@article {6897, title = {Procedures for behavioral experiments in head-fixed mice.}, journal = {PLoS One}, volume = {9}, year = {2014}, month = {2014}, pages = {e88678}, abstract = {

The mouse is an increasingly prominent model for the analysis of mammalian neuronal circuits. Neural circuits ultimately have to be probed during behaviors that engage the circuits. Linking circuit dynamics to behavior requires precise control of sensory stimuli and measurement of body movements. Head-fixation has been used for behavioral research, particularly in non-human primates, to facilitate precise stimulus control, behavioral monitoring and neural recording. However, choice-based, perceptual decision tasks by head-fixed mice have only recently been introduced. Training mice relies on motivating mice using water restriction. Here we describe procedures for head-fixation, water restriction and behavioral training for head-fixed mice, with a focus on active, whisker-based tactile behaviors. In these experiments mice had restricted access to water (typically 1 ml/day). After ten days of water restriction, body weight stabilized at approximately 80\% of initial weight. At that point mice were trained to discriminate sensory stimuli using operant conditioning. Head-fixed mice reported stimuli by licking in go/no-go tasks and also using a forced choice paradigm using a dual lickport. In some cases mice learned to discriminate sensory stimuli in a few trials within the first behavioral session. Delay epochs lasting a second or more were used to separate sensation (e.g. tactile exploration) and action (i.e. licking). Mice performed a variety of perceptual decision tasks with high performance for hundreds of trials per behavioral session. Up to four months of continuous water restriction showed no adverse health effects. Behavioral performance correlated with the degree of water restriction, supporting the importance of controlling access to water. These behavioral paradigms can be combined with cellular resolution imaging, random access photostimulation, and whole cell recordings.

}, issn = {1932-6203}, doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0088678}, author = {Guo, Zengcai V and Hires, S Andrew and Li, Nuo and O{\textquoteright}Connor, Daniel H and Komiyama, Takaki and Ophir, Eran and Huber, Daniel and Bonardi, Claudia and Morandell, Karin and Gutnisky, Diego and Peron, Simon and Xu, Ning-long and Cox, James and Svoboda, Karel} } @article {4288, title = {Learning-related fine-scale specificity imaged in motor cortex circuits of behaving mice.}, journal = {Nature}, volume = {464}, year = {2010}, month = {2010 Apr 22}, pages = {1182-6}, abstract = {

Cortical neurons form specific circuits, but the functional structure of this microarchitecture and its relation to behaviour are poorly understood. Two-photon calcium imaging can monitor activity of spatially defined neuronal ensembles in the mammalian cortex. Here we applied this technique to the motor cortex of mice performing a choice behaviour. Head-fixed mice were trained to lick in response to one of two odours, and to withhold licking for the other odour. Mice routinely showed significant learning within the first behavioural session and across sessions. Microstimulation and trans-synaptic tracing identified two non-overlapping candidate tongue motor cortical areas. Inactivating either area impaired voluntary licking. Imaging in layer 2/3 showed neurons with diverse response types in both areas. Activity in approximately half of the imaged neurons distinguished trial types associated with different actions. Many neurons showed modulation coinciding with or preceding the action, consistent with their involvement in motor control. Neurons with different response types were spatially intermingled. Nearby neurons (within approximately 150 mum) showed pronounced coincident activity. These temporal correlations increased with learning within and across behavioural sessions, specifically for neuron pairs with similar response types. We propose that correlated activity in specific ensembles of functionally related neurons is a signature of learning-related circuit plasticity. Our findings reveal a fine-scale and dynamic organization of the frontal cortex that probably underlies flexible behaviour.

}, keywords = {Animal, Animals, Axonal Transport, Behavior, Chemical, Choice Behavior, Inbred C57BL, Learning, Male, Mice, Motor Cortex, Motor Neurons, Neural Pathways, Odors, Pyramidal Cells, Reward, Stimulation, Time Factors, Tongue}, issn = {1476-4687}, doi = {10.1038/nature08897}, author = {Komiyama, Takaki and Sato, Takashi R and O{\textquoteright}Connor, Daniel H and Zhang, Ying-Xin and Huber, Daniel and Hooks, Bryan M and Gabitto, Mariano and Svoboda, Karel} } @article {2329, title = {Vibrissa-based object localization in head-fixed mice.}, journal = {The Journal of Neuroscience}, volume = {30}, year = {2010}, month = {2010 Feb 3}, pages = {1947-67}, abstract = {

Linking activity in specific cell types with perception, cognition, and action, requires quantitative behavioral experiments in genetic model systems such as the mouse. In head-fixed primates, the combination of precise stimulus control, monitoring of motor output, and physiological recordings over large numbers of trials are the foundation on which many conceptually rich and quantitative studies have been built. Choice-based, quantitative behavioral paradigms for head-fixed mice have not been described previously. Here, we report a somatosensory absolute object localization task for head-fixed mice. Mice actively used their mystacial vibrissae (whiskers) to sense the location of a vertical pole presented to one side of the head and reported with licking whether the pole was in a target (go) or a distracter (no-go) location. Mice performed hundreds of trials with high performance (\>90\% correct) and localized to \<0.95 mm (\<6 degrees of azimuthal angle). Learning occurred over 1-2 weeks and was observed both within and across sessions. Mice could perform object localization with single whiskers. Silencing barrel cortex abolished performance to chance levels. We measured whisker movement and shape for thousands of trials. Mice moved their whiskers in a highly directed, asymmetric manner, focusing on the target location. Translation of the base of the whiskers along the face contributed substantially to whisker movements. Mice tended to maximize contact with the go (rewarded) stimulus while minimizing contact with the no-go stimulus. We conjecture that this may amplify differences in evoked neural activity between trial types.

}, keywords = {Animals, Exploratory Behavior, Head Movements, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Movement, Physical, Restraint, Somatosensory Cortex, Space Perception, Touch, Vibrissae}, issn = {1529-2401}, doi = {10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3762-09.2010}, author = {O{\textquoteright}Connor, Daniel H and Clack, Nathan G and Huber, Daniel and Komiyama, Takaki and Myers, Eugene W and Svoboda, Karel} } @article {6250, title = {Lola regulates Drosophila olfactory projection neuron identity and targeting specificity.}, journal = {Neural Development}, volume = {2}, year = {2007}, month = {2007 Jul 16}, pages = {14}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Precise connections of neural circuits can be specified by genetic programming. In the Drosophila olfactory system, projection neurons (PNs) send dendrites to single glomeruli in the antenna lobe (AL) based upon lineage and birth order and send axons with stereotyped terminations to higher olfactory centers. These decisions are likely specified by a PN-intrinsic transcriptional code that regulates the expression of cell-surface molecules to instruct wiring specificity. RESULTS: We find that the loss of longitudinals lacking (lola), which encodes a BTB-Zn-finger transcription factor with 20 predicted splice isoforms, results in wiring defects in both axons and dendrites of all lineages of PNs. RNA in situ hybridization and quantitative RT-PCR suggest that most if not all lola isoforms are expressed in all PNs, but different isoforms are expressed at widely varying levels. Overexpression of individual lola isoforms fails to rescue the lola null phenotypes and causes additional phenotypes. Loss of lola also results in ectopic expression of Gal4 drivers in multiple cell types and in the loss of transcription factor gene lim1 expression in ventral PNs. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that lola is required for wiring of axons and dendrites of most PN classes, and suggest a need for its molecular diversity. Expression pattern changes of Gal4 drivers in lola-/- clones imply that lola normally represses the expression of these regulatory elements in a subset of the cells surrounding the AL. We propose that Lola functions as a general transcription factor that regulates the expression of multiple genes ultimately controlling PN identity and wiring specificity.

}, keywords = {Animals, Body Patterning, Brain, Cell Differentiation, Dendrites, Developmental, Drosophila melanogaster, Drosophila Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Growth Cones, Larva, Olfactory Pathways, Olfactory Receptor Neurons, Regulatory Elements, Transcription Factors, Transcriptional, Transcriptional Activation}, issn = {1749-8104}, doi = {10.1186/1749-8104-2-14}, author = {Spletter, Maria Lynn and Liu, Jian and Liu, Justin and Su, Helen and Giniger, Edward and Komiyama, Takaki and Quake, Stephen and Luo, Liqun} }