@article {47641, title = {Nanotools for neuroscience and brain activity mapping.}, journal = {ACS nano}, volume = {7}, year = {2013}, month = {2013 Mar 26}, pages = {1850-66}, abstract = {

Neuroscience is at a crossroads. Great effort is being invested into deciphering specific neural interactions and circuits. At the same time, there exist few general theories or principles that explain brain function. We attribute this disparity, in part, to limitations in current methodologies. Traditional neurophysiological approaches record the activities of one neuron or a few neurons at a time. Neurochemical approaches focus on single neurotransmitters. Yet, there is an increasing realization that neural circuits operate at emergent levels, where the interactions between hundreds or thousands of neurons, utilizing multiple chemical transmitters, generate functional states. Brains function at the nanoscale, so tools to study brains must ultimately operate at this scale, as well. Nanoscience and nanotechnology are poised to provide a rich toolkit of novel methods to explore brain function by enabling simultaneous measurement and manipulation of activity of thousands or even millions of neurons. We and others refer to this goal as the Brain Activity Mapping Project. In this Nano Focus, we discuss how recent developments in nanoscale analysis tools and in the design and synthesis of nanomaterials have generated optical, electrical, and chemical methods that can readily be adapted for use in neuroscience. These approaches represent exciting areas of technical development and research. Moreover, unique opportunities exist for nanoscientists, nanotechnologists, and other physical scientists and engineers to contribute to tackling the challenging problems involved in understanding the fundamentals of brain function.

}, keywords = {Animals, Brain Mapping, Humans, Models, Neurological, Nanomedicine, Nanoparticles, Nanotechnology, Nervous System Physiological Phenomena}, issn = {1936-086X}, doi = {10.1021/nn4012847}, author = {Alivisatos, A Paul and Andrews, Anne M and Boyden, Edward S and Chun, Miyoung and Church, George M and Deisseroth, Karl and Donoghue, John P and Fraser, Scott E and Lippincott-Schwartz, Jennifer and Looger, Loren L and Masmanidis, Sotiris and McEuen, Paul L and Nurmikko, Arto V and Park, Hongkun and Peterka, Darcy S and Reid, Clay and Roukes, Michael L and Scherer, Axel and Schnitzer, Mark and Sejnowski, Terrence J and Shepard, Kenneth L and Tsao, Doris and Turrigiano, Gina and Weiss, Paul S and Xu, Chris and Yuste, Rafael and Zhuang, Xiaowei} } @article {6130, title = {Nanotools for neuroscience and brain activity mapping.}, journal = {ACS Nano}, volume = {7}, year = {2013}, month = {2013 Mar 26}, pages = {1850-66}, abstract = {

Neuroscience is at a crossroads. Great effort is being invested into deciphering specific neural interactions and circuits. At the same time, there exist few general theories or principles that explain brain function. We attribute this disparity, in part, to limitations in current methodologies. Traditional neurophysiological approaches record the activities of one neuron or a few neurons at a time. Neurochemical approaches focus on single neurotransmitters. Yet, there is an increasing realization that neural circuits operate at emergent levels, where the interactions between hundreds or thousands of neurons, utilizing multiple chemical transmitters, generate functional states. Brains function at the nanoscale, so tools to study brains must ultimately operate at this scale, as well. Nanoscience and nanotechnology are poised to provide a rich toolkit of novel methods to explore brain function by enabling simultaneous measurement and manipulation of activity of thousands or even millions of neurons. We and others refer to this goal as the Brain Activity Mapping Project. In this Nano Focus, we discuss how recent developments in nanoscale analysis tools and in the design and synthesis of nanomaterials have generated optical, electrical, and chemical methods that can readily be adapted for use in neuroscience. These approaches represent exciting areas of technical development and research. Moreover, unique opportunities exist for nanoscientists, nanotechnologists, and other physical scientists and engineers to contribute to tackling the challenging problems involved in understanding the fundamentals of brain function.

}, issn = {1936-086X}, doi = {10.1021/nn4012847}, author = {Alivisatos, A Paul and Andrews, Anne M and Boyden, Edward S and Chun, Miyoung and Church, George M and Deisseroth, Karl and Donoghue, John P and Fraser, Scott E and Lippincott-Schwartz, Jennifer and Looger, Loren L and Masmanidis, Sotiris and McEuen, Paul L and Nurmikko, Arto V and Park, Hongkun and Peterka, Darcy S and Reid, Clay and Roukes, Michael L and Scherer, Axel and Schnitzer, Mark and Sejnowski, Terrence J and Shepard, Kenneth L and Tsao, Doris and Turrigiano, Gina and Weiss, Paul S and Xu, Chris and Yuste, Rafael and Zhuang, Xiaowei} } @article {2197, title = {The challenges of sequencing by synthesis.}, journal = {Nature Biotechnology}, volume = {27}, year = {2009}, month = {2009 Nov}, pages = {1013-23}, abstract = {

DNA sequencing-by-synthesis (SBS) technology, using a polymerase or ligase enzyme as its core biochemistry, has already been incorporated in several second-generation DNA sequencing systems with significant performance. Notwithstanding the substantial success of these SBS platforms, challenges continue to limit the ability to reduce the cost of sequencing a human genome to $100,000 or less. Achieving dramatically reduced cost with enhanced throughput and quality will require the seamless integration of scientific and technological effort across disciplines within biochemistry, chemistry, physics and engineering. The challenges include sample preparation, surface chemistry, fluorescent labels, optimizing the enzyme-substrate system, optics, instrumentation, understanding tradeoffs of throughput versus accuracy, and read-length/phasing limitations. By framing these challenges in a manner accessible to a broad community of scientists and engineers, we hope to solicit input from the broader research community on means of accelerating the advancement of genome sequencing technology.

}, keywords = {Animals, DNA, Fluorescent Dyes, Humans, Optical Phenomena, Sequence Analysis, Substrate Specificity, Surface Properties}, issn = {1546-1696}, doi = {10.1038/nbt0510-426}, author = {Fuller, Carl W and Middendorf, Lyle R and Benner, Steven A and Church, George M and Harris, Timothy and Huang, Xiaohua and Jovanovich, Stevan B and Nelson, John R and Schloss, Jeffery A and Schwartz, David C and Vezenov, Dmitri V} }