@article {6876, title = {Drosophila intermediate neural progenitors produce lineage-dependent related series of diverse neurons.}, journal = {Development}, volume = {141}, year = {2014}, month = {2014 Jan}, pages = {253-8}, abstract = {

Drosophila type II neuroblasts (NBs), like mammalian neural stem cells, deposit neurons through intermediate neural progenitors (INPs) that can each produce a series of neurons. Both type II NBs and INPs exhibit age-dependent expression of various transcription factors, potentially specifying an array of diverse neurons by combinatorial temporal patterning. Not knowing which mature neurons are made by specific INPs, however, conceals the actual variety of neuron types and limits further molecular studies. Here we mapped neurons derived from specific type II NB lineages and found that sibling INPs produced a morphologically similar but temporally regulated series of distinct neuron types. This suggests a common fate diversification program operating within each INP that is modulated by NB age to generate slightly different sets of diverse neurons based on the INP birth order. Analogous mechanisms might underlie the expansion of neuron diversity via INPs in mammalian brain.

}, keywords = {Animals, Brain, Cell Lineage, Drosophila, Genetically Modified, Models, Neural Stem Cells, Neurogenesis, Neurological}, issn = {1477-9129}, doi = {10.1242/dev.103069}, author = {Wang, Yu-Chun and Yang, Jacob S and Johnston, Rebecca and Ren, Qingzhong and Lee, Ying-Jou and Luan, Haojiang and Brody, Thomas and Odenwald, Ward F and Lee, Tzumin} } @article {6284, title = {Clonal development and organization of the adult Drosophila central brain.}, journal = {Current biology : CB}, volume = {23}, year = {2013}, month = {2013 Apr 22}, pages = {633-43}, abstract = {BACKGROUND: The insect brain can be divided into neuropils that are formed by neurites of both local and remote origin. The complexity of the interconnections obscures how these neuropils are established and interconnected through development. The Drosophila central brain develops from a fixed number of neuroblasts (NBs) that deposit neurons in regional clusters. RESULTS: By determining individual NB clones and pursuing their projections into specific neuropils, we unravel the regional development of the brain neural network. Exhaustive clonal analysis revealed 95 stereotyped neuronal lineages with characteristic cell-body locations and neurite trajectories. Most clones show complex projection patterns, but despite the complexity, neighboring clones often coinnervate the same local neuropil or neuropils and further target a restricted set of distant neuropils. CONCLUSIONS: These observations argue for regional clonal development of both neuropils and neuropil connectivity throughout the Drosophila central brain.}, issn = {1879-0445}, doi = {10.1016/j.cub.2013.02.057}, author = {Yu, Hung-Hsiang and Awasaki, Takeshi and Schroeder, Mark David and Long, Fuhui and Yang, Jacob S and He, Yisheng and Ding, Peng and Kao, Jui-Chun and Wu, Gloria Yueh-Yi and Peng, Hanchuan and Myers, Gene and Lee, Tzumin} } @article {6277, title = {Diverse neuronal lineages make stereotyped contributions to the Drosophila locomotor control center, the central complex.}, journal = {The Journal of Comparative Neurology}, volume = {521}, year = {2013}, month = {2013 Aug 15}, pages = {2645-62, Spc1}, abstract = {

The Drosophila central brain develops from a fixed number of neuroblasts. Each neuroblast makes a clone of neurons that exhibit common trajectories. Here we identified 15 distinct clones that carry larval-born neurons innervating the Drosophila central complex (CX), which consists of four midline structures including the protocerebral bridge (PB), fan-shaped body (FB), ellipsoid body (EB), and noduli (NO). Clonal analysis revealed that the small-field CX neurons, which establish intricate projections across different CX substructures, exist in four isomorphic groups that respectively derive from four complex posterior asense-negative lineages. In terms of the region-characteristic large-field CX neurons, we found that two lineages make PB neurons, 10 lineages produce FB neurons, three lineages generate EB neurons, and two lineages yield NO neurons. The diverse FB developmental origins reflect the discrete input pathways for different FB subcompartments. Clonal analysis enlightens both development and anatomy of the insect locomotor control center.

}, issn = {1096-9861}, doi = {10.1002/cne.23339}, author = {Yang, Jacob S and Awasaki, Takeshi and Yu, Hung-Hsiang and He, Yisheng and Ding, Peng and Kao, Jui-Chun and Lee, Tzumin} } @article {796, title = {Endodomain diversity in the Drosophila Dscam and its roles in neuronal morphogenesis.}, journal = {The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience}, volume = {29}, year = {2009}, month = {2009 Feb 11}, pages = {1904-14}, abstract = {

Drosophila Down syndrome cell adhesion molecule (Dscam) can be variably spliced to encode 152,064 distinct single-pass transmembrane proteins. In addition to 19,008 possible ectodomains and two alternative transmembrane segments, it may carry endodomains containing or lacking exons 19 and 23. Here, we determine the role of Dscam endodomain diversity in neural development. Dscam with full-length endodomain is largely restricted to embryogenesis. In contrast, most Dscams lack exons 19 and 23 at postembryonic stages. As implicated from the expression patterns, removal of Dscam exon 19-containing variants disrupts wiring of embryonic neurons while silencing of Dscam transcripts lacking exon 19 or exon 23 effectively blocks postembryonic neuronal morphogenesis. Furthermore, compared with exon 19-containing Dscam, transgenic Dscam without exon 19 is more efficiently targeted to neurites and more potently suppresses axon bifurcation in Dscam mutant neurons. In sum, Dscam with or without exon 19 in its endodomain is used to govern different stage-specific neuronal morphogenetic processes, possibly due to differences in protein targeting.

}, keywords = {Amino Acid Motifs, Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Cell Adhesion Molecules, Drosophila, Drosophila Proteins, Gene Targeting, Genetically Modified, Molecular Sequence Data, Morphogenesis, Neurogenesis, Neurons, Protein Structure, Tertiary}, issn = {1529-2401}, doi = {10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5743-08.2009}, author = {Yu, Hung-Hsiang and Yang, Jacob S and Wang, Jian and Huang, Yaling and Lee, Tzumin} } @article {793, title = {Specific Drosophila Dscam juxtamembrane variants control dendritic elaboration and axonal arborization.}, journal = {The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience}, volume = {27}, year = {2007}, month = {2007 Jun 20}, pages = {6723-8}, abstract = {

Drosophila Dscam isoforms are derived from two alternative transmembrane/juxtamembrane domains (TMs) in addition to thousands of ectodomain variants. Using a microRNA-based RNA interference technology, we selectively knocked down different subsets of Dscams containing either the exon 17.1- or exon 17.2-encoding TM. Eliminating Dscam[TM1] reduced Dscam expression but minimally affected postembryonic axonal morphogenesis. In contrast, depleting Dscam[TM2] blocked axon arborization. Further removal of Dscam[TM1] enhanced the loss-of-Dscam[TM2] axonal phenotypes. However, Dscam[TM1] primarily regulates dendritic development, as evidenced by the observations that removing Dscam[TM1] alone impeded elaboration of dendrites and that transgenic Dscam[TM1], but not Dscam[TM2], effectively rescued Dscam mutant dendritic phenotypes in mosaic organisms. These distinct Dscam functions can be attributed to the juxtamembrane regions of TMs that govern dendritic versus axonal targeting of Dscam as well. Together, we suggest that specific Drosophila Dscam juxtamembrane variants control dendritic elaboration and axonal arborization.

}, keywords = {Animals, Axons, Cell Adhesion Molecules, Dendrites, Drosophila, Drosophila Proteins, Genetic Variation, Genetically Modified, Membrane Proteins, Morphogenesis, Neural Cell Adhesion Molecules, Protein Isoforms}, issn = {1529-2401}, doi = {10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1517-07.2007}, author = {Shi, Lei and Yu, Hung-Hsiang and Yang, Jacob S and Lee, Tzumin} } @article {790, title = {Transmembrane/juxtamembrane domain-dependent Dscam distribution and function during mushroom body neuronal morphogenesis.}, journal = {Neuron}, volume = {43}, year = {2004}, month = {2004 Sep 2}, pages = {663-72}, abstract = {

Besides 19,008 possible ectodomains, Drosophila Dscam contains two alternative transmembrane/juxtamembrane segments, respectively, derived from exon 17.1 and exon 17.2. We wondered whether specific Dscam isoforms mediate formation and segregation of axonal branches in the Drosophila mushroom bodies (MBs). Removal of various subsets of the 12 exon 4s does not affect MB neuronal morphogenesis, while expression of a Dscam transgene only partially rescues Dscam mutant phenotypes. Interestingly, differential rescuing effects are observed between two Dscam transgenes that each possesses one of the two possible exon 17s. Axon bifurcation/segregation abnormalities are better rescued by the exon 17.2-containing transgene, but coexpression of both transgenes is required for rescuing mutant viability. Meanwhile, exon 17.1 targets ectopically expressed Dscam-GFP to dendrites while Dscam[exon 17.2]-GFP is enriched in axons; only Dscam[exon 17.2] affects MB axons. These results suggest that exon 17.1 is minimally involved in axonal morphogenesis and that morphogenesis of MB axons probably involves multiple distinct exon 17.2-containing Dscam isoforms.

}, keywords = {Alternative Splicing, Animals, Brain, Cell Adhesion Molecules, Cell Differentiation, Cell Membrane, Dendrites, Developmental, Drosophila melanogaster, Drosophila Proteins, Embryo, Exons, Gene Expression Regulation, Genetically Modified, Growth Cones, Larva, Morphogenesis, Mushroom Bodies, Mutation, Neurons, Nonmammalian, Protein Isoforms, Protein Structure, Proteins, Tertiary, Transgenes}, issn = {0896-6273}, doi = {10.1016/j.neuron.2004.06.033}, author = {Wang, Jian and Ma, Xiaojun and Yang, Jacob S and Zheng, Xiaoyan and Zugates, Christopher T and Lee, Ching-Hsien J and Lee, Tzumin} }