor Expression and Axon Targeting.}, journal = {Curr Biol}, volume = {30}, year = {2020}, month = {04/2020}, pages = {1189-1198.e5}, abstract = {

The regulatory mechanisms by which neurons coordinate their physiology and connectivity are not well understood. The Drosophila olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs) provide an excellent system to investigate this question. Each ORN type expresses a unique olfactory receptor, or a combination thereof, and sends their axons to a stereotyped glomerulus. Using single-cell RNA sequencing, we identified 33 transcriptomic clusters for ORNs and mapped 20 to their glomerular types, demonstrating that transcriptomic clusters correspond well with anatomically and physiologically defined ORN types. Each ORN type expresses hundreds of transcription factors. Transcriptome-instructed genetic analyses revealed that (1) one broadly expressed transcription factor (Acj6) only regulates olfactory receptor expression in one ORN type and only wiring specificity in another type, (2) one type-restricted transcription factor (Forkhead) only regulates receptor expression, and (3) another type-restricted transcription factor (Unplugged) regulates both events. Thus, ORNs utilize diverse strategies and complex regulatory networks to coordinate their physiology and connectivity.

}, keywords = {Animals, Axons, Drosophila melanogaster, Drosophila Proteins, Forkhead Transcription Factors, Homeodomain Proteins, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Olfactory Receptor Neurons, POU Domain Factors, Receptors, Odorant, Single-Cell Analysis, Smell, Transcriptome}, issn = {1879-0445}, doi = {10.1016/j.cub.2020.01.049}, author = {Li, Hongjie and Li, Tongchao and Horns, Felix and Li, Jiefu and Xie, Qijing and Xu, Chuanyun and Wu, Bing and Kebschull, Justus M and McLaughlin, Colleen N and Kolluru, Sai Saroja and Jones, Robert C and Vacek, David and Xie, Anthony and Luginbuhl, David J and Quake, Stephen R and Luo, Liqun} } @article {68432, title = { Stepwise wiring of the Drosophila olfactory map requires specific Plexin B levels}, journal = {Elife}, volume = {7}, year = {2018}, month = {08/2018}, abstract = {

The precise assembly of a neural circuit involves many consecutive steps. The conflict between a limited number of wiring molecules and the complexity of the neural network impels each molecule to execute multiple functions at different steps. Here, we examined the cell-type specific distribution of endogenous levels of axon guidance receptor Plexin B (PlexB) in the developing antennal lobe, the first olfactory processing center in . We found that different classes of olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs) express PlexB at different levels in two wiring steps - axonal trajectory choice and subsequent target selection. In line with its temporally distinct patterns, the proper levels of PlexB control both steps in succession. Genetic interactions further revealed that the effect of high-level PlexB is antagonized by its canonical partner Sema2b. Thus, PlexB plays a multifaceted role in instructing the assembly of the olfactory circuit through temporally-regulated expression patterns and expression level-dependent effects.

}, keywords = {Animals, Arthropod Antennae, Axons, Drosophila melanogaster, Drosophila Proteins, Models, Biological, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Olfactory Receptor Neurons, Receptors, Cell Surface, Smell}, issn = {2050-084X}, doi = {10.7554/eLife.39088}, author = {Li, Jiefu and Guajardo, Ricardo and Xu, Chuanyun and Wu, Bing and Li, Hongjie and Li, Tongchao and Luginbuhl, David J and Xie, Xiaojun and Luo, Liqun} } @article {68437, title = {Classifying Drosophila Olfactory Projection Neuron Subtypes by Single-Cell RNA Sequencing.}, journal = {Cell}, volume = {171}, year = {2017}, month = {11/2017}, pages = {1206-1220.e22}, abstract = {

The definition of neuronal type and how it relates to the transcriptome are open questions. Drosophila olfactory projection neurons (PNs) are among the best-characterized neuronal types: different PN classes target dendrites to distinct olfactory glomeruli, while PNs of the same class exhibit indistinguishable anatomical and physiological properties. Using single-cell RNA sequencing, we comprehensively characterized the transcriptomes of most PN classes and unequivocally mapped transcriptomes to specific olfactory function for six classes. Transcriptomes of\ closely related PN classes exhibit the largest differences during circuit assembly but become indistinguishable in adults, suggesting that neuronal subtype diversity peaks during development. Transcription factors and cell-surface molecules are the most differentially expressed genes between classes and are highly informative in encoding cell identity, enabling us to identify a new lineage-specific transcription factor that instructs PN dendrite targeting. These findings establish that neuronal transcriptomic identity corresponds with anatomical and physiological identity defined by connectivity and function.

}, keywords = {Animals, Brain, Cluster Analysis, Dendrites, Drosophila melanogaster, Gene Expression Profiling, Neurons, Olfactory Bulb, Organ Specificity, Pupa, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Single-Cell Analysis, Transcription Factors}, issn = {1097-4172}, doi = {10.1016/j.cell.2017.10.019}, author = {Li, Hongjie and Horns, Felix and Wu, Bing and Xie, Qijing and Li, Jiefu and Li, Tongchao and Luginbuhl, David J and Quake, Stephen R and Luo, Liqun} }