@article {70139, title = {In-situ glial cell-surface proteomics identifies pro-longevity factors in Drosophila}, journal = {eLife}, year = {2025}, month = {2025 Dec 12}, abstract = {

Much focus has shifted towards understanding how glial dysfunction contributes to age-related neurodegeneration due to the critical roles glial cells play in maintaining healthy brain function. Cell-cell interactions, which are largely mediated by cell-surface proteins, control many critical aspects of development and physiology; as such, dysregulation of glial cell-surface proteins in particular is hypothesized to play an important role in age-related neurodegeneration. However, it remains technically difficult to profile glial cell-surface proteins in intact brains. Here, we applied a cell-surface proteomic profiling method to glial cells from intact brains in\ Drosophila,\ which enabled us to fully profile cell-surface proteomes\ in-situ, preserving native cell-cell interactions that would otherwise be omitted using traditional proteomics methods. Applying this platform to young and old flies, we investigated how glial cell-surface proteomes change during aging. We identified candidate genes predicted to be involved in brain aging, including several associated with neural development and synapse wiring molecules not previously thought to be particularly active in glia. Through a functional genetic screen, we identified one surface protein, DIP-β, which is down-regulated in old flies and can increase fly lifespan when overexpressed in adult glial cells. We further performed whole-head single-nucleus RNA-seq, and revealed that DIP-β overexpression mainly impacts glial and fat cells. We also found that glial DIP-β overexpression was associated with improved cell-cell communication, which may contribute to the observed lifespan extension. Our study is the first to apply\ in-situ\ cell-surface proteomics to glial cells in\ Drosophila, and to identify DIP-β as a potential glial regulator of brain aging.

}, doi = {10.7554/eLife.109422.1}, url = {https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.109422.1}, author = {Marques, Madeline P. and Sun, Bo and Park, Ye-Jin and Jackson, Tyler and Lu, Tzu-Chiao and Qi, Yanyan and Harrison, Erin and Wang, Miranda C. and Venkatachalam, Kartik and Pasha, Omar Moussa and Varanasi, Amogh and Carey, Dominique Kiki and Mani, D.R. and Zirin, Jonathan and Qadiri, Mujeeb and Hu, Yanhui and Perrimon, Norbert and Carr, Steven A. and Udeshi, Namrata D. and Luo, Liqun and Li, Jiefu and Li, Hongjie} } @article {69994, title = {A multimodal adaptive optical microscope for in vivo imaging from molecules to organisms}, journal = {bioRxiv}, year = {2025}, month = {2025 Jun 16}, abstract = {

Understanding biological systems requires observing features and processes across vast spatial and temporal scales, spanning nanometers to centimeters and milliseconds to days, often using multiple imaging modalities within complex native microenvironments. Yet, achieving this comprehensive view is challenging because microscopes optimized for specific tasks typically lack versatility due to inherent optical and sample handling trade-offs, and frequently suffer performance degradation from sample-induced optical aberrations in multicellular contexts. Here, we present MOSAIC, a reconfigurable microscope that integrates multiple advanced imaging techniques including light-sheet, label-free, super-resolution, and multi-photon, all equipped with adaptive optics. MOSAIC enables non-invasive imaging of subcellular dynamics in both cultured cells and live multicellular organisms, nanoscale mapping of molecular architectures across millimeter-scale expanded tissues, and structural/functional neural imaging within live mice. MOSAIC facilitates correlative studies across biological scales within the same specimen, providing an integrated platform for broad biological investigation.

Preprint:\ https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2025/06/13/2025.06.02.657494

}, doi = {10.1101/2025.06.02.657494}, url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2025/06/13/2025.06.02.657494}, author = {Fu, Tian-Ming and Liu, Gaoxiang and Milkie, Daniel E. and Ruan, Xiongtao and G{\"o}rlitz, Frederik and Shi, Yu and Ferro, Valentina and Divekar, Nikita S. and Wang, Wei and York, Harrison M. and Kilic, Velat and Mueller, Matthew and Liang, Yajie and Daugird, Timothy A. and Gacha-Garay, Maria J. and Larkin, Kathryn A. and Adikes, Rebecca C. and Harrison, Nathaniel and Shirazinejad, Cyna and Williams, Samara and Nourse, Jamison L. and Sheu, Shu-Hsien and Gao, Liang and Li, Tongchao and Mondal, Chandrani and Achour, Kemal and Hercule, Wilmene and Stabley, Daniel and Emmerich, Kevin and Dong, Peng and Drubin, David and Liu, Zhe J. and Clapham, David and Mumm, Jeff S. and Koyama, Minoru and Killilea, Alison and Bravo-Cordero, Jose Javier and Keene, C. Dirk and Luo, Liqun and Kirchhausen, Tom and Pathak, Medha M. and Arumugam, Senthil and Nunez, James K. and Gao, Ruixuan and Matus, David Q. and Martin, Benjamin L. and Swinburne, Ian A. and Betzig, Eric and Legant, Wesley R. and Upadhyayula, Srigokul} } @article {69534, title = {Molecular and cellular mechanisms of teneurin signaling in synaptic partner matching.}, journal = {Cell}, year = {2024}, month = {2024 Jul 03}, abstract = {

In developing brains, axons exhibit remarkable precision in selecting synaptic partners among many non-partner cells. Evolutionarily conserved teneurins are transmembrane proteins that instruct synaptic partner matching. However, how intracellular signaling pathways execute teneurins{\textquoteright} functions is unclear. Here, we use in situ proximity labeling to obtain the intracellular interactome of a teneurin (Ten-m) in the Drosophila brain. Genetic interaction studies using quantitative partner matching assays in both olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs) and projection neurons (PNs) reveal a common pathway: Ten-m binds to and negatively regulates a RhoGAP, thus activating the Rac1 small GTPases to promote synaptic partner matching. Developmental analyses with single-axon resolution identify the cellular mechanism of synaptic partner matching: Ten-m signaling promotes local F-actin levels and stabilizes ORN axon branches that contact partner PN dendrites. Combining spatial proteomics and high-resolution phenotypic analyses, this study advanced our understanding of both cellular and molecular mechanisms of synaptic partner matching.

}, issn = {1097-4172}, doi = {10.1016/j.cell.2024.06.022}, author = {Xu, Chuanyun and Li, Zhuoran and Lyu, Cheng and Hu, Yixin and McLaughlin, Colleen N and Wong, Kenneth Kin Lam and Xie, Qijing and Luginbuhl, David J and Li, Hongjie and Udeshi, Namrata D and Svinkina, Tanya and Mani, D R and Han, Shuo and Li, Tongchao and Li, Yang and Guajardo, Ricardo and Ting, Alice Y and Carr, Steven A and Li, Jiefu and Luo, Liqun} } @article {68675, title = {Origin of wiring specificity in an olfactory map revealed by neuron type-specific, time-lapse imaging of dendrite targeting.}, journal = {eLife}, volume = {12}, year = {2023}, month = {2023 Mar 28}, abstract = {

How does wiring specificity of neural maps emerge during development? Formation of the adult olfactory glomerular map begins with patterning of projection neuron (PN) dendrites at the early pupal stage. To better understand the origin of wiring specificity of this map, we created genetic tools to systematically characterize dendrite patterning across development at PN type-specific resolution. We find that PNs use lineage and birth order combinatorially to build the initial dendritic map. Specifically, birth order directs dendrite targeting in rotating and binary manners for PNs of the anterodorsal and lateral lineages, respectively. Two-photon- and adaptive optical lattice light-sheet microscope-based time-lapse imaging reveals that PN dendrites initiate active targeting with direction-dependent branch stabilization on the timescale of seconds. Moreover, PNs that are used in both the larval and adult olfactory circuits prune their larval-specific dendrites and re-extend new dendrites simultaneously to facilitate timely olfactory map organization. Our work highlights the power and necessity of type-specific neuronal access and time-lapse imaging in identifying wiring mechanisms that underlie complex patterns of functional neural maps.

}, issn = {2050-084X}, doi = {10.7554/eLife.85521}, author = {Wong, Kenneth Kin Lam and Li, Tongchao and Fu, Tian-Ming and Liu, Gaoxiang and Lyu, Cheng and Kohani, Sayeh and Xie, Qijing and Luginbuhl, David J and Upadhyayula, Srigokul and Betzig, Eric and Luo, Liqun} } @article {68422, title = {Fly Cell Atlas: A single-nucleus transcriptomic atlas of the adult fruit fly.}, journal = {Science}, volume = {375}, year = {2022}, month = {03/2022}, pages = {eabk2432}, abstract = {

For more than 100 years, the fruit fly has been one of the most studied model organisms. Here, we present a single-cell atlas of the adult fly, Tabula , that includes 580,000 nuclei from 15 individually dissected sexed tissues as well as the entire head and body, annotated to \>250 distinct cell types. We provide an in-depth analysis of cell type-related gene signatures and transcription factor markers, as well as sexual dimorphism, across the whole animal. Analysis of common cell types between tissues, such as blood and muscle cells, reveals rare cell types and tissue-specific subtypes. This atlas provides a valuable resource for the community and serves as a reference to study genetic perturbations and disease models at single-cell resolution.

}, keywords = {Animals, Cell Nucleus, Databases, Genetic, Drosophila melanogaster, Drosophila Proteins, Female, Gene Expression Regulation, Gene Regulatory Networks, Genes, Insect, Male, RNA-Seq, Sex Characteristics, Single-Cell Analysis, Transcription Factors, Transcriptome}, issn = {1095-9203}, doi = {10.1126/science.abk2432}, author = {Li, Hongjie and Janssens, Jasper and De Waegeneer, Maxime and Kolluru, Sai Saroja and Davie, Kristofer and Gardeux, Vincent and Saelens, Wouter and David, Fabrice P A and Brbi{\'c}, Maria and Spanier, Katina and Leskovec, Jure and McLaughlin, Colleen N and Xie, Qijing and Jones, Robert C and Brueckner, Katja and Shim, Jiwon and Tattikota, Sudhir Gopal and Schnorrer, Frank and Rust, Katja and Nystul, Todd G and Carvalho-Santos, Zita and Ribeiro, Carlos and Pal, Soumitra and Mahadevaraju, Sharvani and Przytycka, Teresa M and Allen, Aaron M and Goodwin, Stephen F and Berry, Cameron W and Fuller, Margaret T and White-Cooper, Helen and Matunis, Erika L and DiNardo, Stephen and Galenza, Anthony and O{\textquoteright}Brien, Lucy Erin and Dow, Julian A T and Jasper, Heinrich and Oliver, Brian and Perrimon, Norbert and Deplancke, Bart and Quake, Stephen R and Luo, Liqun and Aerts, Stein and Agarwal, Devika and Ahmed-Braimah, Yasir and Arbeitman, Michelle and Ariss, Majd M and Augsburger, Jordan and Ayush, Kumar and Baker, Catherine C and Banisch, Torsten and Birker, Katja and Bodmer, Rolf and Bolival, Benjamin and Brantley, Susanna E and Brill, Julie A and Brown, Nora C and Buehner, Norene A and Cai, Xiaoyu Tracy and Cardoso-Figueiredo, Rita and Casares, Fernando and Chang, Amy and Clandinin, Thomas R and Crasta, Sheela and Desplan, Claude and Detweiler, Angela M and Dhakan, Darshan B and Don{\`a}, Erika and Engert, Stefanie and Floc{\textquoteright}hlay, Swann and George, Nancy and Gonz{\'a}lez-Segarra, Amanda J and Groves, Andrew K and Gumbin, Samantha and Guo, Yanmeng and Harris, Devon E and Heifetz, Yael and Holtz, Stephen L and Horns, Felix and Hudry, Bruno and Hung, Ruei-Jiun and Jan, Yuh Nung and Jaszczak, Jacob S and Jefferis, Gregory S X E and Karkanias, Jim and Karr, Timothy L and Katheder, Nadja Sandra and Kezos, James and Kim, Anna A and Kim, Seung K and Kockel, Lutz and Konstantinides, Nikolaos and Kornberg, Thomas B and Krause, Henry M and Labott, Andrew Thomas and Laturney, Meghan and Lehmann, Ruth and Leinwand, Sarah and Li, Jiefu and Li, Joshua Shing Shun and Li, Kai and Li, Ke and Li, Liying and Li, Tun and Litovchenko, Maria and Liu, Han-Hsuan and Liu, Yifang and Lu, Tzu-Chiao and Manning, Jonathan and Mase, Anjeli and Matera-Vatnick, Mikaela and Matias, Neuza Reis and McDonough-Goldstein, Caitlin E and McGeever, Aaron and McLachlan, Alex D and Moreno-Roman, Paola and Neff, Norma and Neville, Megan and Ngo, Sang and Nielsen, Tanja and O{\textquoteright}Brien, Caitlin E and Osumi-Sutherland, David and Ozel, Mehmet Neset and Papatheodorou, Irene and Petkovic, Maja and Pilgrim, Clare and Pisco, Angela Oliveira and Reisenman, Carolina and Sanders, Erin Nicole and Dos Santos, Gilberto and Scott, Kristin and Sherlekar, Aparna and Shiu, Philip and Sims, David and Sit, Rene V and Slaidina, Maija and Smith, Harold E and Sterne, Gabriella and Su, Yu-Han and Sutton, Daniel and Tamayo, Marco and Tan, Michelle and Tastekin, Ibrahim and Treiber, Christoph and Vacek, David and Vogler, Georg and Waddell, Scott and Wang, Wanpeng and Wilson, Rachel I and Wolfner, Mariana F and Wong, Yiu-Cheung E and Xie, Anthony and Xu, Jun and Yamamoto, Shinya and Yan, Jia and Yao, Zepeng and Yoda, Kazuki and Zhu, Ruijun and Zinzen, Robert P} } @article {68418, title = {In situ cell-type-specific cell-surface proteomic profiling in mice.}, journal = {Neuron}, year = {2022}, month = {10/2022}, abstract = {

Cell-surface proteins (CSPs) mediate intercellular communication throughout the lives of multicellular organisms. However, there are no generalizable methods for quantitative CSP profiling in specific cell types in vertebrate tissues. Here, we present in situ cell-surface proteome extraction by extracellular labeling (iPEEL), a proximity labeling method in mice that enables spatiotemporally precise labeling of cell-surface proteomes in a cell-type-specific environment in native tissues for discovery proteomics. Applying iPEEL to developing and mature cerebellar Purkinje cells revealed differential enrichment in CSPs with post-translational protein processing and synaptic functions in the developing and mature cell-surface proteomes, respectively. A proteome-instructed in\ vivo loss-of-function screen identified a critical, multifaceted role for Armh4 in Purkinje cell dendrite morphogenesis. Armh4 overexpression also disrupts dendrite morphogenesis; this effect requires its conserved cytoplasmic domain and is augmented by disrupting its endocytosis. Our results highlight the utility of CSP profiling in native mammalian tissues for identifying regulators of cell-surface signaling.

}, issn = {1097-4199}, doi = {10.1016/j.neuron.2022.09.025}, author = {Shuster, S Andrew and Li, Jiefu and Chon, URee and Sinantha-Hu, Miley C and Luginbuhl, David J and Udeshi, Namrata D and Carey, Dominique Kiki and Takeo, Yukari H and Xie, Qijing and Xu, Chuanyun and Mani, D R and Han, Shuo and Ting, Alice Y and Carr, Steven A and Luo, Liqun} } @article {68419, title = {Transcription factor Acj6 controls dendrite targeting via a combinatorial cell-surface code.}, journal = {Neuron}, volume = {110}, year = {2022}, month = {07/2022}, pages = {2299-2314.e8}, abstract = {

Transcription factors specify the fate and connectivity of developing neurons. We investigate how a lineage-specific transcription factor, Acj6, controls the precise dendrite targeting of Drosophila olfactory projection neurons (PNs) by regulating the expression of cell-surface proteins. Quantitative cell-surface proteomic profiling of wild-type and acj6 mutant PNs in intact developing brains, and a proteome-informed genetic screen identified PN surface proteins that execute Acj6-regulated wiring decisions. These include canonical cell adhesion molecules and proteins previously not associated with wiring, such as Piezo, whose mechanosensitive ion channel activity is dispensable for its function in PN dendrite targeting. Comprehensive genetic analyses revealed that Acj6 employs unique sets of cell-surface proteins in different PN types for dendrite targeting. Combined expression of Acj6 wiring executors rescued acj6 mutant phenotypes with higher efficacy and breadth than expression of individual executors. Thus, Acj6 controls wiring specificity of different neuron types by specifying distinct combinatorial expression of cell-surface executors.

}, keywords = {Animals, Dendrites, Drosophila, Drosophila Proteins, Ion Channels, Membrane Proteins, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Olfactory Pathways, Olfactory Receptor Neurons, POU Domain Factors, Proteomics, Transcription Factors}, issn = {1097-4199}, doi = {10.1016/j.neuron.2022.04.026}, author = {Xie, Qijing and Li, Jiefu and Li, Hongjie and Udeshi, Namrata D and Svinkina, Tanya and Orlin, Daniel and Kohani, Sayeh and Guajardo, Ricardo and Mani, D R and Xu, Chuanyun and Li, Tongchao and Han, Shuo and Wei, Wei and Shuster, S Andrew and Luginbuhl, David J and Quake, Stephen R and Murthy, Swetha E and Ting, Alice Y and Carr, Steven A and Luo, Liqun} } @article {67737, title = {Cellular bases of olfactory circuit assembly revealed by systematic time-lapse imaging.}, journal = {Cell}, volume = {184}, year = {2021}, month = {2021 Sep 30}, pages = {5107}, abstract = {

Neural circuit assembly features simultaneous targeting of numerous neuronal processes from constituent neuron types, yet the dynamics is poorly understood. Here, we use the Drosophila olfactory circuit to investigate dynamic cellular processes by which olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs) target axons precisely to specific glomeruli in the ipsi- and contralateral antennal lobes. Time-lapse imaging of individual axons from 30 ORN types revealed a rich diversity in extension speed, innervation timing, and ipsilateral branch locations and identified that ipsilateral targeting occurs via stabilization of transient interstitial branches. Fast imaging using adaptive optics-corrected lattice light-sheet microscopy showed that upon approaching target, many ORN types exhibiting "exploring branches" consisted of parallel microtubule-based terminal branches emanating from an F-actin-rich hub. Antennal nerve ablations uncovered essential roles for bilateral axons in contralateral target selection and for ORN axons to facilitate dendritic refinement of postsynaptic partner neurons. Altogether, these observations provide cellular bases for wiring specificity establishment.

}, issn = {1097-4172}, doi = {10.1016/j.cell.2021.08.030}, author = {Li, Tongchao and Fu, Tian-Ming and Wong, Kenneth Kin Lam and Li, Hongjie and Xie, Qijing and Luginbuhl, David J and Wagner, Mark J and Betzig, Eric and Luo, Liqun} } @article {68425, title = {Single-cell transcriptomes of developing and adult olfactory receptor neurons in Drosophila}, journal = {Elife}, volume = {10}, year = {2021}, month = {02/2021}, abstract = {

Recognition of environmental cues is essential for the survival of all organisms. Transcriptional changes occur to enable the generation and function of the neural circuits underlying sensory perception. To gain insight into these changes, we generated single-cell transcriptomes of olfactory- (ORNs), thermo-, and hygro-sensory neurons at an early developmental and adult stage using single-cell and single-nucleus RNA sequencing. We discovered that ORNs maintain expression of the same olfactory receptors across development. Using receptor expression and computational approaches, we matched transcriptomic clusters corresponding to anatomically and physiologically defined neuron types across multiple developmental stages. We found that cell-type-specific transcriptomes partly reflected axon trajectory choices in development and sensory modality in adults. We uncovered stage-specific genes that could regulate the wiring and sensory responses of distinct ORN types. Collectively, our data reveal transcriptomic features of sensory neuron biology and provide a resource for future studies of their development and physiology.

}, keywords = {Animals, Drosophila melanogaster, Drosophila Proteins, Female, Male, Olfactory Receptor Neurons, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Single-Cell Analysis, Smell, Transcriptome}, issn = {2050-084X}, doi = {10.7554/eLife.63856}, author = {McLaughlin, Colleen N and Brbi{\'c}, Maria and Xie, Qijing and Li, Tongchao and Horns, Felix and Kolluru, Sai Saroja and Kebschull, Justus M and Vacek, David and Xie, Anthony and Li, Jiefu and Jones, Robert C and Leskovec, Jure and Quake, Stephen R and Luo, Liqun and Li, Hongjie} } @article {68426, title = {Temporal evolution of single-cell transcriptomes of olfactory projection neurons.}, journal = {Elife}, volume = {10}, year = {2021}, month = {01/2021}, abstract = {

Neurons undergo substantial morphological and functional changes during development to form precise synaptic connections and acquire specific physiological properties. What are the underlying transcriptomic bases? Here, we obtained the single-cell transcriptomes of olfactory projection neurons (PNs) at four developmental stages. We decoded the identity of 21 transcriptomic clusters corresponding to 20 PN types and developed methods to match transcriptomic clusters representing the same PN type across development. We discovered that PN transcriptomes reflect unique biological processes unfolding at each stage-neurite growth and pruning during metamorphosis at an early pupal stage; peaked transcriptomic diversity during olfactory circuit assembly at mid-pupal stages; and neuronal signaling in adults. At early developmental stages, PN types with adjacent birth order share similar transcriptomes. Together, our work reveals principles of cellular diversity during brain development and provides a resource for future studies of neural development in PNs and other neuronal types.

}, keywords = {Animals, Drosophila melanogaster, Neurites, Olfactory Nerve, Single-Cell Analysis, Time Factors, Transcriptome}, issn = {2050-084X}, doi = {10.7554/eLife.63450}, author = {Xie, Qijing and Brbi{\'c}, Maria and Horns, Felix and Kolluru, Sai Saroja and Jones, Robert C and Li, Jiefu and Reddy, Anay R and Xie, Anthony and Kohani, Sayeh and Li, Zhuoran and McLaughlin, Colleen N and Li, Tongchao and Xu, Chuanyun and Vacek, David and Luginbuhl, David J and Leskovec, Jure and Quake, Stephen R and Luo, Liqun and Li, Hongjie} } @article {68429, title = {Cell-Surface Proteomic Profiling in the Fly Brain Uncovers Wiring Regulators.}, journal = {Cell}, volume = {180}, year = {2020}, month = {01/2020}, pages = {373-386.e15}, abstract = {

Molecular interactions at the cellular interface mediate organized assembly of single cells into tissues and, thus, govern the development and physiology of multicellular organisms. Here, we developed a cell-type-specific, spatiotemporally resolved approach to profile cell-surface proteomes in intact tissues. Quantitative profiling of cell-surface proteomes of Drosophila olfactory projection neurons (PNs) in pupae and adults revealed global downregulation of wiring molecules and upregulation of synaptic molecules in the transition from developing to mature PNs. A proteome-instructed in\ vivo screen identified 20 cell-surface molecules regulating neural circuit assembly, many of which belong to evolutionarily conserved protein families not previously linked to neural development. Genetic analysis further revealed that the lipoprotein receptor LRP1 cell-autonomously controls PN dendrite targeting, contributing to the formation of a precise olfactory map. These findings highlight the power of temporally resolved in situ cell-surface proteomic profiling in discovering regulators of brain wiring.

}, keywords = {Animals, Axons, Brain, Dendrites, Drosophila melanogaster, Drosophila Proteins, Gene Expression Profiling, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Membrane Proteins, Neurogenesis, Olfactory Nerve, Olfactory Pathways, Olfactory Receptor Neurons, Proteomics, Receptors, Lipoprotein, Smell}, issn = {1097-4172}, doi = {10.1016/j.cell.2019.12.029}, author = {Li, Jiefu and Han, Shuo and Li, Hongjie and Udeshi, Namrata D and Svinkina, Tanya and Mani, D R and Xu, Chuanyun and Guajardo, Ricardo and Xie, Qijing and Li, Tongchao and Luginbuhl, David J and Wu, Bing and McLaughlin, Colleen N and Xie, Anthony and Kaewsapsak, Pornchai and Quake, Stephen R and Carr, Steven A and Ting, Alice Y and Luo, Liqun} } @article {65738, title = {The mind of a mouse.}, journal = {Cell}, volume = {182}, year = {2020}, month = {2020 Sep 17}, pages = {1372-1376}, abstract = {

Large scientific projects in genomics and astronomy are influential not because they answer any single question but because they enable investigation of continuously arising new questions from the same data-rich sources. Advances in automated mapping of the brain{\textquoteright}s synaptic connections (connectomics) suggest that the complicated circuits underlying brain function are ripe for analysis. We discuss benefits of mapping a mouse brain at the level of synapses.

}, issn = {1097-4172}, doi = {10.1016/j.cell.2020.08.010}, author = {Abbott, Larry F and Bock, Davi D and Callaway, Edward M and Denk, Winfried and Dulac, Catherine and Fairhall, Adrienne L and Fiete, Ila and Harris, Kristen M and Helmstaedter, Moritz and Jain, Viren and Kasthuri, Narayanan and LeCun, Yann and Lichtman, Jeff W and Littlewood, Peter B and Luo, Liqun and Maunsell, John H R and Reid, R Clay and Rosen, Bruce R and Rubin, Gerald M and Sejnowski, Terrence J and Seung, H Sebastian and Svoboda, Karel and Tank, David W and Tsao, Doris and Van Essen, David C} } @article {68427, title = {Nurturing Undergraduate Researchers in Biomedical Sciences.}, journal = {Cell}, volume = {182}, year = {2020}, month = {07/2020}, pages = {1-4}, abstract = {

Undergraduate researchers are the next-generation scientists. Here, we call for more attention from our community to the proper training of undergraduates in biomedical research laboratories. By dissecting common pitfalls, we suggest how to better mentor undergraduates and prepare them for flourishing careers.

}, keywords = {Biomedical Research, Communication, Mentoring, Mentors, Research Personnel}, issn = {1097-4172}, doi = {10.1016/j.cell.2020.05.008}, author = {Li, Jiefu and Luo, Liqun} } @article {68428, title = {Single-Cell Transcriptomes Reveal Diverse Regulatory Strategies for Olfactory Receptor Expression and Axon Targeting.}, journal = {Curr Biol}, volume = {30}, year = {2020}, month = {04/2020}, pages = {1189-1198.e5}, abstract = {

The regulatory mechanisms by which neurons coordinate their physiology and connectivity are not well understood. The Drosophila olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs) provide an excellent system to investigate this question. Each ORN type expresses a unique olfactory receptor, or a combination thereof, and sends their axons to a stereotyped glomerulus. Using single-cell RNA sequencing, we identified 33 transcriptomic clusters for ORNs and mapped 20 to their glomerular types, demonstrating that transcriptomic clusters correspond well with anatomically and physiologically defined ORN types. Each ORN type expresses hundreds of transcription factors. Transcriptome-instructed genetic analyses revealed that (1) one broadly expressed transcription factor (Acj6) only regulates olfactory receptor expression in one ORN type and only wiring specificity in another type, (2) one type-restricted transcription factor (Forkhead) only regulates receptor expression, and (3) another type-restricted transcription factor (Unplugged) regulates both events. Thus, ORNs utilize diverse strategies and complex regulatory networks to coordinate their physiology and connectivity.

}, keywords = {Animals, Axons, Drosophila melanogaster, Drosophila Proteins, Forkhead Transcription Factors, Homeodomain Proteins, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Olfactory Receptor Neurons, POU Domain Factors, Receptors, Odorant, Single-Cell Analysis, Smell, Transcriptome}, issn = {1879-0445}, doi = {10.1016/j.cub.2020.01.049}, author = {Li, Hongjie and Li, Tongchao and Horns, Felix and Li, Jiefu and Xie, Qijing and Xu, Chuanyun and Wu, Bing and Kebschull, Justus M and McLaughlin, Colleen N and Kolluru, Sai Saroja and Jones, Robert C and Vacek, David and Xie, Anthony and Luginbuhl, David J and Quake, Stephen R and Luo, Liqun} } @article {68431, title = {Functional divergence of Plexin B structural motifs in distinct steps of olfactory circuit assembly.}, journal = {Elife}, volume = {8}, year = {2019}, month = {06/2019}, abstract = {

Plexins exhibit multitudinous, evolutionarily conserved functions in neural development. How Plexins employ their diverse structural motifs in vivo to perform distinct roles is unclear. We previously reported that Plexin B (PlexB) controls multiple steps during the assembly of the olfactory circuit (Li et al., 2018b). Here, we systematically mutagenized structural motifs of PlexB and examined the function of these variants in these multiple steps: axon fasciculation, trajectory choice, and synaptic partner selection. We found that the extracellular Sema domain is essential for all three steps, the catalytic site of the intracellular RapGAP is engaged in none, and the intracellular GTPase-binding motifs are essential for trajectory choice and synaptic partner selection, but are dispensable for fasciculation. Moreover, extracellular PlexB cleavage serves as a regulatory mechanism of PlexB signaling. Thus, the divergent roles of PlexB motifs in distinct steps of neural development contribute to its functional versatility in neural circuit assembly.

}, keywords = {Animals, Animals, Genetically Modified, Axons, Drosophila melanogaster, Drosophila Proteins, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Neurogenesis, Olfactory Bulb, Receptors, Cell Surface, Semaphorins, Signal Transduction, Smell}, issn = {2050-084X}, doi = {10.7554/eLife.48594}, author = {Guajardo, Ricardo and Luginbuhl, David J and Han, Shuo and Luo, Liqun and Li, Jiefu} } @article {64871, title = {Thirst regulates motivated behavior through modulation of brainwide neural population dynamics.}, journal = {Science}, volume = {364}, year = {2019}, month = {2019 Apr 04}, pages = {253}, abstract = {

Physiological needs produce motivational drives, such as thirst and hunger, that regulate behaviors essential to survival. Hypothalamic neurons sense these needs and must coordinate relevant brainwide neuronal activity to produce the appropriate behavior. We studied dynamics from ~24,000 neurons in 34 brain regions during thirst-motivated choice behavior, as mice consumed water and became sated. Water-predicting sensory cues elicited activity that rapidly spread throughout the brain of thirsty animals. These dynamics were gated by a brainwide mode of population activity that encoded motivational state. Focal optogenetic activation of hypothalamic thirst-sensing neurons, after satiation, returned global activity to the pre-satiation state. Thus, motivational states specify initial conditions determining how a brainwide dynamical system transforms sensory input into behavioral output.

}, issn = {1095-9203}, doi = {10.1126/science.aav3932}, author = {Allen, William E and Chen, Michael Z and Pichamoorthy, Nandini and Tien, Rebecca H and Pachitariu, Marius and Luo, Liqun and Deisseroth, Karl} } @article {68430, title = {Transsynaptic Fish-lips signaling prevents misconnections between nonsynaptic partner olfactory neurons.}, journal = {Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A}, volume = {116}, year = {2019}, month = {08/2019}, pages = {16068-16073}, abstract = {

Our understanding of the mechanisms of neural circuit assembly is far from complete. Identification of wiring molecules with novel mechanisms of action will provide insights into how complex and heterogeneous neural circuits assemble during development. In the olfactory system, 50 classes of olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs) make precise synaptic connections with 50 classes of partner projection neurons (PNs). Here, we performed an RNA interference screen for cell surface molecules and identified the leucine-rich repeat-containing transmembrane protein known as Fish-lips (Fili) as a novel wiring molecule in the assembly of the olfactory circuit. Fili contributes to the precise axon and dendrite targeting of a small subset of ORN and PN classes, respectively. Cell-type-specific expression and genetic analyses suggest that Fili sends a transsynaptic repulsive signal to neurites of nonpartner classes that prevents their targeting to inappropriate glomeruli in the antennal lobe.

}, keywords = {Animals, Axons, Dendrites, Drosophila melanogaster, Drosophila Proteins, Leucine-Rich Repeat Proteins, Membrane Proteins, Mutation, Olfactory Receptor Neurons, Phenotype, Proteins, Signal Transduction, Synapses}, issn = {1091-6490}, doi = {10.1073/pnas.1905832116}, author = {Xie, Qijing and Wu, Bing and Li, Jiefu and Xu, Chuanyun and Li, Hongjie and Luginbuhl, David J and Wang, Xin and Ward, Alex and Luo, Liqun} } @article {49154, title = {Genetic dissection of neural circuits: a decade of progress}, journal = {Neuron}, volume = {98}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 Apr 18}, pages = {256-81}, abstract = {

Tremendous progress has been made since\ Neuron\ published our Primer on genetic dissection of neural circuits 10 years ago. Since then, cell-type-specific anatomical, neurophysiological, and perturbation studies have been carried out in a multitude of invertebrate and vertebrate organisms, linking neurons and circuits to behavioral functions. New methods allow systematic classification of cell types and provide genetic access to diverse neuronal types for studies of connectivity and neural coding during behavior. Here we evaluate key advances over the past decade and discuss future directions.

}, doi = {10.1016/j.neuron.2018.03.040}, author = {Luo, Liqun and Callaway, Edward M and Svoboda, Karel} } @article {68435, title = {Linking neuronal lineage and wiring specificity.}, journal = {Neural Dev}, volume = {13}, year = {2018}, month = {04/2018}, pages = {5}, abstract = {

Brain function requires precise neural circuit assembly during development. Establishing a functional circuit involves multiple coordinated steps ranging from neural cell fate specification to proper matching between pre- and post-synaptic partners. How neuronal lineage and birth timing influence wiring specificity remains an open question. Recent findings suggest that the relationships between lineage, birth timing, and wiring specificity vary in different neuronal circuits. In this review, we summarize our current understanding of the cellular, molecular, and developmental mechanisms linking neuronal lineage and birth timing to wiring specificity in a few specific systems in Drosophila and mice, and review different methods employed to explore these mechanisms.

}, keywords = {Animals, Brain, Cell Lineage, Neural Pathways, Neurons}, issn = {1749-8104}, doi = {10.1186/s13064-018-0102-0}, author = {Li, Hongjie and Shuster, S Andrew and Li, Jiefu and Luo, Liqun} } @article {68432, title = { Stepwise wiring of the Drosophila olfactory map requires specific Plexin B levels}, journal = {Elife}, volume = {7}, year = {2018}, month = {08/2018}, abstract = {

The precise assembly of a neural circuit involves many consecutive steps. The conflict between a limited number of wiring molecules and the complexity of the neural network impels each molecule to execute multiple functions at different steps. Here, we examined the cell-type specific distribution of endogenous levels of axon guidance receptor Plexin B (PlexB) in the developing antennal lobe, the first olfactory processing center in . We found that different classes of olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs) express PlexB at different levels in two wiring steps - axonal trajectory choice and subsequent target selection. In line with its temporally distinct patterns, the proper levels of PlexB control both steps in succession. Genetic interactions further revealed that the effect of high-level PlexB is antagonized by its canonical partner Sema2b. Thus, PlexB plays a multifaceted role in instructing the assembly of the olfactory circuit through temporally-regulated expression patterns and expression level-dependent effects.

}, keywords = {Animals, Arthropod Antennae, Axons, Drosophila melanogaster, Drosophila Proteins, Models, Biological, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Olfactory Receptor Neurons, Receptors, Cell Surface, Smell}, issn = {2050-084X}, doi = {10.7554/eLife.39088}, author = {Li, Jiefu and Guajardo, Ricardo and Xu, Chuanyun and Wu, Bing and Li, Hongjie and Li, Tongchao and Luginbuhl, David J and Xie, Xiaojun and Luo, Liqun} } @article {48267, title = {A brainstem-spinal cord inhibitory circuit for mechanical pain modulation by GABA and Enkephalins.}, journal = {Neuron}, volume = {93}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 Jan 31}, pages = {822-39}, abstract = {

Pain thresholds are, in part, set as a function of emotional and internal states by descending modulation of nociceptive transmission in the spinal cord. Neurons of the rostral ventromedial medulla (RVM) are thought to critically contribute to this process; however, the neural circuits and synaptic mechanisms by which distinct populations of RVM neurons facilitate or diminish pain remain elusive. Here we used in\ vivo opto/chemogenetic manipulations and trans-synaptic tracing of genetically identified dorsal horn and RVM neurons to uncover an RVM-spinal cord-primary afferent circuit controlling pain thresholds. Unexpectedly, we found that RVM GABAergic neurons facilitate mechanical pain by inhibiting dorsal horn enkephalinergic/GABAergic interneurons. We further demonstrate that these interneurons gate sensory inputs and control pain through temporally coordinated enkephalin- and GABA-mediated presynaptic inhibition of somatosensory neurons. Our results uncover a descending disynaptic inhibitory circuit that facilitates mechanical pain, is engaged during stress, and could be targeted to establish higher pain thresholds.

}, issn = {1097-4199}, doi = {10.1016/j.neuron.2017.01.008}, author = {Fran{\c c}ois, Amaury and Low, Sarah A and Sypek, Elizabeth I and Christensen, Amelia J and Sotoudeh, Chaudy and Beier, Kevin T and Ramakrishnan, Charu and Ritola, Kimberly D and Sharif-Naeini, Reza and Deisseroth, Karl and Delp, Scott L and Malenka, Robert C and Luo, Liqun and Hantman, Adam W and Scherrer, Gr{\'e}gory} } @article {68437, title = {Classifying Drosophila Olfactory Projection Neuron Subtypes by Single-Cell RNA Sequencing.}, journal = {Cell}, volume = {171}, year = {2017}, month = {11/2017}, pages = {1206-1220.e22}, abstract = {

The definition of neuronal type and how it relates to the transcriptome are open questions. Drosophila olfactory projection neurons (PNs) are among the best-characterized neuronal types: different PN classes target dendrites to distinct olfactory glomeruli, while PNs of the same class exhibit indistinguishable anatomical and physiological properties. Using single-cell RNA sequencing, we comprehensively characterized the transcriptomes of most PN classes and unequivocally mapped transcriptomes to specific olfactory function for six classes. Transcriptomes of\ closely related PN classes exhibit the largest differences during circuit assembly but become indistinguishable in adults, suggesting that neuronal subtype diversity peaks during development. Transcription factors and cell-surface molecules are the most differentially expressed genes between classes and are highly informative in encoding cell identity, enabling us to identify a new lineage-specific transcription factor that instructs PN dendrite targeting. These findings establish that neuronal transcriptomic identity corresponds with anatomical and physiological identity defined by connectivity and function.

}, keywords = {Animals, Brain, Cluster Analysis, Dendrites, Drosophila melanogaster, Gene Expression Profiling, Neurons, Olfactory Bulb, Organ Specificity, Pupa, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Single-Cell Analysis, Transcription Factors}, issn = {1097-4172}, doi = {10.1016/j.cell.2017.10.019}, author = {Li, Hongjie and Horns, Felix and Wu, Bing and Xie, Qijing and Li, Jiefu and Li, Tongchao and Luginbuhl, David J and Quake, Stephen R and Luo, Liqun} } @article {68439, title = {Fibroblast growth factor signaling instructs ensheathing glia wrapping of olfactory glomeruli.}, journal = {Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A}, volume = {114}, year = {2017}, month = {07/2017}, pages = {7505-7512}, abstract = {

The formation of complex but highly organized neural circuits requires interactions between neurons and glia. During the assembly of the olfactory circuit, 50 olfactory receptor neuron (ORN) classes and 50 projection neuron (PN) classes form synaptic connections in 50 glomerular compartments in the antennal lobe, each of which represents a discrete olfactory information-processing channel. Each compartment is separated from the adjacent compartments by membranous processes from ensheathing glia. Here we show that Thisbe, an FGF released from olfactory neurons, particularly from local interneurons, instructs ensheathing glia to wrap each glomerulus. The Heartless FGF receptor acts cell-autonomously in ensheathing glia to regulate process extension so as to insulate each neuropil compartment. Overexpressing Thisbe in ORNs or PNs causes overwrapping of the glomeruli their axons or dendrites target. Failure to establish the FGF-dependent glia structure disrupts precise ORN axon targeting and discrete glomerular formation.

}, keywords = {Animals, Animals, Genetically Modified, Axons, Drosophila, Drosophila Proteins, Fibroblast Growth Factors, Genotype, Microscopy, Confocal, Neuroglia, Neuropil, Olfactory Bulb, Olfactory Pathways, Olfactory Receptor Neurons, Signal Transduction}, issn = {1091-6490}, doi = {10.1073/pnas.1706533114}, author = {Wu, Bing and Li, Jiefu and Chou, Ya-Hui and Luginbuhl, David and Luo, Liqun} } @article {68438, title = {Neurobiology: A bitter-sweet symphony.}, journal = {Nature}, volume = {548}, year = {2017}, month = {08/2017}, pages = {285-287}, abstract = {

No abstract available.

}, keywords = {Humans, Neurobiology, Taste}, issn = {1476-4687}, doi = {10.1038/nature23537}, author = {Li, Jiefu and Luo, Liqun} } @article {68447, title = {A transcriptional reporter of intracellular Ca(2+) in Drosophila.}, journal = {Nat Neurosci}, volume = {18}, year = {2015}, month = {06/2015}, pages = {917-25}, abstract = {

Intracellular Ca(2+) is a widely used neuronal activity indicator. Here we describe a transcriptional reporter of intracellular Ca(2+) (TRIC) in Drosophila that uses a binary expression system to report Ca(2+)-dependent interactions between calmodulin and its target peptide. We found that in vitro assays predicted in vivo properties of TRIC and that TRIC signals in sensory systems depend on neuronal activity. TRIC was able to quantitatively monitor neuronal responses that changed slowly, such as those of neuropeptide F-expressing neurons to sexual deprivation and neuroendocrine pars intercerebralis cells to food and arousal. Furthermore, TRIC-induced expression of a neuronal silencer in nutrient-activated cells enhanced stress resistance, providing a proof of principle that TRIC can be used for circuit manipulation. Thus, TRIC facilitates the monitoring and manipulation of neuronal activity, especially those reflecting slow changes in physiological states that are poorly captured by existing methods. TRIC{\textquoteright}s modular design should enable optimization and adaptation to other organisms.

}, keywords = {Animals, Calcium, Calcium Signaling, Cells, Cultured, Drosophila, Molecular Sequence Data, Mutagenesis, Neural Pathways, Olfactory Pathways, Optic Lobe, Nonmammalian, Stress, Psychological, Synaptic Transmission, Visual Pathways}, issn = {1546-1726}, doi = {10.1038/nn.4016}, author = {Gao, Xiaojing J and Riabinina, Olena and Li, Jiefu and Potter, Christopher J and Clandinin, Thomas R and Luo, Liqun} } @article {2755, title = {A combinatorial semaphorin code instructs the initial steps of sensory circuit assembly in the Drosophila CNS.}, journal = {Neuron}, volume = {70}, year = {2011}, month = {2011 Apr 28}, pages = {281-98}, abstract = {

Longitudinal axon fascicles within the Drosophila embryonic CNS provide connections between body segments and are required for coordinated neural signaling along the anterior-posterior axis. We show here that establishment of select CNS longitudinal tracts and formation of precise mechanosensory afferent innervation to the same CNS region are coordinately regulated by the secreted semaphorins Sema-2a and Sema-2b. Both Sema-2a and Sema-2b utilize the same neuronal receptor, plexin B (PlexB), but serve distinct guidance functions. Localized Sema-2b attraction promotes the initial assembly of a subset of CNS longitudinal projections and subsequent targeting of chordotonal sensory afferent axons to these same longitudinal connectives, whereas broader Sema-2a repulsion serves to prevent aberrant innervation. In the absence of Sema-2b or PlexB, chordotonal afferent connectivity within the CNS is severely disrupted, resulting in specific larval behavioral deficits. These results reveal that distinct semaphorin-mediated guidance functions converge at PlexB and are critical for functional neural circuit assembly.

}, issn = {1097-4199}, doi = {10.1016/j.neuron.2011.02.050}, author = {Wu, Zhuhao and Sweeney, Lora B and Ayoob, Joseph C and Chak, Kayam and Andreone, Benjamin J and Ohyama, Tomoko and Kerr, Rex and Luo, Liqun and Zlatic, Marta and Kolodkin, Alex L} } @article {1449, title = {Cortical representations of olfactory input by trans-synaptic tracing.}, journal = {Nature}, volume = {472}, year = {2010}, month = {2010 Dec 22}, pages = {191-6}, abstract = {

In the mouse, each class of olfactory receptor neurons expressing a given odorant receptor has convergent axonal projections to two specific glomeruli in the olfactory bulb, thereby creating an odour map. However, it is unclear how this map is represented in the olfactory cortex. Here we combine rabies-virus-dependent retrograde mono-trans-synaptic labelling with genetics to control the location, number and type of {\textquoteright}starter{\textquoteright} cortical neurons, from which we trace their presynaptic neurons. We find that individual cortical neurons receive input from multiple mitral cells representing broadly distributed glomeruli. Different cortical areas represent the olfactory bulb input differently. For example, the cortical amygdala preferentially receives dorsal olfactory bulb input, whereas the piriform cortex samples the whole olfactory bulb without obvious bias. These differences probably reflect different functions of these cortical areas in mediating innate odour preference or associative memory. The trans-synaptic labelling method described here should be widely applicable to mapping connections throughout the mouse nervous system.

}, issn = {1476-4687}, doi = {10.1038/nature09714}, author = {Miyamichi, Kazunari and Amat, Fernando and Moussavi, Farshid and Wang, Chen and Wickersham, Ian and Wall, Nicholas R and Taniguchi, Hiroki and Tasic, Bosiljka and Huang, Z Josh and He, Zhigang and Callaway, Edward M and Horowitz, Mark A and Luo, Liqun} } @article {782, title = {Lineage-specific effects of Notch/Numb signaling in post-embryonic development of the Drosophila brain.}, journal = {Development}, volume = {137}, year = {2010}, month = {2010 Jan}, pages = {43-51}, abstract = {

Numb can antagonize Notch signaling to diversify the fates of sister cells. We report here that paired sister cells acquire different fates in all three Drosophila neuronal lineages that make diverse types of antennal lobe projection neurons (PNs). Only one in each pair of postmitotic neurons survives into the adult stage in both anterodorsal (ad) and ventral (v) PN lineages. Notably, Notch signaling specifies the PN fate in the vPN lineage but promotes programmed cell death in the missing siblings in the adPN lineage. In addition, Notch/Numb-mediated binary sibling fates underlie the production of PNs and local interneurons from common precursors in the lAL lineage. Furthermore, Numb is needed in the lateral but not adPN or vPN lineages to prevent the appearance of ectopic neuroblasts and to ensure proper self-renewal of neural progenitors. These lineage-specific outputs of Notch/Numb signaling show that a universal mechanism of binary fate decision can be utilized to govern diverse neural sibling differentiations.

}, keywords = {Animals, Apoptosis, Biological, Brain, Developmental, Drosophila, Drosophila Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Immunohistochemistry, Juvenile Hormones, Models, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Neurons, Notch, POU Domain Factors, Receptors, Signal Transduction}, issn = {1477-9129}, doi = {10.1242/dev.041699}, author = {Lin, Suewei and Lai, Sen-Lin and Yu, Huang-Hsiang and Chihara, Takahiro and Luo, Liqun and Lee, Tzumin} } @article {4257, title = {Genetic dissection of neural circuits.}, journal = {Neuron}, volume = {57}, year = {2008}, month = {2008 Mar 13}, pages = {634-60}, abstract = {

Understanding the principles of information processing in neural circuits requires systematic characterization of the participating cell types and their connections, and the ability to measure and perturb their activity. Genetic approaches promise to bring experimental access to complex neural systems, including genetic stalwarts such as the fly and mouse, but also to nongenetic systems such as primates. Together with anatomical and physiological methods, cell-type-specific expression of protein markers and sensors and transducers will be critical to construct circuit diagrams and to measure the activity of genetically defined neurons. Inactivation and activation of genetically defined cell types will establish causal relationships between activity in specific groups of neurons, circuit function, and animal behavior. Genetic analysis thus promises to reveal the logic of the neural circuits in complex brains that guide behaviors. Here we review progress in the genetic analysis of neural circuits and discuss directions for future research and development.

}, keywords = {Animals, Gene Expression Regulation, Humans, Nerve Net, Neural Pathways, Neurons}, issn = {1097-4199}, doi = {10.1016/j.neuron.2008.01.002}, author = {Luo, Liqun and Callaway, Edward M and Svoboda, Karel} } @article {2679, title = {Genomic analysis of Drosophila neuronal remodeling: a role for the RNA-binding protein Boule as a negative regulator of axon pruning.}, journal = {The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience}, volume = {28}, year = {2008}, month = {2008 Jun 11}, pages = {6092-103}, abstract = {

Drosophila mushroom body (MB) gamma neurons undergo axon pruning during metamorphosis through a process of localized degeneration of specific axon branches. Developmental axon degeneration is initiated by the steroid hormone ecdysone, acting through a nuclear receptor complex composed of USP (ultraspiracle) and EcRB1 (ecdysone receptor B1) to regulate gene expression in MB gamma neurons. To identify ecdysone-dependent gene expression changes in MB gamma neurons at the onset of axon pruning, we use laser capture microdissection to isolate wild-type and mutant MB neurons in which EcR (ecdysone receptor) activity is genetically blocked, and analyze expression changes by microarray. We identify several molecular pathways that are regulated in MB neurons by ecdysone. The most striking observation is the upregulation of genes involved in the UPS (ubiquitin-proteasome system), which is cell autonomously required for gamma neuron pruning. In addition, we characterize the function of Boule, an evolutionarily conserved RNA-binding protein previously implicated in spermatogenesis in flies and vertebrates. boule expression is downregulated by ecdysone in MB neurons at the onset of pruning, and forced expression of Boule in MB gamma neurons is sufficient to inhibit axon pruning. This activity is dependent on the RNA-binding domain of Boule and a conserved DAZ (deleted in azoospermia) domain implicated in interactions with other RNA-binding proteins. However, loss of Boule does not result in obvious defects in axon pruning or morphogenesis of MB neurons, suggesting that it acts redundantly with other ecdyonse-regulated genes. We propose a novel function for Boule in the CNS as a negative regulator of developmental axon pruning.

}, keywords = {Animals, Antigens, Axons, CD8, Developmental, Drosophila, Drosophila Proteins, Ecdysone, Gene Expression Regulation, Genetically Modified, Genomics, Green Fluorescent Proteins, Larva, Microarray Analysis, Mushroom Bodies, Mutation, Neurons, Receptors, RNA-Binding Proteins, Steroid}, issn = {1529-2401}, doi = {10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0677-08.2008}, author = {Hoopfer, Eric D and Penton, Andrea and Watts, Ryan J and Luo, Liqun} } @article {6250, title = {Lola regulates Drosophila olfactory projection neuron identity and targeting specificity.}, journal = {Neural Development}, volume = {2}, year = {2007}, month = {2007 Jul 16}, pages = {14}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Precise connections of neural circuits can be specified by genetic programming. In the Drosophila olfactory system, projection neurons (PNs) send dendrites to single glomeruli in the antenna lobe (AL) based upon lineage and birth order and send axons with stereotyped terminations to higher olfactory centers. These decisions are likely specified by a PN-intrinsic transcriptional code that regulates the expression of cell-surface molecules to instruct wiring specificity. RESULTS: We find that the loss of longitudinals lacking (lola), which encodes a BTB-Zn-finger transcription factor with 20 predicted splice isoforms, results in wiring defects in both axons and dendrites of all lineages of PNs. RNA in situ hybridization and quantitative RT-PCR suggest that most if not all lola isoforms are expressed in all PNs, but different isoforms are expressed at widely varying levels. Overexpression of individual lola isoforms fails to rescue the lola null phenotypes and causes additional phenotypes. Loss of lola also results in ectopic expression of Gal4 drivers in multiple cell types and in the loss of transcription factor gene lim1 expression in ventral PNs. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that lola is required for wiring of axons and dendrites of most PN classes, and suggest a need for its molecular diversity. Expression pattern changes of Gal4 drivers in lola-/- clones imply that lola normally represses the expression of these regulatory elements in a subset of the cells surrounding the AL. We propose that Lola functions as a general transcription factor that regulates the expression of multiple genes ultimately controlling PN identity and wiring specificity.

}, keywords = {Animals, Body Patterning, Brain, Cell Differentiation, Dendrites, Developmental, Drosophila melanogaster, Drosophila Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Growth Cones, Larva, Olfactory Pathways, Olfactory Receptor Neurons, Regulatory Elements, Transcription Factors, Transcriptional, Transcriptional Activation}, issn = {1749-8104}, doi = {10.1186/1749-8104-2-14}, author = {Spletter, Maria Lynn and Liu, Jian and Liu, Justin and Su, Helen and Giniger, Edward and Komiyama, Takaki and Quake, Stephen and Luo, Liqun} } @article {2680, title = {Wlds protection distinguishes axon degeneration following injury from naturally occurring developmental pruning.}, journal = {Neuron}, volume = {50}, year = {2006}, month = {2006 Jun 15}, pages = {883-95}, abstract = {

Axon pruning by degeneration remodels exuberant axonal connections and is widely required for the development of proper circuitry in the nervous system from insects to mammals. Developmental axon degeneration morphologically resembles injury-induced Wallerian degeneration, suggesting similar underlying mechanisms. As previously reported for mice, we show that Wlds protein substantially delays Wallerian degeneration in flies. Surprisingly, Wlds has no effect on naturally occurring developmental axon degeneration in flies or mice, although it protects against injury-induced degeneration of the same axons at the same developmental age. By contrast, the ubiquitin-proteasome system is intrinsically required for both developmental and injury-induced axon degeneration. We also show that the glial cell surface receptor Draper is required for efficient clearance of axon fragments during developmental axon degeneration, similar to its function in injury-induced degeneration. Thus, mechanistically, naturally occurring developmental axon pruning by degeneration and injury-induced axon degeneration differ significantly in early steps, but may converge onto a common execution pathway.

}, keywords = {Animals, Axons, Developmental, Drosophila, Drosophila Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Genetically Modified, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Wallerian Degeneration}, issn = {0896-6273}, doi = {10.1016/j.neuron.2006.05.013}, author = {Hoopfer, Eric D and McLaughlin, Todd and Watts, Ryan J and Schuldiner, Oren and O{\textquoteright}Leary, Dennis D M and Luo, Liqun} } @article {2682, title = {Axon pruning during Drosophila metamorphosis: evidence for local degeneration and requirement of the ubiquitin-proteasome system.}, journal = {Neuron}, volume = {38}, year = {2003}, month = {2003 Jun 19}, pages = {871-85}, abstract = {

Axon pruning is widely used for the refinement of neural circuits in both vertebrates and invertebrates, and may also contribute to the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative diseases. However, little is known about the cellular and molecular mechanisms of axon pruning. We use the stereotyped pruning of gamma neurons of the Drosophila mushroom bodies (MB) during metamorphosis to investigate these mechanisms. Detailed time course analyses indicate that MB axon pruning is mediated by local degeneration rather than retraction and that the disruption of the microtubule cytoskeleton precedes axon pruning. In addition, multiple lines of genetic evidence demonstrate an intrinsic role of the ubiquitin-proteasome system in axon pruning; for example, loss-of-function mutations of the ubiquitin activating enzyme (E1) or proteasome subunits in MB neurons block axon pruning. Our findings suggest that some forms of axon pruning during development may share similarities with degeneration of axons in response to injury.

}, keywords = {Animals, Axons, Biological, Cell Adhesion Molecules, Cysteine Endopeptidases, Cytoskeletal Proteins, Cytoskeleton, Cytosol, Drosophila, Endocytosis, Endopeptidases, Gene Expression, Ligases, Metamorphosis, Microtubules, Multienzyme Complexes, Mutation, Nerve Degeneration, Neurons, Proteasome Endopeptidase Complex, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Synapses, Transfection, Ubiquitin, Ubiquitin-Activating Enzymes, Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases}, issn = {0896-6273}, author = {Watts, Ryan J and Hoopfer, Eric D and Luo, Liqun} } @article {2681, title = {Involvement of the ubiquitin-proteasome system in the early stages of wallerian degeneration.}, journal = {Neuron}, volume = {39}, year = {2003}, month = {2003 Jul 17}, pages = {217-25}, abstract = {

Local axon degeneration is a common pathological feature of many neurodegenerative diseases and peripheral neuropathies. While it is believed to operate with an apoptosis-independent molecular program, the underlying molecular mechanisms are largely unknown. In this study, we used the degeneration of transected axons, termed "Wallerian degeneration," as a model to examine the possible involvement of the ubiquitin proteasome system (UPS). Inhibiting UPS activity by both pharmacological and genetic means profoundly delays axon degeneration both in vitro and in vivo. In addition, we found that the fragmentation of microtubules is the earliest detectable change in axons undergoing Wallerian degeneration, which among other degenerative events, can be delayed by proteasome inhibitors. Interestingly, similar to transected axons, degeneration of axons from nerve growth factor (NGF)-deprived sympathetic neurons could also be suppressed by proteasome inhibitors. Our findings suggest a possibility that inhibiting UPS activity may serve to retard axon degeneration in pathological conditions.

}, keywords = {Amino Acids, Animal, Animals, Axons, Benzimidazoles, Blotting, Calpain, Cells, Chelating Agents, Cultured, Cysteine Endopeptidases, Cysteine Proteinase Inhibitors, Cytoskeleton, Disease Models, Drug Interactions, Egtazic Acid, Endopeptidases, Ganglia, Immunohistochemistry, Leupeptins, Microtubules, Multienzyme Complexes, Nerve Growth Factor, Newborn, Optic Nerve, Optic Nerve Injuries, Peptide Fragments, Proteasome Endopeptidase Complex, Rats, Sympathetic, Time Factors, Tubulin, Ubiquitin, Wallerian Degeneration, Western}, issn = {0896-6273}, author = {Zhai, Qiwei and Wang, Jing and Kim, Anna and Liu, Qing and Watts, Ryan and Hoopfer, Eric and Mitchison, Timothy and Luo, Liqun and He, Zhigang} }