@article {68471,
	title = {Leveraging the model-experiment loop: Examples from cellular slime mold chemotaxis.},
	journal = {Exp Cell Res},
	volume = {418},
	year = {2022},
	month = {09/2022},
	pages = {113218},
	abstract = {<p>Interplay between models and experimental data advances discovery and understanding in biology, particularly when models generate predictions that allow well-designed experiments to distinguish between alternative mechanisms. To illustrate how this feedback between models and experiments can lead to key insights into biological mechanisms, we explore three examples from cellular slime mold chemotaxis. These examples include studies that identified chemotaxis as the primary mechanism behind slime mold aggregation, discovered that cells likely measure chemoattractant gradients by sensing concentration differences across cell length, and tested the role of cell-associated chemoattractant degradation in shaping chemotactic fields. Although each study used a different model class appropriate to their hypotheses - qualitative, mathematical, or simulation-based - these examples all highlight the utility of modeling to formalize assumptions and generate testable predictions. A central element of this framework is the iterative use of models and experiments, specifically: matching experimental designs to the models, revising models based on mismatches with experimental data, and validating critical model assumptions and predictions with experiments. We advocate for continued use of this interplay between models and experiments to advance biological discovery.</p>
},
	keywords = {Chemotactic Factors, Chemotaxis, Computer Simulation, Dictyosteliida, Dictyostelium, Models, Biological},
	issn = {1090-2422},
	doi = {10.1016/j.yexcr.2022.113218},
	author = {Zhu, Xinwen and Hager, Emily R and Huyan, Chuqiao and Sgro, Allyson E}
}
