@article {69633, title = {A Drosophila computational brain model reveals sensorimotor processing.}, journal = {Nature}, volume = {634}, year = {2024}, month = {2024 Oct 02}, pages = {210-219}, abstract = {

The recent assembly of the adult Drosophila melanogaster central brain connectome, containing more than 125,000 neurons and 50 million synaptic connections, provides a template for examining sensory processing throughout the brain. Here we create a leaky integrate-and-fire computational model of the entire Drosophila brain, on the basis of neural connectivity and neurotransmitter identity, to study circuit properties of feeding and grooming behaviours. We show that activation of sugar-sensing or water-sensing gustatory neurons in the computational model accurately predicts neurons that respond to tastes and are required for feeding initiation. In addition, using the model to activate neurons in the feeding region of the Drosophila brain predicts those that elicit motor neuron firing-a testable hypothesis that we validate by optogenetic activation and behavioural studies. Activating different classes of gustatory neurons in the model makes accurate predictions of how several taste modalities interact, providing circuit-level insight into aversive and appetitive taste processing. Additionally, we applied this model to mechanosensory circuits and found that computational activation of mechanosensory neurons predicts activation of a small set of neurons comprising the antennal grooming circuit, and accurately describes the circuit response upon activation of different mechanosensory subtypes. Our results demonstrate that modelling brain circuits using only synapse-level connectivity and predicted neurotransmitter identity generates experimentally testable hypotheses and can describe complete sensorimotor transformations.

}, keywords = {Animals, Brain, Computer Simulation, Connectome, Drosophila melanogaster, Feeding Behavior, Female, Grooming, Male, Models, Neurological, Motor Neurons, Optogenetics, Synapses, Taste}, issn = {1476-4687}, doi = {10.1038/s41586-024-07763-9}, url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07763-9}, author = {Shiu, Philip K and Sterne, Gabriella R and Spiller, Nico and Franconville, Romain and Sandoval, Andrea and Zhou, Joie and Simha, Neha and Kang, Chan Hyuk and Yu, Seongbong and Kim, Jinseop S and Dorkenwald, Sven and Matsliah, Arie and Schlegel, Philipp and Yu, Szi-Chieh and McKellar, Claire E and Sterling, Amy and Costa, Marta and Eichler, Katharina and Bates, Alexander Shakeel and Eckstein, Nils and Funke, Jan and Jefferis, Gregory S X E and Murthy, Mala and Bidaye, Salil S and Hampel, Stefanie and Seeds, Andrew M and Scott, Kristin} } @article {68147, title = {Drosophila gustatory projections are segregated by taste modality and connectivity.}, journal = {eLife}, volume = {11}, year = {2022}, month = {2022 May 25}, abstract = {

Gustatory sensory neurons detect caloric and harmful compounds in potential food and convey this information to the brain to inform feeding decisions. To examine the signals that gustatory neurons transmit and receive, we reconstructed gustatory axons and their synaptic sites in the adult brain, utilizing a whole-brain electron microscopy volume. We reconstructed 87 gustatory projections from the proboscis labellum in the right hemisphere and 57 from the left, representing the majority of labellar gustatory axons. Gustatory neurons contain a nearly equal number of interspersed pre- and postsynaptic sites, with extensive synaptic connectivity among gustatory axons. Morphology- and connectivity-based clustering revealed six distinct groups, likely representing neurons recognizing different taste modalities. The vast majority of synaptic connections are between neurons of the same group. This study resolves the anatomy of labellar gustatory projections, reveals that gustatory projections are segregated based on taste modality, and uncovers synaptic connections that may alter the transmission of gustatory signals.

}, keywords = {Animals, Drosophila, Drosophila melanogaster, Drosophila Proteins, Sensory Receptor Cells, Taste}, issn = {2050-084X}, doi = {10.7554/eLife.78110}, author = {Engert, Stefanie and Sterne, Gabriella R and Bock, Davi D and Scott, Kristin} } @article {68422, title = {Fly Cell Atlas: A single-nucleus transcriptomic atlas of the adult fruit fly.}, journal = {Science}, volume = {375}, year = {2022}, month = {03/2022}, pages = {eabk2432}, abstract = {

For more than 100 years, the fruit fly has been one of the most studied model organisms. Here, we present a single-cell atlas of the adult fly, Tabula , that includes 580,000 nuclei from 15 individually dissected sexed tissues as well as the entire head and body, annotated to \>250 distinct cell types. We provide an in-depth analysis of cell type-related gene signatures and transcription factor markers, as well as sexual dimorphism, across the whole animal. Analysis of common cell types between tissues, such as blood and muscle cells, reveals rare cell types and tissue-specific subtypes. This atlas provides a valuable resource for the community and serves as a reference to study genetic perturbations and disease models at single-cell resolution.

}, keywords = {Animals, Cell Nucleus, Databases, Genetic, Drosophila melanogaster, Drosophila Proteins, Female, Gene Expression Regulation, Gene Regulatory Networks, Genes, Insect, Male, RNA-Seq, Sex Characteristics, Single-Cell Analysis, Transcription Factors, Transcriptome}, issn = {1095-9203}, doi = {10.1126/science.abk2432}, author = {Li, Hongjie and Janssens, Jasper and De Waegeneer, Maxime and Kolluru, Sai Saroja and Davie, Kristofer and Gardeux, Vincent and Saelens, Wouter and David, Fabrice P A and Brbi{\'c}, Maria and Spanier, Katina and Leskovec, Jure and McLaughlin, Colleen N and Xie, Qijing and Jones, Robert C and Brueckner, Katja and Shim, Jiwon and Tattikota, Sudhir Gopal and Schnorrer, Frank and Rust, Katja and Nystul, Todd G and Carvalho-Santos, Zita and Ribeiro, Carlos and Pal, Soumitra and Mahadevaraju, Sharvani and Przytycka, Teresa M and Allen, Aaron M and Goodwin, Stephen F and Berry, Cameron W and Fuller, Margaret T and White-Cooper, Helen and Matunis, Erika L and DiNardo, Stephen and Galenza, Anthony and O{\textquoteright}Brien, Lucy Erin and Dow, Julian A T and Jasper, Heinrich and Oliver, Brian and Perrimon, Norbert and Deplancke, Bart and Quake, Stephen R and Luo, Liqun and Aerts, Stein and Agarwal, Devika and Ahmed-Braimah, Yasir and Arbeitman, Michelle and Ariss, Majd M and Augsburger, Jordan and Ayush, Kumar and Baker, Catherine C and Banisch, Torsten and Birker, Katja and Bodmer, Rolf and Bolival, Benjamin and Brantley, Susanna E and Brill, Julie A and Brown, Nora C and Buehner, Norene A and Cai, Xiaoyu Tracy and Cardoso-Figueiredo, Rita and Casares, Fernando and Chang, Amy and Clandinin, Thomas R and Crasta, Sheela and Desplan, Claude and Detweiler, Angela M and Dhakan, Darshan B and Don{\`a}, Erika and Engert, Stefanie and Floc{\textquoteright}hlay, Swann and George, Nancy and Gonz{\'a}lez-Segarra, Amanda J and Groves, Andrew K and Gumbin, Samantha and Guo, Yanmeng and Harris, Devon E and Heifetz, Yael and Holtz, Stephen L and Horns, Felix and Hudry, Bruno and Hung, Ruei-Jiun and Jan, Yuh Nung and Jaszczak, Jacob S and Jefferis, Gregory S X E and Karkanias, Jim and Karr, Timothy L and Katheder, Nadja Sandra and Kezos, James and Kim, Anna A and Kim, Seung K and Kockel, Lutz and Konstantinides, Nikolaos and Kornberg, Thomas B and Krause, Henry M and Labott, Andrew Thomas and Laturney, Meghan and Lehmann, Ruth and Leinwand, Sarah and Li, Jiefu and Li, Joshua Shing Shun and Li, Kai and Li, Ke and Li, Liying and Li, Tun and Litovchenko, Maria and Liu, Han-Hsuan and Liu, Yifang and Lu, Tzu-Chiao and Manning, Jonathan and Mase, Anjeli and Matera-Vatnick, Mikaela and Matias, Neuza Reis and McDonough-Goldstein, Caitlin E and McGeever, Aaron and McLachlan, Alex D and Moreno-Roman, Paola and Neff, Norma and Neville, Megan and Ngo, Sang and Nielsen, Tanja and O{\textquoteright}Brien, Caitlin E and Osumi-Sutherland, David and Ozel, Mehmet Neset and Papatheodorou, Irene and Petkovic, Maja and Pilgrim, Clare and Pisco, Angela Oliveira and Reisenman, Carolina and Sanders, Erin Nicole and Dos Santos, Gilberto and Scott, Kristin and Sherlekar, Aparna and Shiu, Philip and Sims, David and Sit, Rene V and Slaidina, Maija and Smith, Harold E and Sterne, Gabriella and Su, Yu-Han and Sutton, Daniel and Tamayo, Marco and Tan, Michelle and Tastekin, Ibrahim and Treiber, Christoph and Vacek, David and Vogler, Georg and Waddell, Scott and Wang, Wanpeng and Wilson, Rachel I and Wolfner, Mariana F and Wong, Yiu-Cheung E and Xie, Anthony and Xu, Jun and Yamamoto, Shinya and Yan, Jia and Yao, Zepeng and Yoda, Kazuki and Zhu, Ruijun and Zinzen, Robert P} } @article {67714, title = {Classification and genetic targeting of cell types in the primary taste and premotor center of the adult brain.}, journal = {eLife}, volume = {10}, year = {2021}, month = {2021 Sep 02}, abstract = {

Neural circuits carry out complex computations that allow animals to evaluate food, select mates, move toward attractive stimuli, and move away from threats. In insects, the subesophageal zone (SEZ) is a brain region that receives gustatory, pheromonal, and mechanosensory inputs and contributes to the control of diverse behaviors, including feeding, grooming, and locomotion. Despite its importance in sensorimotor transformations, the study of SEZ circuits has been hindered by limited knowledge of the underlying diversity of SEZ neurons. Here, we generate a collection of split-GAL4 lines that provides precise genetic targeting of 138 different SEZ cell types in adult , comprising approximately one third of all SEZ neurons. We characterize the single cell anatomy of these neurons and find that they cluster by morphology into six supergroups that organize the SEZ into discrete anatomical domains. We find that the majority of local SEZ interneurons are not classically polarized, suggesting rich local processing, whereas SEZ projection neurons tend to be classically polarized, conveying information to a limited number of higher brain regions. This study provides insight into the anatomical organization of the SEZ and generates resources that will facilitate further study of SEZ neurons and their contributions to sensory processing and behavior.

}, issn = {2050-084X}, doi = {10.7554/eLife.71679}, author = {Sterne, Gabriella R and Otsuna, Hideo and Dickson, Barry J and Scott, Kristin} } @article {2363, title = {Receptors, circuits, and behaviors: new directions in chemical senses.}, journal = {The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience}, volume = {28}, year = {2008}, month = {2008 Nov 12}, pages = {11802-5}, abstract = {

The chemical senses, smell and taste, are the most poorly understood sensory modalities. In recent years, however, the field of chemosensation has benefited from new methods and technical innovations that have accelerated the rate of scientific progress. For example, enormous advances have been made in identifying olfactory and gustatory receptor genes and mapping their expression patterns. Genetic tools now permit us to monitor and control neural activity in vivo with unprecedented precision. New imaging techniques allow us to watch neural activity patterns unfold in real time. Finally, improved hardware and software enable multineuron electrophysiological recordings on an expanded scale. These innovations have enabled some fresh approaches to classic problems in chemosensation.

}, keywords = {Afferent Pathways, Animals, Brain, Chemoreceptor Cells, Humans, Odorant, Olfactory Pathways, Olfactory Perception, Receptors, Sensory Receptor Cells, Smell, Taste}, issn = {1529-2401}, doi = {10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3613-08.2008}, author = {Katz, Donald B and Matsunami, Hiroaki and Rinberg, Dmitry and Scott, Kristin and Wachowiak, Matt and Wilson, Rachel I} }