@article {65738, title = {The mind of a mouse.}, journal = {Cell}, volume = {182}, year = {2020}, month = {2020 Sep 17}, pages = {1372-1376}, abstract = {

Large scientific projects in genomics and astronomy are influential not because they answer any single question but because they enable investigation of continuously arising new questions from the same data-rich sources. Advances in automated mapping of the brain{\textquoteright}s synaptic connections (connectomics) suggest that the complicated circuits underlying brain function are ripe for analysis. We discuss benefits of mapping a mouse brain at the level of synapses.

}, issn = {1097-4172}, doi = {10.1016/j.cell.2020.08.010}, author = {Abbott, Larry F and Bock, Davi D and Callaway, Edward M and Denk, Winfried and Dulac, Catherine and Fairhall, Adrienne L and Fiete, Ila and Harris, Kristen M and Helmstaedter, Moritz and Jain, Viren and Kasthuri, Narayanan and LeCun, Yann and Lichtman, Jeff W and Littlewood, Peter B and Luo, Liqun and Maunsell, John H R and Reid, R Clay and Rosen, Bruce R and Rubin, Gerald M and Sejnowski, Terrence J and Seung, H Sebastian and Svoboda, Karel and Tank, David W and Tsao, Doris and Van Essen, David C} } @article {49154, title = {Genetic dissection of neural circuits: a decade of progress}, journal = {Neuron}, volume = {98}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 Apr 18}, pages = {256-81}, abstract = {

Tremendous progress has been made since\ Neuron\ published our Primer on genetic dissection of neural circuits 10 years ago. Since then, cell-type-specific anatomical, neurophysiological, and perturbation studies have been carried out in a multitude of invertebrate and vertebrate organisms, linking neurons and circuits to behavioral functions. New methods allow systematic classification of cell types and provide genetic access to diverse neuronal types for studies of connectivity and neural coding during behavior. Here we evaluate key advances over the past decade and discuss future directions.

}, doi = {10.1016/j.neuron.2018.03.040}, author = {Luo, Liqun and Callaway, Edward M and Svoboda, Karel} } @article {48275, title = {Optogenetics through windows on the brain in the nonhuman primate.}, journal = {Journal of neurophysiology}, volume = {110}, year = {2013}, month = {2013 Sep}, pages = {1455-67}, abstract = {

Optogenetics combines optics and genetics to control neuronal activity with cell-type specificity and millisecond temporal precision. Its use in model organisms such as rodents, Drosophila, and Caenorhabditis elegans is now well-established. However, application of this technology in nonhuman primates (NHPs) has been slow to develop. One key challenge has been the delivery of viruses and light to the brain through the thick dura mater of NHPs, which can only be penetrated with large-diameter devices that damage the brain. The opacity of the NHP dura prevents visualization of the underlying cortex, limiting the spatial precision of virus injections, electrophysiological recordings, and photostimulation. Here, we describe a new optogenetics approach in which the native dura is replaced with an optically transparent artificial dura. This artificial dura can be penetrated with fine glass micropipettes, enabling precisely targeted injections of virus into brain tissue with minimal damage to cortex. The expression of optogenetic agents can be monitored visually over time. Most critically, this optical window permits targeted, noninvasive photostimulation and concomitant measurements of neuronal activity via intrinsic signal imaging and electrophysiological recordings. We present results from both anesthetized-paralyzed (optical imaging) and awake-behaving NHPs (electrophysiology). The improvements over current methods made possible by the artificial dura should enable the widespread use of optogenetic tools in NHP research, a key step toward the development of therapies for neuropsychiatric and neurological diseases in humans.

}, keywords = {Animals, Brain, Dura Mater, Gene Transfer Techniques, Haplorhini, Neurosurgical Procedures, Optogenetics}, issn = {1522-1598}, doi = {10.1152/jn.00153.2013}, author = {Ruiz, Octavio and Lustig, Brian R and Nassi, Jonathan J and Cetin, Ali and Reynolds, John H and Albright, Thomas D and Callaway, Edward M and Stoner, Gene R and Roe, Anna W} } @article {1449, title = {Cortical representations of olfactory input by trans-synaptic tracing.}, journal = {Nature}, volume = {472}, year = {2010}, month = {2010 Dec 22}, pages = {191-6}, abstract = {

In the mouse, each class of olfactory receptor neurons expressing a given odorant receptor has convergent axonal projections to two specific glomeruli in the olfactory bulb, thereby creating an odour map. However, it is unclear how this map is represented in the olfactory cortex. Here we combine rabies-virus-dependent retrograde mono-trans-synaptic labelling with genetics to control the location, number and type of {\textquoteright}starter{\textquoteright} cortical neurons, from which we trace their presynaptic neurons. We find that individual cortical neurons receive input from multiple mitral cells representing broadly distributed glomeruli. Different cortical areas represent the olfactory bulb input differently. For example, the cortical amygdala preferentially receives dorsal olfactory bulb input, whereas the piriform cortex samples the whole olfactory bulb without obvious bias. These differences probably reflect different functions of these cortical areas in mediating innate odour preference or associative memory. The trans-synaptic labelling method described here should be widely applicable to mapping connections throughout the mouse nervous system.

}, issn = {1476-4687}, doi = {10.1038/nature09714}, author = {Miyamichi, Kazunari and Amat, Fernando and Moussavi, Farshid and Wang, Chen and Wickersham, Ian and Wall, Nicholas R and Taniguchi, Hiroki and Tasic, Bosiljka and Huang, Z Josh and He, Zhigang and Callaway, Edward M and Horowitz, Mark A and Luo, Liqun} } @article {4257, title = {Genetic dissection of neural circuits.}, journal = {Neuron}, volume = {57}, year = {2008}, month = {2008 Mar 13}, pages = {634-60}, abstract = {

Understanding the principles of information processing in neural circuits requires systematic characterization of the participating cell types and their connections, and the ability to measure and perturb their activity. Genetic approaches promise to bring experimental access to complex neural systems, including genetic stalwarts such as the fly and mouse, but also to nongenetic systems such as primates. Together with anatomical and physiological methods, cell-type-specific expression of protein markers and sensors and transducers will be critical to construct circuit diagrams and to measure the activity of genetically defined neurons. Inactivation and activation of genetically defined cell types will establish causal relationships between activity in specific groups of neurons, circuit function, and animal behavior. Genetic analysis thus promises to reveal the logic of the neural circuits in complex brains that guide behaviors. Here we review progress in the genetic analysis of neural circuits and discuss directions for future research and development.

}, keywords = {Animals, Gene Expression Regulation, Humans, Nerve Net, Neural Pathways, Neurons}, issn = {1097-4199}, doi = {10.1016/j.neuron.2008.01.002}, author = {Luo, Liqun and Callaway, Edward M and Svoboda, Karel} }