@article {70323, title = {Endocytome profiling uncovers cell-surface protein dynamics underlying neuronal connectivity.}, journal = {Neuron}, year = {2026}, month = {2026 Mar 12}, abstract = {

Endocytosis actively remodels the neuronal surface proteome to drive diverse cellular processes, yet its global extent and effects on neural circuit development have defied comprehensive interrogation. Here, we introduce endocytome profiling: a systematic, cell-type-specific approach for mapping cell-surface protein (CSP) dynamics in situ. Quantitative proteomic analysis of developing Drosophila olfactory receptor neuron (ORN) axons generated an endocytic atlas comprising over 1,000 proteins and revealed the extent to which the cell-surface proteome is remodeled to meet developmental demands. Targeted interrogation of a junctional CSP showed that its endosome-to-surface ratio is precisely balanced to enable developmental axon pruning while preserving mature axon integrity. Multi-omic integration uncovered widespread transcellular signaling and identified a growth factor secreted by neighboring neurons to direct ORN axon targeting via endocytic regulation of its receptor. Endocytome profiling provides unprecedented access to cell-surface proteome dynamics and offers a platform to dissect proteome-scale remodeling across diverse cell types and contexts.

}, issn = {1097-4199}, doi = {10.1016/j.neuron.2026.01.027}, url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2026.01.027}, author = {McLaughlin, Colleen N and Ji, Hui and Dong, Katherine X and Xu, Chuanyun and Wong, Kenneth Kin Lam and Li, Zhuoran and Luginbuhl, David J and Xu, Charles and Lyu, Cheng and Qin, Wei and Li, Jiefu and Udeshi, Namrata D and Carr, Steven A and Ting, Alice Y and Luo, Liqun} } @article {69534, title = {Molecular and cellular mechanisms of teneurin signaling in synaptic partner matching.}, journal = {Cell}, year = {2024}, month = {2024 Jul 03}, abstract = {

In developing brains, axons exhibit remarkable precision in selecting synaptic partners among many non-partner cells. Evolutionarily conserved teneurins are transmembrane proteins that instruct synaptic partner matching. However, how intracellular signaling pathways execute teneurins{\textquoteright} functions is unclear. Here, we use in situ proximity labeling to obtain the intracellular interactome of a teneurin (Ten-m) in the Drosophila brain. Genetic interaction studies using quantitative partner matching assays in both olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs) and projection neurons (PNs) reveal a common pathway: Ten-m binds to and negatively regulates a RhoGAP, thus activating the Rac1 small GTPases to promote synaptic partner matching. Developmental analyses with single-axon resolution identify the cellular mechanism of synaptic partner matching: Ten-m signaling promotes local F-actin levels and stabilizes ORN axon branches that contact partner PN dendrites. Combining spatial proteomics and high-resolution phenotypic analyses, this study advanced our understanding of both cellular and molecular mechanisms of synaptic partner matching.

}, issn = {1097-4172}, doi = {10.1016/j.cell.2024.06.022}, author = {Xu, Chuanyun and Li, Zhuoran and Lyu, Cheng and Hu, Yixin and McLaughlin, Colleen N and Wong, Kenneth Kin Lam and Xie, Qijing and Luginbuhl, David J and Li, Hongjie and Udeshi, Namrata D and Svinkina, Tanya and Mani, D R and Han, Shuo and Li, Tongchao and Li, Yang and Guajardo, Ricardo and Ting, Alice Y and Carr, Steven A and Li, Jiefu and Luo, Liqun} } @article {68418, title = {In situ cell-type-specific cell-surface proteomic profiling in mice.}, journal = {Neuron}, year = {2022}, month = {10/2022}, abstract = {

Cell-surface proteins (CSPs) mediate intercellular communication throughout the lives of multicellular organisms. However, there are no generalizable methods for quantitative CSP profiling in specific cell types in vertebrate tissues. Here, we present in situ cell-surface proteome extraction by extracellular labeling (iPEEL), a proximity labeling method in mice that enables spatiotemporally precise labeling of cell-surface proteomes in a cell-type-specific environment in native tissues for discovery proteomics. Applying iPEEL to developing and mature cerebellar Purkinje cells revealed differential enrichment in CSPs with post-translational protein processing and synaptic functions in the developing and mature cell-surface proteomes, respectively. A proteome-instructed in\ vivo loss-of-function screen identified a critical, multifaceted role for Armh4 in Purkinje cell dendrite morphogenesis. Armh4 overexpression also disrupts dendrite morphogenesis; this effect requires its conserved cytoplasmic domain and is augmented by disrupting its endocytosis. Our results highlight the utility of CSP profiling in native mammalian tissues for identifying regulators of cell-surface signaling.

}, issn = {1097-4199}, doi = {10.1016/j.neuron.2022.09.025}, author = {Shuster, S Andrew and Li, Jiefu and Chon, URee and Sinantha-Hu, Miley C and Luginbuhl, David J and Udeshi, Namrata D and Carey, Dominique Kiki and Takeo, Yukari H and Xie, Qijing and Xu, Chuanyun and Mani, D R and Han, Shuo and Ting, Alice Y and Carr, Steven A and Luo, Liqun} } @article {68419, title = {Transcription factor Acj6 controls dendrite targeting via a combinatorial cell-surface code.}, journal = {Neuron}, volume = {110}, year = {2022}, month = {07/2022}, pages = {2299-2314.e8}, abstract = {

Transcription factors specify the fate and connectivity of developing neurons. We investigate how a lineage-specific transcription factor, Acj6, controls the precise dendrite targeting of Drosophila olfactory projection neurons (PNs) by regulating the expression of cell-surface proteins. Quantitative cell-surface proteomic profiling of wild-type and acj6 mutant PNs in intact developing brains, and a proteome-informed genetic screen identified PN surface proteins that execute Acj6-regulated wiring decisions. These include canonical cell adhesion molecules and proteins previously not associated with wiring, such as Piezo, whose mechanosensitive ion channel activity is dispensable for its function in PN dendrite targeting. Comprehensive genetic analyses revealed that Acj6 employs unique sets of cell-surface proteins in different PN types for dendrite targeting. Combined expression of Acj6 wiring executors rescued acj6 mutant phenotypes with higher efficacy and breadth than expression of individual executors. Thus, Acj6 controls wiring specificity of different neuron types by specifying distinct combinatorial expression of cell-surface executors.

}, keywords = {Animals, Dendrites, Drosophila, Drosophila Proteins, Ion Channels, Membrane Proteins, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Olfactory Pathways, Olfactory Receptor Neurons, POU Domain Factors, Proteomics, Transcription Factors}, issn = {1097-4199}, doi = {10.1016/j.neuron.2022.04.026}, author = {Xie, Qijing and Li, Jiefu and Li, Hongjie and Udeshi, Namrata D and Svinkina, Tanya and Orlin, Daniel and Kohani, Sayeh and Guajardo, Ricardo and Mani, D R and Xu, Chuanyun and Li, Tongchao and Han, Shuo and Wei, Wei and Shuster, S Andrew and Luginbuhl, David J and Quake, Stephen R and Murthy, Swetha E and Ting, Alice Y and Carr, Steven A and Luo, Liqun} } @article {68426, title = {Temporal evolution of single-cell transcriptomes of olfactory projection neurons.}, journal = {Elife}, volume = {10}, year = {2021}, month = {01/2021}, abstract = {

Neurons undergo substantial morphological and functional changes during development to form precise synaptic connections and acquire specific physiological properties. What are the underlying transcriptomic bases? Here, we obtained the single-cell transcriptomes of olfactory projection neurons (PNs) at four developmental stages. We decoded the identity of 21 transcriptomic clusters corresponding to 20 PN types and developed methods to match transcriptomic clusters representing the same PN type across development. We discovered that PN transcriptomes reflect unique biological processes unfolding at each stage-neurite growth and pruning during metamorphosis at an early pupal stage; peaked transcriptomic diversity during olfactory circuit assembly at mid-pupal stages; and neuronal signaling in adults. At early developmental stages, PN types with adjacent birth order share similar transcriptomes. Together, our work reveals principles of cellular diversity during brain development and provides a resource for future studies of neural development in PNs and other neuronal types.

}, keywords = {Animals, Drosophila melanogaster, Neurites, Olfactory Nerve, Single-Cell Analysis, Time Factors, Transcriptome}, issn = {2050-084X}, doi = {10.7554/eLife.63450}, author = {Xie, Qijing and Brbi{\'c}, Maria and Horns, Felix and Kolluru, Sai Saroja and Jones, Robert C and Li, Jiefu and Reddy, Anay R and Xie, Anthony and Kohani, Sayeh and Li, Zhuoran and McLaughlin, Colleen N and Li, Tongchao and Xu, Chuanyun and Vacek, David and Luginbuhl, David J and Leskovec, Jure and Quake, Stephen R and Luo, Liqun and Li, Hongjie} } @article {68429, title = {Cell-Surface Proteomic Profiling in the Fly Brain Uncovers Wiring Regulators.}, journal = {Cell}, volume = {180}, year = {2020}, month = {01/2020}, pages = {373-386.e15}, abstract = {

Molecular interactions at the cellular interface mediate organized assembly of single cells into tissues and, thus, govern the development and physiology of multicellular organisms. Here, we developed a cell-type-specific, spatiotemporally resolved approach to profile cell-surface proteomes in intact tissues. Quantitative profiling of cell-surface proteomes of Drosophila olfactory projection neurons (PNs) in pupae and adults revealed global downregulation of wiring molecules and upregulation of synaptic molecules in the transition from developing to mature PNs. A proteome-instructed in\ vivo screen identified 20 cell-surface molecules regulating neural circuit assembly, many of which belong to evolutionarily conserved protein families not previously linked to neural development. Genetic analysis further revealed that the lipoprotein receptor LRP1 cell-autonomously controls PN dendrite targeting, contributing to the formation of a precise olfactory map. These findings highlight the power of temporally resolved in situ cell-surface proteomic profiling in discovering regulators of brain wiring.

}, keywords = {Animals, Axons, Brain, Dendrites, Drosophila melanogaster, Drosophila Proteins, Gene Expression Profiling, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Membrane Proteins, Neurogenesis, Olfactory Nerve, Olfactory Pathways, Olfactory Receptor Neurons, Proteomics, Receptors, Lipoprotein, Smell}, issn = {1097-4172}, doi = {10.1016/j.cell.2019.12.029}, author = {Li, Jiefu and Han, Shuo and Li, Hongjie and Udeshi, Namrata D and Svinkina, Tanya and Mani, D R and Xu, Chuanyun and Guajardo, Ricardo and Xie, Qijing and Li, Tongchao and Luginbuhl, David J and Wu, Bing and McLaughlin, Colleen N and Xie, Anthony and Kaewsapsak, Pornchai and Quake, Stephen R and Carr, Steven A and Ting, Alice Y and Luo, Liqun} } @article {68428, title = {Single-Cell Transcriptomes Reveal Diverse Regulatory Strategies for Olfactory Receptor Expression and Axon Targeting.}, journal = {Curr Biol}, volume = {30}, year = {2020}, month = {04/2020}, pages = {1189-1198.e5}, abstract = {

The regulatory mechanisms by which neurons coordinate their physiology and connectivity are not well understood. The Drosophila olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs) provide an excellent system to investigate this question. Each ORN type expresses a unique olfactory receptor, or a combination thereof, and sends their axons to a stereotyped glomerulus. Using single-cell RNA sequencing, we identified 33 transcriptomic clusters for ORNs and mapped 20 to their glomerular types, demonstrating that transcriptomic clusters correspond well with anatomically and physiologically defined ORN types. Each ORN type expresses hundreds of transcription factors. Transcriptome-instructed genetic analyses revealed that (1) one broadly expressed transcription factor (Acj6) only regulates olfactory receptor expression in one ORN type and only wiring specificity in another type, (2) one type-restricted transcription factor (Forkhead) only regulates receptor expression, and (3) another type-restricted transcription factor (Unplugged) regulates both events. Thus, ORNs utilize diverse strategies and complex regulatory networks to coordinate their physiology and connectivity.

}, keywords = {Animals, Axons, Drosophila melanogaster, Drosophila Proteins, Forkhead Transcription Factors, Homeodomain Proteins, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Olfactory Receptor Neurons, POU Domain Factors, Receptors, Odorant, Single-Cell Analysis, Smell, Transcriptome}, issn = {1879-0445}, doi = {10.1016/j.cub.2020.01.049}, author = {Li, Hongjie and Li, Tongchao and Horns, Felix and Li, Jiefu and Xie, Qijing and Xu, Chuanyun and Wu, Bing and Kebschull, Justus M and McLaughlin, Colleen N and Kolluru, Sai Saroja and Jones, Robert C and Vacek, David and Xie, Anthony and Luginbuhl, David J and Quake, Stephen R and Luo, Liqun} } @article {68430, title = {Transsynaptic Fish-lips signaling prevents misconnections between nonsynaptic partner olfactory neurons.}, journal = {Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A}, volume = {116}, year = {2019}, month = {08/2019}, pages = {16068-16073}, abstract = {

Our understanding of the mechanisms of neural circuit assembly is far from complete. Identification of wiring molecules with novel mechanisms of action will provide insights into how complex and heterogeneous neural circuits assemble during development. In the olfactory system, 50 classes of olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs) make precise synaptic connections with 50 classes of partner projection neurons (PNs). Here, we performed an RNA interference screen for cell surface molecules and identified the leucine-rich repeat-containing transmembrane protein known as Fish-lips (Fili) as a novel wiring molecule in the assembly of the olfactory circuit. Fili contributes to the precise axon and dendrite targeting of a small subset of ORN and PN classes, respectively. Cell-type-specific expression and genetic analyses suggest that Fili sends a transsynaptic repulsive signal to neurites of nonpartner classes that prevents their targeting to inappropriate glomeruli in the antennal lobe.

}, keywords = {Animals, Axons, Dendrites, Drosophila melanogaster, Drosophila Proteins, Leucine-Rich Repeat Proteins, Membrane Proteins, Mutation, Olfactory Receptor Neurons, Phenotype, Proteins, Signal Transduction, Synapses}, issn = {1091-6490}, doi = {10.1073/pnas.1905832116}, author = {Xie, Qijing and Wu, Bing and Li, Jiefu and Xu, Chuanyun and Li, Hongjie and Luginbuhl, David J and Wang, Xin and Ward, Alex and Luo, Liqun} } @article {68432, title = { Stepwise wiring of the Drosophila olfactory map requires specific Plexin B levels}, journal = {Elife}, volume = {7}, year = {2018}, month = {08/2018}, abstract = {

The precise assembly of a neural circuit involves many consecutive steps. The conflict between a limited number of wiring molecules and the complexity of the neural network impels each molecule to execute multiple functions at different steps. Here, we examined the cell-type specific distribution of endogenous levels of axon guidance receptor Plexin B (PlexB) in the developing antennal lobe, the first olfactory processing center in . We found that different classes of olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs) express PlexB at different levels in two wiring steps - axonal trajectory choice and subsequent target selection. In line with its temporally distinct patterns, the proper levels of PlexB control both steps in succession. Genetic interactions further revealed that the effect of high-level PlexB is antagonized by its canonical partner Sema2b. Thus, PlexB plays a multifaceted role in instructing the assembly of the olfactory circuit through temporally-regulated expression patterns and expression level-dependent effects.

}, keywords = {Animals, Arthropod Antennae, Axons, Drosophila melanogaster, Drosophila Proteins, Models, Biological, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Olfactory Receptor Neurons, Receptors, Cell Surface, Smell}, issn = {2050-084X}, doi = {10.7554/eLife.39088}, author = {Li, Jiefu and Guajardo, Ricardo and Xu, Chuanyun and Wu, Bing and Li, Hongjie and Li, Tongchao and Luginbuhl, David J and Xie, Xiaojun and Luo, Liqun} }