@article {2076, title = {Self-organization of the Escherichia coli chemotaxis network imaged with super-resolution light microscopy. (With commentary)}, journal = {PLoS Biology}, volume = {7}, year = {2009}, month = {2009 Jun 16}, pages = {e1000137}, abstract = {

The Escherichia coli chemotaxis network is a model system for biological signal processing. In E. coli, transmembrane receptors responsible for signal transduction assemble into large clusters containing several thousand proteins. These sensory clusters have been observed at cell poles and future division sites. Despite extensive study, it remains unclear how chemotaxis clusters form, what controls cluster size and density, and how the cellular location of clusters is robustly maintained in growing and dividing cells. Here, we use photoactivated localization microscopy (PALM) to map the cellular locations of three proteins central to bacterial chemotaxis (the Tar receptor, CheY, and CheW) with a precision of 15 nm. We find that cluster sizes are approximately exponentially distributed, with no characteristic cluster size. One-third of Tar receptors are part of smaller lateral clusters and not of the large polar clusters. Analysis of the relative cellular locations of 1.1 million individual proteins (from 326 cells) suggests that clusters form via stochastic self-assembly. The super-resolution PALM maps of E. coli receptors support the notion that stochastic self-assembly can create and maintain approximately periodic structures in biological membranes, without direct cytoskeletal involvement or active transport.

Commentary: Our goal as tool developers is to invent methods capable of uncovering new biological insights unobtainable by pre-existing technologies. A terrific example is given by this paper, where grad students Derek Greenfield and Ann McEvoy in Jan Liphardt{\textquoteright}s group at Berkeley used our PALM to image the size and position distributions of chemotaxis proteins in E. Coli with unprecedented precision and sensitivity. Their analysis revealed that the cluster sizes follow a stretched exponential distribution, and the density of clusters is highest furthest away from the largest (e.g., polar) clusters. Both observations support a model for passive self-assembly rather than active cytoskeletal assembly of the chemotaxis network.

}, keywords = {Bacterial Proteins, Biological, Cell Surface, Chemoreceptor Cells, Chemotaxis, Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli Proteins, Membrane Proteins, Microscopy, Models, Receptors, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Signal Transduction, Stochastic Processes}, issn = {1545-7885}, doi = {10.1371/journal.pbio.1000137}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19547746}, author = {Greenfield, Derek and McEvoy, Ann L and Shroff, Hari and Crooks, Gavin E and Wingreen, Ned S and Betzig, Eric and Liphardt, Jan} }