@article {70138, title = {The Connectome Interpreter Toolkit}, journal = {bioRxiv}, year = {2025}, month = {2025 Sep 30}, abstract = {

Complete synaptic wiring diagrams, or connectomes, of whole brains open new opportunities for studying the structure-function relationship of neural circuits. However, the large number of nodes and edges in the graphs makes the analysis challenging. Here, we present the Connectome Interpreter (https://github.com/YijieYin/connectome_interpreter), an open-source software toolkit for efficient graph traversal to find polysynaptic pathways, compute the effective connectivity and receptive fields for arbitrarily deep neurons, slice out subcircuits, and non-linear but differentiable circuit modeling, implemented using efficient approaches tailored to the high density and size of connectomes such as that of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. Our approach delivers results orders of magnitude faster than conventional methods in consumer computer hardware. We demonstrate the capabilities of our toolkit with select applications, including quantifying the density of polysynaptic connections in the whole adult fruit fly brain, exploring the necessity for non-linearities in circuit modeling, and combining known function of neurons with the connectome to aid in formulating hypotheses of circuit function.

}, doi = {10.1101/2025.09.29.679410}, url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2025/09/30/2025.09.29.679410}, author = {Yin, Yijie and Hoeller, Judith and Mathiasen, Alexander and Tsang, Joanna and Charrier, Monique Estelle and Cardona, Albert} } @article {70155, title = {Sexual dimorphism in the complete connectome of the Drosophila male central nervous system}, journal = {bioRxiv}, year = {2025}, month = {2025 Oct 09}, abstract = {

Sex differences in behaviour exist across the animal kingdom, typically under strong genetic regulation. In Drosophila, previous work has shown that fruitless and doublesex transcription factors identify neurons driving sexually dimorphic behaviour. However, the organisation of dimorphic neurons into functional circuits remains unclear.We now present the connectome of the entire Drosophila male central nervous system. This contains 166,691 neurons spanning the brain and ventral nerve cord, fully proofread and comprehensively annotated including fruitless and doublesex expression and 11,691 cell types. By comparison with a previous female brain connectome, we provide the first comprehensive description of the differences between male and female brains to synaptic resolution. Of 7,319 cross-matched cell types in the central brain, 114 are dimorphic with an additional 262 male- and 69 female-specific (totalling 4.8\% of neurons in males and 2.4\% in females).This resource enables analysis of full sensory-to-motor circuits underlying complex behaviours as well as the impact of dimorphic elements. Sex-specific and dimorphic neurons are concentrated in higher brain centres while the sensory and motor periphery are largely isomorphic. Within higher centres, male-specific connections are organised into hotspots defined by male-specific neurons or the presence of male-specific arbours on neurons that are otherwise similar between sexes. Numerous circuit switches reroute sensory information to form conserved, antagonistic circuits controlling opposing behaviours.

}, doi = {10.1101/2025.10.09.680999}, url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2025/10/09/2025.10.09.680999}, author = {Berg, Stuart and Beckett, Isabella R and Costa, Marta and Schlegel, Philipp and Januszewski, Micha{\l} and Marin, Elizabeth C and Nern, Aljoscha and Preibisch, Stephan and Qiu, Wei and Takemura, Shin-ya and Fragniere, Alexandra MC and Champion, Andrew S and Adjavon, Diane-Yayra and Cook, Michael and Gkantia, Marina and Hayworth, Kenneth J and Huang, Gary B and Katz, William T and K{\"a}mpf, Florian and Lu, Zhiyuan and Ordish, Christopher and Paterson, Tyler and St{\"u}rner, Tomke and Trautman, Eric T and Whittle, Catherine R and Burnett, Laura E and Hoeller, Judith and Li, Feng and Loesche, Frank and Morris, Billy J and Pietzsch, Tobias and Pleijzier, Markus W and Silva, Valeria and Yin, Yijie and Ali, Iris and Badalamente, Griffin and Bates, Alexander Shakeel and Bogovic, John and Brooks, Paul and Cachero, Sebastian and Canino, Brandon S and Chaisrisawatsuk, Bhumpanya and Clements, Jody and Crowe, Arthur and de Haan Vicente, In{\^e}s and Dempsey, Georgia and Don{\`a}, Erika and dos Santos, M{\'a}rcia and Dreher, Marisa and Dunne, Christopher R and Eichler, Katharina and Finley-May, Samantha and Flynn, Miriam A and Hameed, Imran and Hopkins, Gary Patrick and Hubbard, Philip M and Kiassat, Ladann and Kovalyak, Julie and Lauchie, Shirley A and Leonard, Meghan and Lohff, Alanna and Longden, Kit D and Maldonado, Charli A and Mitletton, Myrto and Moitra, Ilina and Moon, Sung Soo and Mooney, Caroline and Munnelly, Eva J and Okeoma, Nneoma and Olbris, Donald J and Pai, Anika and Patel, Birava and Phillips, Emily M and Plaza, Stephen M and Richards, Alana and Rivas Salinas, Jennifer and Roberts, Ruair{\'\i} Jv and Rogers, Edward M and Scott, Ashley L and Scuderi, Louis A and Seenivasan, Pavithraa and Serratosa Capdevila, Laia and Smith, Claire and Svirskas, Rob and Takemura, Satoko and Tastekin, Ibrahim and Thomson, Alexander and Umayam, Lowell and Walsh, John J and Whittome, Holly and Xu, C Shan and Yakal, Emily A and Yang, Tansy and Zhao, Arthur and George, Reed and Jain, Viren and Jayaraman, Vivek and Korff, Wyatt and Meissner, Geoffrey W and Romani, Sandro and Funke, Jan and Knecht, Christopher and Saalfeld, Stephan and Scheffer, Louis K and Waddell, Scott and Card, Gwyneth M and Ribeiro, Carlos and Reiser, Michael B and Hess, Harald F and Rubin, Gerald M and Jefferis, Gregory Sxe} } @article {69557, title = {Bridging tuning and invariance with equivariant neuronal representations}, journal = {bioRxiv}, year = {2024}, month = {2024 Aug 02}, abstract = {

As we move through the world, we see the same visual scenes from different perspectives. Although we experience perspective deformations, our perception of a scene remains stable. This raises the question of which neuronal representations in visual brain areas are perspective-tuned and which are invariant. Focusing on planar rotations, we introduce a mathematical framework based on the principle of equivariance, which asserts that an image rotation results in a corresponding rotation of neuronal representations, to explain how the same representation can range from being fully tuned to fully invariant. We applied this framework to large-scale simultaneous neuronal recordings from four visual cortical areas in mice, where we found that representations are both tuned and invariant but become more invariant across higher-order areas. While common deep convolutional neural networks show similar trends in orientation-invariance across layers, they are not rotation-equivariant. We propose that equivariance is a prevalent computation of populations of biological neurons to gradually achieve invariance through structured tuning.

}, doi = {10.1101/2024.08.02.606398}, url = {https://www.doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.02.606398}, author = {Hoeller, Judith and Zhong, Lin and Pachitariu, Marius and Romani, Sandro} }