@article {6715, title = {Balanced synaptic impact via distance-dependent synapse distribution and complementary expression of AMPARs and NMDARs in hippocampal dendrites.}, journal = {Neuron}, volume = {80}, year = {2013}, month = {2013 Dec 18}, pages = {1451-63}, abstract = {

Neuronal computation involves the integration of synaptic inputs that are often distributed over expansive dendritic trees, suggesting the need for compensatory mechanisms that enable spatially disparate synapses to influence neuronal output. In hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons, such mechanisms have indeed been reported, which normalize either the ability of distributed synapses to drive action potential initiation in the axon or their ability to drive dendritic spiking locally. Here we report that these mechanisms can coexist, through an elegant combination of distance-dependent regulation of synapse number and synaptic expression of AMPA and NMDA receptors. Together, these complementary gradients allow individual dendrites in both the apical and basal dendritic trees of hippocampal neurons to operate as facile computational subunits capable of supporting both global integration in the soma/axon and local integration in the dendrite.

}, issn = {1097-4199}, doi = {10.1016/j.neuron.2013.09.027}, author = {Menon, Vilas and Musial, Timothy F and Liu, Annie and Katz, Yael and Kath, William L and Spruston, Nelson and Nicholson, Daniel A} } @article {6784, title = {Synapse distribution suggests a two-stage model of dendritic integration in CA1 pyramidal neurons.}, journal = {Neuron}, volume = {63}, year = {2009}, month = {2009 Jul 30}, pages = {171-7}, abstract = {

Competing models have been proposed to explain how neurons integrate the thousands of inputs distributed throughout their dendritic trees. In a simple global integration model, inputs from all locations sum in the axon. In a two-stage integration model, inputs contribute directly to dendritic spikes, and outputs from multiple branches sum in the axon. These two models yield opposite predictions of how synapses at different dendritic locations should be scaled if they are to contribute equally to neuronal output. We used serial-section electron microscopy to reconstruct individual apical oblique dendritic branches of CA1 pyramidal neurons and observe a synapse distribution consistent with the two-stage integration model. Computational modeling suggests that the observed synapse distribution enhances the contribution of each dendritic branch to neuronal output.

}, keywords = {Animals, Dendrites, Electron, Hippocampus, Humans, Microscopy, Models, Neural Networks (Computer), Neural Pathways, Neurological, Neurons, Synapses}, issn = {1097-4199}, doi = {10.1016/j.neuron.2009.06.023}, author = {Katz, Yael and Menon, Vilas and Nicholson, Daniel A and Geinisman, Yuri and Kath, William L and Spruston, Nelson} } @article {45909, title = {Distance-dependent differences in synapse number and AMPA receptor expression in hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons.}, journal = {Neuron}, volume = {50}, year = {2006}, month = {2006 May 4}, pages = {431-42}, abstract = {

The ability of synapses throughout the dendritic tree to influence neuronal output is crucial for information processing in the brain. Synaptic potentials attenuate dramatically, however, as they propagate along dendrites toward the soma. To examine whether excitatory axospinous synapses on CA1 pyramidal neurons compensate for their distance from the soma to counteract such dendritic filtering, we evaluated axospinous synapse number and receptor expression in three progressively distal regions: proximal and distal stratum radiatum (SR), and stratum lacunosum-moleculare (SLM). We found that the proportion of perforated synapses increases as a function of distance from the soma and that their AMPAR, but not NMDAR, expression is highest in distal SR and lowest in SLM. Computational models of pyramidal neurons derived from these results suggest that they arise from the compartment-specific use of conductance scaling in SR and dendritic spikes in SLM to minimize the influence of distance on synaptic efficacy.

}, keywords = {Animals, Cell Polarity, Cell Shape, Crosses, Genetic, Dendritic Spines, Excitatory Postsynaptic Potentials, Glutamic Acid, Hippocampus, Image Cytometry, Immunohistochemistry, Male, Microscopy, Electron, Transmission, Perforant Pathway, Presynaptic Terminals, Pyramidal Cells, Rats, Rats, Inbred BN, Rats, Inbred F344, Receptors, AMPA, Synapses, Synaptic Transmission}, issn = {0896-6273}, doi = {10.1016/j.neuron.2006.03.022}, author = {Nicholson, Daniel A and Trana, Rachel and Katz, Yael and Kath, William L and Spruston, Nelson and Geinisman, Yuri} }