@article {64917, title = {A neural circuit encoding the experience of copulation in female Drosophila.}, journal = {Neuron}, volume = {102}, year = {2019}, month = {2019 Apr 26}, pages = {1025}, abstract = {

Female behavior changes profoundly after mating. In Drosophila, the mechanisms underlying the long-term changes led by seminal products have been extensively studied. However, the effect of the sensory component of copulation on the female{\textquoteright}s internal state and behavior remains elusive. We pursued this question by dissociating the effect of coital sensory inputs from those of male ejaculate. We found that the sensory inputs of copulation cause a reduction of post-coital receptivity in females, referred to as the "copulation effect." We identified three layers of a neural circuit underlying this phenomenon. Abdominal neurons expressing the mechanosensory channel Piezo convey the signal of copulation to female-specific ascending neurons, LSANs, in the ventral nerve cord. LSANs relay this information to neurons expressing myoinhibitory peptides in the brain. We hereby provide a\ neural mechanism by which the experience of\ copulation facilitates females encoding their mating\ status, thus adjusting behavior to optimize reproduction.

}, issn = {1097-4199}, doi = {10.1016/j.neuron.2019.04.009}, author = {Shao, Lisha and Chung, Phuong and Wong, Allan and Siwanowicz, Igor and Kent, Clement F and Long, Xi and Heberlein, Ulrike} } @article {49013, title = {Repetitive aggressive encounters generate a long-lasting internal state in Drosophila melanogaster males.}, journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America}, volume = {115}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 Jan 16}, pages = {1099-104}, abstract = {

Multiple studies have investigated the mechanisms of aggressive behavior in Drosophila; however, little is known about the effects of chronic fighting experience. Here, we investigated if repeated fighting encounters would induce an internal state that could affect the expression of subsequent behavior. We trained wild-type males to become winners or losers by repeatedly pairing them with hypoaggressive or hyperaggressive opponents, respectively. As described previously, we observed that chronic losers tend to lose subsequent fights, while chronic winners tend to win them. Olfactory conditioning experiments showed that winning is perceived as rewarding, while losing is perceived as aversive. Moreover, the effect of chronic fighting experience generalized to other behaviors, such as gap-crossing and courtship. We propose that in response to repeatedly winning or losing aggressive encounters, male flies form an internal state that displays persistence and generalization; fight outcomes can also have positive or negative valence. Furthermore, we show that the activities of the PPL1-γ1pedc dopaminergic neuron and the MBON-γ1pedc\>α/β mushroom body output neuron are required for aversion to an olfactory cue associated with losing fights.

}, issn = {1091-6490}, doi = {10.1073/pnas.1716612115}, author = {Kim, Yong-Kyu and Saver, Mathias and Simon, Jasper and Kent, Clement F and Shao, Lisha and Eddison, Mark and Agrawal, Pavan and Texada, Michael and Truman, James W and Heberlein, Ulrike} } @article {49485, title = {Social isolation-induced epigenetic and transcriptional changes in Drosophila dopaminergic neurons.}, journal = {bioRxiv}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 Oct 14}, abstract = {Epigenetic mechanisms play fundamental roles in brain function and behavior and stressors such as social isolation can alter animal behavior via epigenetic mechanisms. However, due to cellular heterogeneity, identifying cell-type-specific epigenetic changes in the brain is challenging. Here we report first use of a modified INTACT method in behavioral epigenetics of Drosophila: a method we call mini-INTACT. Using ChIP-seq on mini-INTACT purified dopaminergic nuclei, we identified epigenetic signatures in socially-isolated and socially-enriched Drosophila males. Social experience altered the epigenetic landscape in clusters of genes involved in transcription and neural function. Some of these alterations were predicted by expression changes of four transcription factors and the prevalence of their binding sites in several clusters. These transcription factors were previously identified as activity-regulated genes and their knockdown in dopaminergic neurons reduced the effects of social experience on sleep. Our work enables the use of Drosophila as a model for cell-type-specific behavioral epigenetics. }, doi = {10.1101/443226}, author = {Agrawal, Pavan and Chung, Phuong and Heberlein, Ulrike and Kent, Clement F} } @article {48786, title = {Dissection of the Drosophila neuropeptide F circuit using a high-throughput two-choice assay.}, journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America}, volume = {114}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 Sep 05}, pages = {e8091-9}, abstract = {

In their classic experiments, Olds and Milner showed that rats learn to lever press to receive an electric stimulus in specific brain regions. This led to the identification of mammalian reward centers. Our interest in defining the neuronal substrates of reward perception in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster prompted us to develop a simpler experimental approach wherein flies could implement behavior that induces self-stimulation of specific neurons in their brains. The high-throughput assay employs optogenetic activation of neurons when the fly occupies a specific area of a behavioral chamber, and the flies{\textquoteright} preferential occupation of this area reflects their choosing to experience optogenetic stimulation. Flies in which neuropeptide F (NPF) neurons are activated display preference for the illuminated side of the chamber. We show that optogenetic activation of NPF neuron is rewarding in olfactory conditioning experiments and that the preference for NPF neuron activation is dependent on NPF signaling. Finally, we identify a small subset of NPF-expressing neurons located in the dorsomedial posterior brain that are sufficient to elicit preference in our assay. This assay provides the means for carrying out unbiased screens to map reward neurons in flies.

}, issn = {1091-6490}, doi = {10.1073/pnas.1710552114}, author = {Shao, Lisha and Saver, Mathias and Chung, Phuong and Ren, Qingzhong and Lee, Tzumin and Kent, Clement F and Heberlein, Ulrike} } @article {46756, title = {Genomic signatures of evolutionary transitions from solitary to group living.}, journal = {Science}, year = {2015}, month = {2015 May 14}, abstract = {

The evolution of eusociality is one of the major transitions in evolution, but the underlying genomic changes are unknown. We compared the genomes of ten bee species that vary in social complexity, representing multiple independent transitions in social evolution, and report three major findings. First, many important genes show evidence of neutral evolution as a consequence of relaxed selection with increasing social complexity. Second, there is no single road map to eusociality; independent evolutionary transitions in sociality have independent genetic underpinnings. Third, though clearly independent in detail, these transitions do have similar general features, including an increase in constrained protein evolution accompanied by increases in the potential for gene regulation and decreases in diversity and abundance of transposable elements. Eusociality may arise through different mechanisms each time, but would likely always involve an increase in the complexity of gene networks.

}, issn = {1095-9203}, doi = {10.1126/science.aaa4788}, author = {Kapheim, Karen M and Pan, Hailin and Li, Cai and Salzberg, Steven L and Puiu, Daniela and Magoc, Tanja and Robertson, Hugh M and Hudson, Matthew E and Venkat, Aarti and Fischman, Brielle J and Hernandez, Alvaro and Yandell, Mark and Ence, Daniel and Holt, Carson and Yocum, George D and Kemp, William P and Bosch, Jordi and Waterhouse, Robert M and Zdobnov, Evgeny M and Stolle, Eckart and Kraus, F Bernhard and Helbing, Sophie and Moritz, Robin F A and Glastad, Karl M and Hunt, Brendan G and Goodisman, Michael A D and Hauser, Frank and Grimmelikhuijzen, Cornelis J P and Pinheiro, Daniel Guariz and Nunes, Francis Morais Franco and Soares, Michelle Prioli Miranda and Tanaka, {\'E}rica Donato and Sim{\~o}es, Zil{\'a} Luz Paulino and Hartfelder, Klaus and Evans, Jay D and Barribeau, Seth M and Johnson, Reed M and Massey, Jonathan H and Southey, Bruce R and Hasselmann, Martin and Hamacher, Daniel and Biewer, Matthias and Kent, Clement F and Zayed, Amro and Blatti, Charles and Sinha, Saurabh and Johnston, J Spencer and Hanrahan, Shawn J and Kocher, Sarah D and Wang, Jun and Robinson, Gene E and Zhang, Guojie} } @inbook {46570, title = {Population genomic and phylogenomic insights into the evolution of physiology and behaviour in social insects}, booktitle = {Advances in Insect Physiology}, number = {48}, year = {2015}, pages = {293{\textendash}324}, abstract = {

Genomics revolutionized the field of social insect research by providing powerful tools to understand the relationship between genes, physiology and behaviour of social insects. Notably, analysis of gene expression and methylation patterns in the different castes of insect colonies highlighted many genes that likely underlie caste-specific physiological and behavioural phenotypes. However, earlier studies of social insect genomes lacked an {\textquoteleft}evolutionary{\textquoteright} context.\ Out of the millions of DNA bases found in the genome of a social insect, which pieces were most important to fitness over the timescale of social evolution?\ Here, we review a burgeoning body of literature that utilizes between-species or within-species genomic comparisons to highlight the evolutionary forces that have shaped social insect genomes. These pioneering phylogenetic and population genomic studies provide a critically needed evolutionary context to social insect genomes and underscore the importance of adaptive changes in physiology and behaviour in social evolution.

}, doi = {10.1016/bs.aiip.2015.01.002}, author = {Kent, Clement F and Zayed, Amro} } @article {6717, title = {Population genomics of the honey bee reveals strong signatures of positive selection on worker traits.}, journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America}, volume = {111}, year = {2014}, month = {2014 Jan 31}, pages = {2614-19}, abstract = {

Most theories used to explain the evolution of eusociality rest upon two key assumptions: mutations affecting the phenotype of sterile workers evolve by positive selection if the resulting traits benefit fertile kin, and that worker traits provide the primary mechanism allowing social insects to adapt to their environment. Despite the common view that positive selection drives phenotypic evolution of workers, we know very little about the prevalence of positive selection acting on the genomes of eusocial insects. We mapped the footprints of positive selection in Apis mellifera through analysis of 40 individual genomes, allowing us to identify thousands of genes and regulatory sequences with signatures of adaptive evolution over multiple timescales. We found Apoidea- and Apis-specific genes to be enriched for signatures of positive selection, indicating that novel genes play a disproportionately large role in adaptive evolution of eusocial insects. Worker-biased proteins have higher signatures of adaptive evolution relative to queen-biased proteins, supporting the view that worker traits are key to adaptation. We also found genes regulating worker division of labor to be enriched for signs of positive selection. Finally, genes associated with worker behavior based on analysis of brain gene expression were highly enriched for adaptive protein and cis-regulatory evolution. Our study highlights the significant contribution of worker phenotypes to adaptive evolution in social insects, and provides a wealth of knowledge on the loci that influence fitness in honey bees.

}, issn = {1091-6490}, doi = {10.1073/pnas.1315506111}, author = {Harpur, Brock A and Kent, Clement F and Molodtsova, Daria and Lebon, Jonathan M D and Alqarni, Abdulaziz S and Owayss, Ayman A and Zayed, Amro} }