@article {70137,
	title = {A multi-muscular, redundant strategy for free-flight roll stability},
	journal = {bioRxiv},
	year = {2025},
	month = {2025 Oct 01},
	abstract = {<p>Whether recovering after a gust of wind, or rapidly saccading away from an oncoming predator, fruit flies show remarkable aerial dexterity about their body roll axis. Here, we investigated the detailed wing kinematic changes during free-flight roll motion and probed the neuromuscular basis for such changes. Consistent with previous work, we observed that flies manipulated the stroke amplitude difference between their wings to control their roll angle. Here, we show that flies are capable of achieving such changes by altering the stroke amplitude of either or both of their wings. Further we found that during corrections flies can also take advantage of an aerodynamically significant change in the angle of attack of their uppermost wing. Curiously, these corrective wing changes cannot be eliminated when motor neurons hypothesized to be used during roll maneuvers (i1, i2, b1, b2, and b3) are individually inhibited. However, free-flight optogenetic manipulations and quasi-steady aerodynamic calculations show that each of these motor neurons individually can effect kinematic changes consistent with a roll correction. Combining this evidence with an analysis of haltere inputs found in the BANC connectome, we propose that the observed robustness could be the result of two sets of muscular redundancies that receive shared inputs from haltere sensory afferents: one set, containing b1 and b2, is able to increase the stroke amplitude of the lower wing; while the other set, containing i1, i2, and b3, is able to decrease the stroke amplitude and wing pitch angle of the upper wing. Because of the redundancy in the input sensory information and output wing motion in the muscles in each cluster, the fly is able to perform roll stability maneuvers even when one of the constituent motor neurons is inhibited. This framework proposes new ways fast aerial maneuverability can be implemented when dealing with the fly{\textquoteright}s most unstable rotational degree of freedom.</p>
},
	doi = {10.1101/2025.09.29.679272},
	url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2025/10/01/2025.09.29.679272.1},
	author = {Ludlow, B. Kemper and Dhawan, Serene and Whitehead, Samuel C and Teoh, Han Kheng and Ehrhardt, Erica and Cowan, Noah and Dickerson, Bradley H and Cohen, Itai}
}
@article {68557,
	title = {Neuromuscular embodiment of feedback control elements in  flight.},
	journal = {Science Advances},
	volume = {8},
	year = {2022},
	month = {2022 Dec 14},
	pages = {eabo7461},
	abstract = {<p>While insects such as are flying, aerodynamic instabilities require that they make millisecond time scale adjustments to their wing motion to stay aloft and on course. These stabilization reflexes can be modeled as a proportional-integral (PI) controller; however, it is unclear how such control might be instantiated in insects at the level of muscles and neurons. Here, we show that the b1 and b2 motor units-prominent components of the fly{\textquoteright}s steering muscle system-modulate specific elements of the PI controller: the angular displacement (integral) and angular velocity (proportional), respectively. Moreover, these effects are observed only during the stabilization of pitch. Our results provide evidence for an organizational principle in which each muscle contributes to a specific functional role in flight control, a finding that highlights the power of using top-down behavioral modeling to guide bottom-up cellular manipulation studies.</p>
},
	issn = {2375-2548},
	doi = {10.1126/sciadv.abo7461},
	author = {Whitehead, Samuel C and Leone, Sofia and Lindsay, Theodore and Meiselman, Matthew R and Cowan, Noah J and Dickinson, Michael H and Yapici, Nilay and Stern, David L and Shirangi, Troy and Cohen, Itai}
}
