@article {48645, title = {Building bridges between cellular and molecular structural biology.}, journal = {eLife}, volume = {6}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 Jul 06}, abstract = {

The integration of cellular and molecular structural data is key to understanding the function of macromolecular assemblies and complexes in their in vivo context. Here we report on the outcomes of a workshop that discussed how to integrate structural data from a range of public archives. The workshop identified two main priorities: the development of tools and file formats to support segmentation (that is, the decomposition of a three-dimensional volume into regions that can be associated with defined objects), and the development of tools to support the annotation of biological structures.

}, issn = {2050-084X}, doi = {10.7554/eLife.25835}, author = {Patwardhan, Ardan and Brandt, Robert and Butcher, Sarah J and Collinson, Lucy and Gault, David and Gr{\"u}newald, Kay and Hecksel, Corey and Huiskonen, Juha T and Iudin, Andrii and Jones, Martin L and Korir, Paul K and Koster, Abraham J and Lagerstedt, Ingvar and Lawson, Catherine L and Mastronarde, David and McCormick, Matthew and Parkinson, Helen and Rosenthal, Peter B and Saalfeld, Stephan and Saibil, Helen R and Sarntivijai, Sirarat and Solanes Valero, Irene and Subramaniam, Sriram and Swedlow, Jason R and Tudose, Ilinca and Winn, Martyn and Kleywegt, Gerard J} } @article {6330, title = {Outcome of the first electron microscopy validation task force meeting.}, journal = {Structure}, volume = {20}, year = {2012}, month = {2012 Feb 8}, pages = {205-14}, abstract = {

This Meeting Review describes the proceedings and conclusions from the inaugural meeting of the Electron Microscopy Validation Task Force organized by the Unified Data Resource for 3DEM (http://www.emdatabank.org) and held at Rutgers University in New Brunswick, NJ on September 28 and 29, 2010. At the workshop, a group of scientists involved in collecting electron microscopy data, using the data to determine three-dimensional electron microscopy (3DEM) density maps, and building molecular models into the maps explored how to assess maps, models, and other data that are deposited into the Electron Microscopy Data Bank and Protein Data Bank public data archives. The specific recommendations resulting from the workshop aim to increase the impact of 3DEM in biology and medicine.

}, keywords = {Animals, Databases, Electron, Factual, Guidelines as Topic, Humans, Information Storage and Retrieval, Macromolecular Substances, Microscopy, Models, Molecular, Molecular Conformation, Molecular Sequence Annotation}, issn = {1878-4186}, doi = {10.1016/j.str.2011.12.014}, author = {Henderson, Richard and Sali, Andrej and Baker, Matthew L and Carragher, Bridget and Devkota, Batsal and Downing, Kenneth H and Egelman, Edward H and Feng, Zukang and Frank, Joachim and Grigorieff, Nikolaus and Jiang, Wen and Ludtke, Steven J and Medalia, Ohad and Penczek, Pawel A and Rosenthal, Peter B and Rossmann, Michael G and Schmid, Michael F and Schr{\"o}der, Gunnar F and Steven, Alasdair C and Stokes, David L and Westbrook, John D and Wriggers, Willy and Yang, Huanwang and Young, Jasmine and Berman, Helen M and Chiu, Wah and Kleywegt, Gerard J and Lawson, Catherine L} } @article {6332, title = {Tilt-pair analysis of images from a range of different specimens in single-particle electron cryomicroscopy.}, journal = {Journal of Molecular Biology}, volume = {413}, year = {2011}, month = {2011 Nov 11}, pages = {1028-46}, abstract = {

The comparison of a pair of electron microscope images recorded at different specimen tilt angles provides a powerful approach for evaluating the quality of images, image-processing procedures, or three-dimensional structures. Here, we analyze tilt-pair images recorded from a range of specimens with different symmetries and molecular masses and show how the analysis can produce valuable information not easily obtained otherwise. We show that the accuracy of orientation determination of individual single particles depends on molecular mass, as expected theoretically since the information in each particle image increases with molecular mass. The angular uncertainty is less than 1{\textdegree} for particles of high molecular mass (\ 50 MDa), several degrees for particles in the range 1-5 MDa, and tens of degrees for particles below 1 MDa. Orientational uncertainty may be the major contributor to the effective temperature factor (B-factor) describing contrast loss and therefore the maximum resolution of a structure determination. We also made two unexpected observations. Single particles that are known to be flexible showed a wider spread in orientation accuracy, and the orientations of the largest particles examined changed by several degrees during typical low-dose exposures. Smaller particles presumably also reorient during the exposure; hence, specimen movement is a second major factor that limits resolution. Tilt pairs thus enable assessment of orientation accuracy, map quality, specimen motion, and conformational heterogeneity. A convincing tilt-pair parameter plot, where 60\% of the particles show a single cluster around the expected tilt axis and tilt angle, provides confidence in a structure determined using electron cryomicroscopy.

}, keywords = {Adenosine Triphosphatases, Animals, beta-Galactosidase, Cattle, Computer-Assisted, Cryoelectron Microscopy, Image Processing, Rotavirus, Virion, Yeasts}, issn = {1089-8638}, doi = {10.1016/j.jmb.2011.09.008}, author = {Henderson, Richard and Chen, Shaoxia and Chen, James Z and Grigorieff, Nikolaus and Passmore, Lori A and Ciccarelli, Luciano and Rubinstein, John L and Crowther, R Anthony and Stewart, Phoebe L and Rosenthal, Peter B} }