@article {45043, title = {Abdominal-B neurons control Drosophila virgin female receptivity.}, journal = {Current Biology}, volume = {24}, year = {2014}, month = {2014 Jul 21}, pages = {1584-95}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Female sexual receptivity offers an excellent model for complex behavioral decisions. The female must parse her own reproductive state, the external environment, and male sensory cues to decide whether to copulate. In the\ fly Drosophila melanogaster, virgin female receptivity has received relatively little attention, and its neural circuitry and individual behavioral components remain unmapped. Using a genome-wide neuronal RNAi screen, we identify a subpopulation of neurons responsible for pausing, a novel behavioral aspect of virgin female receptivity characterized in this study.

RESULTS: We show that Abdominal-B (Abd-B), a homeobox transcription factor, is required in developing neurons for high levels of virgin female receptivity. Silencing adult Abd-B neurons significantly decreased receptivity. We characterize two components of receptivity that are elicited in sexually mature females by male courtship: pausing and vaginal plate opening. Silencing Abd-B neurons decreased pausing but did not affect vaginal plate opening, demonstrating that these two components of female sexual behavior are functionally separable. Synthetic activation of Abd-B neurons increased pausing, but male courtship song alone was not sufficient to elicit this behavior.

CONCLUSIONS: Our results provide an entry point to the neural circuit controlling virgin female receptivity. The female integrates multiple sensory cues from the male to execute discrete motor programs prior to copulation. Abd-B neurons control pausing, a key aspect of female sexual receptivity, in response to male courtship.

}, issn = {1879-0445}, doi = {10.1016/j.cub.2014.06.011}, author = {Bussell, Jennifer J and Yapici, Nilay and Zhang, Stephen X and Dickson, Barry J and Vosshall, Leslie B} } @article {6884, title = {A systematic nomenclature for the insect brain.}, journal = {Neuron}, volume = {81}, year = {2014}, month = {2014 Feb 19}, pages = {755-65}, abstract = {

Despite the importance of the insect nervous system for functional and developmental neuroscience, descriptions of insect brains have suffered from a lack of uniform nomenclature. Ambiguous definitions of brain regions and fiber bundles have contributed to the variation of names used to describe the same structure. The lack of clearly determined neuropil boundaries has made it difficult to document precise locations of neuronal projections for connectomics study. To address such issues, a consortium of\ neurobiologists studying arthropod brains, the Insect Brain Name Working Group, has established the present hierarchical nomenclature system, using the brain of Drosophila melanogaster as the reference framework, while taking the brains of other taxa into careful consideration for maximum consistency and expandability. The following summarizes the consortium{\textquoteright}s nomenclature system and highlights examples of existing ambiguities and remedies for them. This nomenclature is intended to serve as a\ standard of reference for the study of the brain of Drosophila and other insects.

}, issn = {1097-4199}, doi = {10.1016/j.neuron.2013.12.017}, author = {Ito, Kei and Shinomiya, Kazunori and Ito, Masayoshi and Armstrong, J Douglas and Boyan, George and Hartenstein, Volker and Harzsch, Steffen and Heisenberg, Martin and Homberg, Uwe and Jenett, Arnim and Keshishian, Haig and Restifo, Linda L and R{\"o}ssler, Wolfgang and Simpson, Julie H and Strausfeld, Nicholas J and Strauss, Roland and Vosshall, Leslie B} }