@article {69633, title = {A Drosophila computational brain model reveals sensorimotor processing.}, journal = {Nature}, volume = {634}, year = {2024}, month = {2024 Oct 02}, pages = {210-219}, abstract = {

The recent assembly of the adult Drosophila melanogaster central brain connectome, containing more than 125,000 neurons and 50 million synaptic connections, provides a template for examining sensory processing throughout the brain. Here we create a leaky integrate-and-fire computational model of the entire Drosophila brain, on the basis of neural connectivity and neurotransmitter identity, to study circuit properties of feeding and grooming behaviours. We show that activation of sugar-sensing or water-sensing gustatory neurons in the computational model accurately predicts neurons that respond to tastes and are required for feeding initiation. In addition, using the model to activate neurons in the feeding region of the Drosophila brain predicts those that elicit motor neuron firing-a testable hypothesis that we validate by optogenetic activation and behavioural studies. Activating different classes of gustatory neurons in the model makes accurate predictions of how several taste modalities interact, providing circuit-level insight into aversive and appetitive taste processing. Additionally, we applied this model to mechanosensory circuits and found that computational activation of mechanosensory neurons predicts activation of a small set of neurons comprising the antennal grooming circuit, and accurately describes the circuit response upon activation of different mechanosensory subtypes. Our results demonstrate that modelling brain circuits using only synapse-level connectivity and predicted neurotransmitter identity generates experimentally testable hypotheses and can describe complete sensorimotor transformations.

}, keywords = {Animals, Brain, Computer Simulation, Connectome, Drosophila melanogaster, Feeding Behavior, Female, Grooming, Male, Models, Neurological, Motor Neurons, Optogenetics, Synapses, Taste}, issn = {1476-4687}, doi = {10.1038/s41586-024-07763-9}, url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07763-9}, author = {Shiu, Philip K and Sterne, Gabriella R and Spiller, Nico and Franconville, Romain and Sandoval, Andrea and Zhou, Joie and Simha, Neha and Kang, Chan Hyuk and Yu, Seongbong and Kim, Jinseop S and Dorkenwald, Sven and Matsliah, Arie and Schlegel, Philipp and Yu, Szi-Chieh and McKellar, Claire E and Sterling, Amy and Costa, Marta and Eichler, Katharina and Bates, Alexander Shakeel and Eckstein, Nils and Funke, Jan and Jefferis, Gregory S X E and Murthy, Mala and Bidaye, Salil S and Hampel, Stefanie and Seeds, Andrew M and Scott, Kristin} } @article {68889, title = {Neuronal wiring diagram of an adult brain.}, journal = {Nature}, volume = {634}, year = {2024}, month = {2024 Oct 02}, pages = {124-138}, abstract = {

Connections between neurons can be mapped by acquiring and analysing electron microscopic brain images. In recent years, this approach has been applied to chunks of brains to reconstruct local connectivity maps that are highly informative, but nevertheless inadequate for understanding brain function more globally. Here we present a neuronal wiring diagram of a whole brain containing 5 {\texttimes} 107 chemical synapses between 139,255 neurons reconstructed from an adult female Drosophila melanogaster. The resource also incorporates annotations of cell classes and types, nerves, hemilineages and predictions of neurotransmitter identities. Data products are available for download, programmatic access and interactive browsing and have been made interoperable with other fly data resources. We derive a projectome-a map of projections between regions-from the connectome and report on tracing of synaptic pathways and the analysis of information flow from inputs (sensory and ascending neurons) to outputs (motor, endocrine and descending neurons) across both hemispheres and between the central brain and the optic lobes. Tracing from a subset of photoreceptors to descending motor pathways illustrates how structure can uncover putative circuit mechanisms underlying sensorimotor behaviours. The technologies and open ecosystem reported here set the stage for future large-scale connectome projects in other species.

}, doi = {10.1038/s41586-024-07558-y}, url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07558-y}, author = {Dorkenwald, Sven and Matsliah, Arie and Sterling, Amy R and Schlegel, Philipp and Yu, Szi-Chieh and McKellar, Claire E and Lin, Albert and Costa, Marta and Eichler, Katharina and Yin, Yijie and Silversmith, Will and Schneider-Mizell, Casey and Jordan, Chris S and Brittain, Derrick and Halageri, Akhilesh and Kuehner, Kai and Ogedengbe, Oluwaseun and Morey, Ryan and Gager, Jay and Kruk, Krzysztof and Perlman, Eric and Yang, Runzhe and Deutsch, David and Bland, Doug and Sorek, Marissa and Lu, Ran and Macrina, Thomas and Lee, Kisuk and Bae, J Alexander and Mu, Shang and Nehoran, Barak and Mitchell, Eric and Popovych, Sergiy and Wu, Jingpeng and Jia, Zhen and Castro, Manuel and Kemnitz, Nico and Ih, Dodam and Bates, Alexander Shakeel and Eckstein, Nils and Funke, Jan and Collman, Forrest and Bock, Davi D and Jefferis, Gregory S X E and Seung, H Sebastian and Murthy, Mala} } @article {65642, title = {Controlling motor neurons of every muscle for fly proboscis reaching.}, journal = {eLife}, volume = {9}, year = {2020}, month = {2020 Jun 25}, abstract = {

We describe the anatomy of all the primary motor neurons in the fly proboscis and characterize their contributions to its diverse reaching movements. Pairing this behavior with the wealth of genetic tools offers the possibility to study motor control at single-neuron resolution, and soon throughout entire circuits. As an entry to these circuits, we provide detailed anatomy of proboscis motor neurons, muscles, and joints. We create a collection of fly strains to individually manipulate every proboscis muscle through control of its motor neurons, the first such collection for an appendage. We generate a model of the action of each proboscis joint, and find that only a small number of motor neurons are needed to produce proboscis reaching. Comprehensive control of each motor element in this numerically simple system paves the way for future study of both reflexive and flexible movements of this appendage.

}, issn = {2050-084X}, doi = {10.7554/eLife.54978}, author = {McKellar, Claire E and Siwanowicz, Igor and Dickson, Barry J and Simpson, Julie H} } @article {56201, title = {Threshold-based ordering of sequential actions during Drosophila courtship.}, journal = {Current Biology : CB}, volume = {29}, year = {2019}, month = {2019 Jan 07}, pages = {426-34}, abstract = {

Goal-directed animal behaviors are typically composed of sequences of motor actions whose order and timing are critical for a successful outcome. Although numerous theoretical models for sequential action generation have been proposed, few have been supported by the identification of control neurons sufficient to elicit a sequence. Here, we identify a pair of descending neurons that coordinate a stereotyped sequence of engagement actions during Drosophila melanogaster male courtship behavior. These actions are initiated sequentially but persist cumulatively, a feature not explained by existing models of sequential behaviors. We find evidence consistent with a ramp-to-threshold mechanism, in which increasing neuronal activity elicits each action independently at successively higher activity thresholds.

}, issn = {1879-0445}, doi = {10.1016/j.cub.2018.12.019}, author = {McKellar, Claire E and Lillvis, Joshua L and Bath, Daniel E and Fitzgerald, James E and Cannon, John G and Simpson, Julie H and Dickson, Barry J} } @article {48542, title = {A protocol demonstrating 60 different Drosophila behaviors in one assay.}, journal = {Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education (JUNE)}, volume = {15}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 Spring}, pages = {A110-6}, abstract = {

The fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster performs many behaviors, from simple motor actions to complex social interactions, that are of interest to neurobiologists studying how the brain controls behavior. Here, an undergraduate laboratory exercise uses cutting-edge methods to activate sets of neurons thermogenetically, triggering 60 different behaviors. Students learn how to recognize this large repertoire of behaviors from 16 fly strains that are publicly available, and from a large set of training videos provided here. A full protocol, timeline and handouts are included. Instructors need not have any experience working with flies. Student feedback is reported; in our experience, students are fascinated and highly engaged by watching animals perform such a broad array of behaviors. This exercise teaches fly husbandry and crossing, careful scientific observation, and principles of behavioral screening.

}, url = {http://www.funjournal.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/june-15-110.pdf}, author = {McKellar, Claire E and Wyttenbach, Robert A} } @article {48788, title = {Simultaneous activation of parallel sensory pathways promotes a grooming sequence in Drosophila.}, journal = {eLife}, volume = {6}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 Sep 09}, abstract = {

A central model that describes how behavioral sequences are produced features a neural architecture that readies different movements simultaneously, and a mechanism where prioritized suppression between the movements determines their sequential performance. We previously described a model whereby suppression drives a Drosophila grooming sequence that is induced by simultaneous activation of different sensory pathways that each elicit a distinct movement (Seeds et al. 2014). Here, we confirm this model using transgenic expression to identify and optogenetically activate sensory neurons that elicit specific grooming movements. Simultaneous activation of different sensory pathways elicits a grooming sequence that resembles the naturally induced sequence. Moreover, the sequence proceeds after the sensory excitation is terminated, indicating that a persistent trace of this excitation induces the next grooming movement once the previous one is performed. This reveals a mechanism whereby parallel sensory inputs can be integrated and stored to elicit a delayed and sequential grooming response.

}, issn = {2050-084X}, doi = {10.7554/eLife.28804}, author = {Hampel, Stefanie and McKellar, Claire E and Simpson, Julie H and Seeds, Andrew M} } @article {47561, title = {Motor control of fly feeding.}, journal = {Journal of Neurogenetics}, volume = {30}, year = {2016}, month = {2016 Jun 16}, pages = {101-11}, abstract = {

Following considerable progress on the molecular and cellular basis of taste perception in fly sensory neurons, the time is now ripe to explore how taste information, integrated with hunger and satiety, undergo a sensorimotor transformation to lead to the motor actions of feeding behavior. I examine what is known of feeding circuitry in adult flies from more than 250 years of work in larger flies and from newer work in Drosophila. I review the anatomy of the proboscis, its muscles and their functions (where known), its motor neurons, interneurons known to receive taste inputs, interneurons that diverge from taste circuitry to provide information to other circuits, interneurons from other circuits that converge on feeding circuits, proprioceptors that influence the motor control of feeding, and sites of integration of hunger and satiety on feeding circuits. In spite of the several neuron types now known, a connected pathway from taste inputs to feeding motor outputs has yet to be found. We are on the threshold of an era where these individual components will be assembled into circuits, revealing how nervous system architecture leads to the control of behavior.

}, issn = {1563-5260}, doi = {10.1080/01677063.2016.1177047}, author = {McKellar, Claire E} } @article {1513, title = {Drosophila brainbow: a recombinase-based fluorescence labeling technique to subdivide neural expression patterns.}, journal = {Nature Methods}, volume = {8}, year = {2011}, month = {2011 Mar}, pages = {253-9}, abstract = {

We developed a multicolor neuron labeling technique in Drosophila melanogaster that combines the power to specifically target different neural populations with the label diversity provided by stochastic color choice. This adaptation of vertebrate Brainbow uses recombination to select one of three epitope-tagged proteins detectable by immunofluorescence. Two copies of this construct yield six bright, separable colors. We used Drosophila Brainbow to study the innervation patterns of multiple antennal lobe projection neuron lineages in the same preparation and to observe the relative trajectories of individual aminergic neurons. Nerve bundles, and even individual neurites hundreds of micrometers long, can be followed with definitive color labeling. We traced motor neurons in the subesophageal ganglion and correlated them to neuromuscular junctions to identify their specific proboscis muscle targets. The ability to independently visualize multiple lineage or neuron projections in the same preparation greatly advances the goal of mapping how neurons connect into circuits.

}, issn = {1548-7105}, doi = {10.1038/nmeth.1566}, author = {Hampel, Stefanie and Chung, Phuong and McKellar, Claire E and Hall, Donald and Looger, Loren L and Simpson, Julie H} }