@article {45336, title = {Population of sensory neurons essential for asthmatic hyperreactivity of inflamed airways.}, journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America}, volume = {111}, year = {2014}, month = {2014 Aug 5}, pages = {11515-20}, abstract = {

Asthma is a common debilitating inflammatory lung disease affecting over 200 million people worldwide. Here, we investigated neurogenic components involved in asthmatic-like attacks using the ovalbumin-sensitized murine model of the disease, and identified a specific population of neurons that are required for airway hyperreactivity. We show that ablating or genetically silencing these neurons abolished the hyperreactive broncho-constrictions, even in the presence of a fully developed lung inflammatory immune response. These neurons are found in the vagal ganglia and are characterized by the expression of the transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1) ion channel. However, the TRPV1 channel itself is not required for the asthmatic-like hyperreactive airway response. We also demonstrate that optogenetic stimulation of this population of TRP-expressing cells with channelrhodopsin dramatically exacerbates airway hyperreactivity of inflamed airways. Notably, these cells express the sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 3 (S1PR3), and stimulation with a S1PR3 agonist efficiently induced broncho-constrictions, even in the absence of ovalbumin sensitization and inflammation. Our results show that the airway hyperreactivity phenotype can be physiologically dissociated from the immune component, and provide a platform for devising therapeutic approaches to asthma that target these pathways separately.

}, issn = {1091-6490}, doi = {10.1073/pnas.1411032111}, author = {Tr{\"a}nkner, Dimitri and Hahne, Nadeau and Sugino, Ken and Hoon, Mark A and Zuker, Charles} } @article {1773, title = {The cells and logic for mammalian sour taste detection.}, journal = {Nature}, volume = {442}, year = {2006}, month = {2006 Aug 24}, pages = {934-8}, abstract = {

Mammals taste many compounds yet use a sensory palette consisting of only five basic taste modalities: sweet, bitter, sour, salty and umami (the taste of monosodium glutamate). Although this repertoire may seem modest, it provides animals with critical information about the nature and quality of food. Sour taste detection functions as an important sensory input to warn against the ingestion of acidic (for example, spoiled or unripe) food sources. We have used a combination of bioinformatics, genetic and functional studies to identify PKD2L1, a polycystic-kidney-disease-like ion channel, as a candidate mammalian sour taste sensor. In the tongue, PKD2L1 is expressed in a subset of taste receptor cells distinct from those responsible for sweet, bitter and umami taste. To examine the role of PKD2L1-expressing taste cells in vivo, we engineered mice with targeted genetic ablations of selected populations of taste receptor cells. Animals lacking PKD2L1-expressing cells are completely devoid of taste responses to sour stimuli. Notably, responses to all other tastants remained unaffected, proving that the segregation of taste qualities even extends to ionic stimuli. Our results now establish independent cellular substrates for four of the five basic taste modalities, and support a comprehensive labelled-line mode of taste coding at the periphery. Notably, PKD2L1 is also expressed in specific neurons surrounding the central canal of the spinal cord. Here we demonstrate that these PKD2L1-expressing neurons send projections to the central canal, and selectively trigger action potentials in response to decreases in extracellular pH. We propose that these cells correspond to the long-sought components of the cerebrospinal fluid chemosensory system. Taken together, our results suggest a common basis for acid sensing in disparate physiological settings.

}, keywords = {Action Potentials, Animals, Calcium Channels, Cell Surface, Computational Biology, Gene Expression Profiling, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Membrane Glycoproteins, Mice, Neurons, Phosphoproteins, Receptors, Spinal Cord, Taste, Tongue, Transgenic}, issn = {1476-4687}, doi = {10.1038/nature05084}, author = {Huang, Angela L and Chen, Xiaoke and Hoon, Mark A and Chandrashekar, Jayaram and Guo, Wei and Tr{\"a}nkner, Dimitri and Ryba, Nicholas J P and Zuker, Charles S} } @article {1771, title = {The receptors and cells for mammalian taste.}, journal = {Nature}, volume = {444}, year = {2006}, month = {2006 Nov 16}, pages = {288-94}, abstract = {

The emerging picture of taste coding at the periphery is one of elegant simplicity. Contrary to what was generally believed, it is now clear that distinct cell types expressing unique receptors are tuned to detect each of the five basic tastes: sweet, sour, bitter, salty and umami. Importantly, receptor cells for each taste quality function as dedicated sensors wired to elicit stereotypic responses.

}, keywords = {Animals, G-Protein-Coupled, Humans, Receptors, Signal Transduction, Taste, Taste Buds}, issn = {1476-4687}, doi = {10.1038/nature05401}, author = {Chandrashekar, Jayaram and Hoon, Mark A and Ryba, Nicholas J P and Zuker, Charles S} } @article {1774, title = {The receptors and coding logic for bitter taste.}, journal = {Nature}, volume = {434}, year = {2005}, month = {2005 Mar 10}, pages = {225-9}, abstract = {

The sense of taste provides animals with valuable information about the nature and quality of food. Bitter taste detection functions as an important sensory input to warn against the ingestion of toxic and noxious substances. T2Rs are a family of approximately 30 highly divergent G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) that are selectively expressed in the tongue and palate epithelium and are implicated in bitter taste sensing. Here we demonstrate, using a combination of genetic, behavioural and physiological studies, that T2R receptors are necessary and sufficient for the detection and perception of bitter compounds, and show that differences in T2Rs between species (human and mouse) can determine the selectivity of bitter taste responses. In addition, we show that mice engineered to express a bitter taste receptor in {\textquoteright}sweet cells{\textquoteright} become strongly attracted to its cognate bitter tastants, whereas expression of the same receptor (or even a novel GPCR) in T2R-expressing cells resulted in mice that are averse to the respective compounds. Together these results illustrate the fundamental principle of bitter taste coding at the periphery: dedicated cells act as broadly tuned bitter sensors that are wired to mediate behavioural aversion.

}, keywords = {Animals, Food Preferences, G-Protein-Coupled, Humans, Inbred BALB C, Inbred C57BL, Knockout, Mice, Palate, Physical Stimulation, Receptors, Species Specificity, Substrate Specificity, Taste, Tongue}, issn = {1476-4687}, doi = {10.1038/nature03352}, author = {Mueller, Ken L and Hoon, Mark A and Erlenbach, Isolde and Chandrashekar, Jayaram and Zuker, Charles S and Ryba, Nicholas J P} } @article {1777, title = {Coding of sweet, bitter, and umami tastes: different receptor cells sharing similar signaling pathways.}, journal = {Cell}, volume = {112}, year = {2003}, month = {2003 Feb 7}, pages = {293-301}, abstract = {

Mammals can taste a wide repertoire of chemosensory stimuli. Two unrelated families of receptors (T1Rs and T2Rs) mediate responses to sweet, amino acids, and bitter compounds. Here, we demonstrate that knockouts of TRPM5, a taste TRP ion channel, or PLCbeta2, a phospholipase C selectively expressed in taste tissue, abolish sweet, amino acid, and bitter taste reception, but do not impact sour or salty tastes. Therefore, despite relying on different receptors, sweet, amino acid, and bitter transduction converge on common signaling molecules. Using PLCbeta2 taste-blind animals, we then examined a fundamental question in taste perception: how taste modalities are encoded at the cellular level. Mice engineered to rescue PLCbeta2 function exclusively in bitter-receptor expressing cells respond normally to bitter tastants but do not taste sweet or amino acid stimuli. Thus, bitter is encoded independently of sweet and amino acids, and taste receptor cells are not broadly tuned across these modalities.

}, keywords = {Action Potentials, Afferent, Animals, Cell Membrane, Cell Surface, Cells, Citric Acid, Cultured, Female, Glutamic Acid, GTP-Binding Proteins, Isoenzymes, Knockout, Male, Membrane Proteins, Mice, Neurons, Phospholipase C beta, Quinine, Receptors, Sensory Receptor Cells, Signal Transduction, Sucrose, Taste, Taste Buds, TRPM Cation Channels, Type C Phospholipases}, issn = {0092-8674}, author = {Zhang, Yifeng and Hoon, Mark A and Chandrashekar, Jayaram and Mueller, Ken L and Cook, Boaz and Wu, Dianqing and Zuker, Charles S and Ryba, Nicholas J P} } @article {1776, title = {The receptors for mammalian sweet and umami taste.}, journal = {Cell}, volume = {115}, year = {2003}, month = {2003 Oct 31}, pages = {255-66}, abstract = {

Sweet and umami (the taste of monosodium glutamate) are the main attractive taste modalities in humans. T1Rs are candidate mammalian taste receptors that combine to assemble two heteromeric G-protein-coupled receptor complexes: T1R1+3, an umami sensor, and T1R2+3, a sweet receptor. We now report the behavioral and physiological characterization of T1R1, T1R2, and T1R3 knockout mice. We demonstrate that sweet and umami taste are strictly dependent on T1R-receptors, and show that selective elimination of T1R-subunits differentially abolishes detection and perception of these two taste modalities. To examine the basis of sweet tastant recognition and coding, we engineered animals expressing either the human T1R2-receptor (hT1R2), or a modified opioid-receptor (RASSL) in sweet cells. Expression of hT1R2 in mice generates animals with humanized sweet taste preferences, while expression of RASSL drives strong attraction to a synthetic opiate, demonstrating that sweet cells trigger dedicated behavioral outputs, but their tastant selectivity is determined by the nature of the receptors.

}, keywords = {Animals, Flavoring Agents, G-Protein-Coupled, Gene Deletion, Humans, In Situ Hybridization, kappa, Knockout, Mice, Opioid, Protein Isoforms, Protein Subunits, Receptors, Sodium Glutamate, Sucrose, Taste, Taste Buds}, issn = {0092-8674}, author = {Zhao, Grace Q and Zhang, Yifeng and Hoon, Mark A and Chandrashekar, Jayaram and Erlenbach, Isolde and Ryba, Nicholas J P and Zuker, Charles S} } @article {1778, title = {An amino-acid taste receptor.}, journal = {Nature}, volume = {416}, year = {2002}, month = {2002 Mar 14}, pages = {199-202}, abstract = {

The sense of taste provides animals with valuable information about the nature and quality of food. Mammals can recognize and respond to a diverse repertoire of chemical entities, including sugars, salts, acids and a wide range of toxic substances. Several amino acids taste sweet or delicious (umami) to humans, and are attractive to rodents and other animals. This is noteworthy because L-amino acids function as the building blocks of proteins, as biosynthetic precursors of many biologically relevant small molecules, and as metabolic fuel. Thus, having a taste pathway dedicated to their detection probably had significant evolutionary implications. Here we identify and characterize a mammalian amino-acid taste receptor. This receptor, T1R1+3, is a heteromer of the taste-specific T1R1 and T1R3 G-protein-coupled receptors. We demonstrate that T1R1 and T1R3 combine to function as a broadly tuned L-amino-acid sensor responding to most of the 20 standard amino acids, but not to their D-enantiomers or other compounds. We also show that sequence differences in T1R receptors within and between species (human and mouse) can significantly influence the selectivity and specificity of taste responses.

}, keywords = {Alleles, Amino Acids, Animals, Calcium Signaling, Cell Line, Cell Surface, Chorda Tympani Nerve, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, G-Protein-Coupled, Genetic, Heterotrimeric GTP-Binding Proteins, Humans, Inosine Monophosphate, Mice, Mutation, Polymorphism, Protein Subunits, Receptors, Stereoisomerism, Structure-Activity Relationship, Substrate Specificity, Taste, Taste Buds, Transfection}, issn = {0028-0836}, doi = {10.1038/nature726}, author = {Nelson, Greg and Chandrashekar, Jayaram and Hoon, Mark A and Feng, Luxin and Zhao, Grace and Ryba, Nicholas J P and Zuker, Charles S} }