@article {6826, title = {Cellular and behavioral functions of fruitless isoforms in Drosophila courtship.}, journal = {Current Biology }, volume = {24}, year = {2014}, month = {2014 Feb 3}, pages = {242-51}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Male-specific products of the fruitless (fru) gene control the development and function of neuronal circuits that underlie male-specific behaviors in Drosophila, including courtship. Alternative splicing generates at least three distinct Fru isoforms, each containing a different zinc-finger domain. Here, we examine the expression and function of each of these isoforms. RESULTS: We show that most fru(+) cells express all three isoforms, yet each isoform has a distinct function in the elaboration of sexually dimorphic circuitry and behavior. The strongest impairment in courtship behavior is observed in fru(C) mutants, which fail to copulate, lack sine song, and do not generate courtship song in the absence of visual stimuli. Cellular dimorphisms in the fru circuit are dependent on Fru(C) rather than other single Fru isoforms. Removal of Fru(C) from the neuronal classes vAB3 or aSP4 leads to cell-autonomous feminization of arborizations and loss of courtship in the dark. CONCLUSIONS: These data map specific aspects of courtship behavior to the level of single fru isoforms and fru(+) cell types-an important step toward elucidating the chain of causality from gene to circuit to behavior.

}, issn = {1879-0445}, doi = {10.1016/j.cub.2013.12.015}, author = {von Philipsborn, Anne C and J{\"o}rchel, Sabrina and Tirian, Laszlo and Demir, Ebru and Morita, Tomoko and Stern, David L and Dickson, Barry J} } @article {47220, title = {Imaging a population code for odor identity in the Drosophila mushroom body.}, journal = {The Journal of Neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience}, volume = {33}, year = {2013}, month = {2013 Jun 19}, pages = {10568-81}, abstract = {

The brain represents sensory information in the coordinated activity of neuronal ensembles. Although the microcircuits underlying olfactory processing are well characterized in Drosophila, no studies to date have examined the encoding of odor identity by populations of neurons and related it to the odor specificity of olfactory behavior. Here we used two-photon Ca(2+) imaging to record odor-evoked responses from \>100 neurons simultaneously in the Drosophila mushroom body (MB). For the first time, we demonstrate quantitatively that MB population responses contain substantial information on odor identity. Using a series of increasingly similar odor blends, we identified conditions in which odor discrimination is difficult behaviorally. We found that MB ensemble responses accounted well for olfactory acuity in this task. Kenyon cell ensembles with as few as 25 cells were sufficient to match behavioral discrimination accuracy. Using a generalization task, we demonstrated that the MB population code could predict the flies{\textquoteright} responses to novel odors. The degree to which flies generalized a learned aversive association to unfamiliar test odors depended upon the relative similarity between the odors{\textquoteright} evoked MB activity patterns. Discrimination and generalization place different demands on the animal, yet the flies{\textquoteright} choices in these tasks were reliably predicted based on the amount of overlap between MB activity patterns. Therefore, these different behaviors can be understood in the context of a single physiological framework.

}, keywords = {Animals, Calcium, Discrimination (Psychology), Drosophila, Generalization (Psychology), Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Learning, Linear Models, Mushroom Bodies, Neuroimaging, Odors, Olfactory Pathways, Olfactory Perception, Psychomotor Performance, Synaptic Transmission}, issn = {1529-2401}, doi = {10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0682-12.2013}, author = {Campbell, Robert A A and Honegger, Kyle S and Qin, Hongtao and Li, Wanhe and Demir, Ebru and Turner, Glenn C} } @article {6862, title = {Cellular organization of the neural circuit that drives Drosophila courtship behavior.}, journal = {Current Biology}, volume = {20}, year = {2010}, month = {2010 Sep 28}, pages = {1602-14}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Courtship behavior in Drosophila has been causally linked to the activity of the heterogeneous set of \~{}1500 neurons that express the sex-specific transcripts of the fruitless (fru) gene, but we currently lack an appreciation of the cellular diversity within this population, the extent to which these cells are sexually dimorphic, and how they might be organized into functional circuits. RESULTS: We used genetic methods to define 100 distinct classes of fru neuron, which we compiled into a digital 3D atlas at cellular resolution. We determined the polarity of many of these neurons and computed their likely patterns of connectivity, thereby assembling them into a neural circuit that extends from sensory input to motor output. The cellular organization of this circuit reveals neuronal pathways in the brain that are likely to integrate multiple sensory cues from other flies and to issue descending control signals to motor circuits in the thoracic ganglia. We identified 11 anatomical dimorphisms within this circuit: neurons that are male specific, are more numerous in males than females, or have distinct arborization patterns in males and females. CONCLUSIONS: The cellular organization of the fru circuit suggests how multiple distinct sensory cues are integrated in the fly{\textquoteright}s brain to drive sex-specific courtship behavior. We propose that sensory processing and motor control are mediated through circuits that are largely similar in males and females. Sex-specific behavior may instead arise through dimorphic circuits in the brain and nerve cord that differentially couple sensory input to motor output.

}, keywords = {Animal, Animals, Brain, Drosophila melanogaster, Female, Male, Nerve Net, Neurons, Sexual Behavior}, issn = {1879-0445}, doi = {10.1016/j.cub.2010.08.025}, author = {Yu, Jai Y and Kanai, Makoto I and Demir, Ebru and Jefferis, Gregory S X E and Dickson, Barry J} }