@article {70243, title = {The organization of visual pathways in the Drosophila brain}, journal = {bioRxiv}, year = {2025}, month = {2025 Dec 26}, abstract = {

Visual systems across species transform photoreceptor inputs into diverse perceptual representations through hierarchical networks that extract features via parallel pathways. In Drosophila, the optic lobes are layered, retinotopic visual processing centers that contain two-thirds of the brain{\textquoteright}s neurons and support diverse visually guided behaviors. Although this architecture has long suggested hierarchical and parallel organization, a system-wide account of how behaviorally relevant visual features are routed and integrated across a complete visual system{\textemdash}in any animal{\textemdash}has remained elusive. The new male fly connectome now provides the synapse-level wiring needed to trace visual information from photoreceptors through the optic lobes and across the central brain. Applying a network-based analysis of information flow, we reveal a multi-layered architecture organized into distinct, functionally interpretable pathways. Using this framework to propagate signals through these pathways predicts receptive-field structure and feature selectivity consistent with physiological data, enabling large-scale functional annotation of thousands of neuron types. We find that distinct visual input channels are broadly distributed throughout the brain, yet converge in focal regions of feature specificity and acute spatial vision. Together, these analyses provide a neuron-level, connectome-based view of how a brain organizes and transforms visual input.

}, doi = {10.64898/2025.12.22.696097}, url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2025/12/26/2025.12.22.696097}, author = {Hoeller, Judith and Zhao, Arthur and Nern, Aljoscha and Rogers, Edward M and Romani, Sandro and Reiser, Michael B} } @article {70155, title = {Sexual dimorphism in the complete connectome of the Drosophila male central nervous system}, journal = {bioRxiv}, year = {2025}, month = {2025 Oct 09}, abstract = {

Sex differences in behaviour exist across the animal kingdom, typically under strong genetic regulation. In Drosophila, previous work has shown that fruitless and doublesex transcription factors identify neurons driving sexually dimorphic behaviour. However, the organisation of dimorphic neurons into functional circuits remains unclear.We now present the connectome of the entire Drosophila male central nervous system. This contains 166,691 neurons spanning the brain and ventral nerve cord, fully proofread and comprehensively annotated including fruitless and doublesex expression and 11,691 cell types. By comparison with a previous female brain connectome, we provide the first comprehensive description of the differences between male and female brains to synaptic resolution. Of 7,319 cross-matched cell types in the central brain, 114 are dimorphic with an additional 262 male- and 69 female-specific (totalling 4.8\% of neurons in males and 2.4\% in females).This resource enables analysis of full sensory-to-motor circuits underlying complex behaviours as well as the impact of dimorphic elements. Sex-specific and dimorphic neurons are concentrated in higher brain centres while the sensory and motor periphery are largely isomorphic. Within higher centres, male-specific connections are organised into hotspots defined by male-specific neurons or the presence of male-specific arbours on neurons that are otherwise similar between sexes. Numerous circuit switches reroute sensory information to form conserved, antagonistic circuits controlling opposing behaviours.

}, doi = {10.1101/2025.10.09.680999}, url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2025/10/09/2025.10.09.680999}, author = {Berg, Stuart and Beckett, Isabella R and Costa, Marta and Schlegel, Philipp and Januszewski, Micha{\l} and Marin, Elizabeth C and Nern, Aljoscha and Preibisch, Stephan and Qiu, Wei and Takemura, Shin-ya and Fragniere, Alexandra MC and Champion, Andrew S and Adjavon, Diane-Yayra and Cook, Michael and Gkantia, Marina and Hayworth, Kenneth J and Huang, Gary B and Katz, William T and K{\"a}mpf, Florian and Lu, Zhiyuan and Ordish, Christopher and Paterson, Tyler and St{\"u}rner, Tomke and Trautman, Eric T and Whittle, Catherine R and Burnett, Laura E and Hoeller, Judith and Li, Feng and Loesche, Frank and Morris, Billy J and Pietzsch, Tobias and Pleijzier, Markus W and Silva, Valeria and Yin, Yijie and Ali, Iris and Badalamente, Griffin and Bates, Alexander Shakeel and Bogovic, John and Brooks, Paul and Cachero, Sebastian and Canino, Brandon S and Chaisrisawatsuk, Bhumpanya and Clements, Jody and Crowe, Arthur and de Haan Vicente, In{\^e}s and Dempsey, Georgia and Don{\`a}, Erika and dos Santos, M{\'a}rcia and Dreher, Marisa and Dunne, Christopher R and Eichler, Katharina and Finley-May, Samantha and Flynn, Miriam A and Hameed, Imran and Hopkins, Gary Patrick and Hubbard, Philip M and Kiassat, Ladann and Kovalyak, Julie and Lauchie, Shirley A and Leonard, Meghan and Lohff, Alanna and Longden, Kit D and Maldonado, Charli A and Mitletton, Myrto and Moitra, Ilina and Moon, Sung Soo and Mooney, Caroline and Munnelly, Eva J and Okeoma, Nneoma and Olbris, Donald J and Pai, Anika and Patel, Birava and Phillips, Emily M and Plaza, Stephen M and Richards, Alana and Rivas Salinas, Jennifer and Roberts, Ruair{\'\i} Jv and Rogers, Edward M and Scott, Ashley L and Scuderi, Louis A and Seenivasan, Pavithraa and Serratosa Capdevila, Laia and Smith, Claire and Svirskas, Rob and Takemura, Satoko and Tastekin, Ibrahim and Thomson, Alexander and Umayam, Lowell and Walsh, John J and Whittome, Holly and Xu, C Shan and Yakal, Emily A and Yang, Tansy and Zhao, Arthur and George, Reed and Jain, Viren and Jayaraman, Vivek and Korff, Wyatt and Meissner, Geoffrey W and Romani, Sandro and Funke, Jan and Knecht, Christopher and Saalfeld, Stephan and Scheffer, Louis K and Waddell, Scott and Card, Gwyneth M and Ribeiro, Carlos and Reiser, Michael B and Hess, Harald F and Rubin, Gerald M and Jefferis, Gregory Sxe} } @article {69092, title = {Different spectral sensitivities of ON- and OFF-motion pathways enhance the detection of approaching color objects in Drosophila.}, journal = {Nature Communications}, volume = {14}, year = {2023}, month = {2023 Nov 24}, pages = {7693}, abstract = {

Color and motion are used by many species to identify salient objects. They are processed largely independently, but color contributes to motion processing in humans, for example, enabling moving colored objects to be detected when their luminance matches the background. Here, we demonstrate an unexpected, additional contribution of color to motion vision in Drosophila. We show that behavioral ON-motion responses are more sensitive to UV than for OFF-motion, and we identify cellular pathways connecting UV-sensitive R7 photoreceptors to ON and OFF-motion-sensitive T4 and T5 cells, using neurogenetics and calcium imaging. Remarkably, this contribution of color circuitry to motion vision enhances the detection of approaching UV discs, but not green discs with the same chromatic contrast, and we show how this could generalize for systems with ON- and OFF-motion pathways. Our results provide a computational and circuit basis for how color enhances motion vision to favor the detection of saliently colored objects.

}, keywords = {Animals, Drosophila, Humans, Motion Perception, Photoreceptor Cells, Vision, Ocular}, issn = {2041-1723}, doi = {10.1038/s41467-023-43566-8}, author = {Longden, Kit D and Rogers, Edward M and Nern, Aljoscha and Dionne, Heather and Reiser, Michael B} } @article {69111, title = {Different spectral sensitivities of ON- and OFF-motion pathways enhance the detection of approaching color objects in Drosophila.}, journal = {Nature Communications}, volume = {14}, year = {2023}, month = {2023 Nov 24}, pages = {7693}, abstract = {

Color and motion are used by many species to identify salient objects. They are processed largely independently, but color contributes to motion processing in humans, for example, enabling moving colored objects to be detected when their luminance matches the background. Here, we demonstrate an unexpected, additional contribution of color to motion vision in Drosophila. We show that behavioral ON-motion responses are more sensitive to UV than for OFF-motion, and we identify cellular pathways connecting UV-sensitive R7 photoreceptors to ON and OFF-motion-sensitive T4 and T5 cells, using neurogenetics and calcium imaging. Remarkably, this contribution of color circuitry to motion vision enhances the detection of approaching UV discs, but not green discs with the same chromatic contrast, and we show how this could generalize for systems with ON- and OFF-motion pathways. Our results provide a computational and circuit basis for how color enhances motion vision to favor the detection of saliently colored objects.

}, keywords = {Animals, Drosophila, Humans, Motion Perception, Photoreceptor Cells, Vision, Ocular}, issn = {2041-1723}, doi = {10.1038/s41467-023-43566-8}, author = {Longden, Kit D and Rogers, Edward M and Nern, Aljoscha and Dionne, Heather and Reiser, Michael B} } @article {67952, title = {A functionally ordered visual feature map in the Drosophila brain.}, journal = {Neuron}, volume = {110}, year = {2022}, month = {2022 May 18}, pages = {1700}, abstract = {

Topographic maps, the systematic spatial ordering of neurons by response tuning, are common across species. In Drosophila, the lobula columnar (LC) neuron types project from the optic lobe to the central brain, where each forms a glomerulus in a distinct position. However, the advantages of this glomerular arrangement are unclear. Here, we examine the functional and spatial relationships of 10 glomeruli using single-neuron calcium imaging. We discover novel detectors for objects smaller than the lens resolution (LC18) and for complex line motion (LC25). We find that glomeruli are spatially clustered by selectivity for looming versus drifting object motion and ordered by size tuning to form a topographic visual feature map. Furthermore, connectome analysis shows that downstream neurons integrate from sparse subsets of possible glomeruli combinations, which are biased for glomeruli encoding similar features. LC neurons are thus an explicit example of distinct feature detectors topographically organized to facilitate downstream circuit integration.

}, issn = {1097-4199}, doi = {10.1016/j.neuron.2022.02.013}, author = {Klapoetke, Nathan C and Nern, Aljoscha and Rogers, Edward M and Rubin, Gerald M and Reiser, Michael B and Card, Gwyneth M} } @article {65847, title = {Spatial readout of visual looming in the central brain of Drosophila.}, journal = {eLife}, volume = {9}, year = {2020}, month = {2020 Nov 18}, abstract = {

Visual systems can exploit spatial correlations in the visual scene by using retinotopy. However, retinotopy is often lost, such as when visual pathways are integrated with other sensory modalities. How is spatial information processed outside of strictly visual brain areas? Here, we focused on visual looming responsive LC6 cells in , a population whose dendrites collectively cover the visual field, but whose axons form a single glomerulus-a structure without obvious retinotopic organization-in the central brain. We identified multiple cell types downstream of LC6 in the glomerulus and found that they more strongly respond to looming in different portions of the visual field, unexpectedly preserving spatial information. Through EM reconstruction of all LC6 synaptic inputs to the glomerulus, we found that LC6 and downstream cell types form circuits within the glomerulus that enable spatial readout of visual features and contralateral suppression-mechanisms that transform visual information for behavioral control.

}, issn = {2050-084X}, doi = {10.7554/eLife.57685}, author = {Morimoto, Mai M and Nern, Aljoscha and Zhao, Arthur and Rogers, Edward M and Wong, Allan and Isaacson, Mathew D and Bock, Davi and Rubin, Gerald M and Reiser, Michael B} } @article {48982, title = {Behavioral state modulates the ON visual motion pathway of Drosophila.}, journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America}, volume = {115}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 Dec 18}, pages = {E102-11}, abstract = {

The behavioral state of an animal can dynamically modulate visual processing. In flies, the behavioral state is known to alter the temporal tuning of neurons that carry visual motion information into the central brain. However, where this modulation occurs and how it tunes the properties of this neural circuit are not well understood. Here, we show that the behavioral state alters the baseline activity levels and the temporal tuning of the first directionally selective neuron in the ON motion pathway (T4) as well as its primary input neurons (Mi1, Tm3, Mi4, Mi9). These effects are especially prominent in the inhibitory neuron Mi4, and we show that central octopaminergic neurons provide input to Mi4 and increase its excitability. We further show that octopamine neurons are required for sustained behavioral responses to fast-moving, but not slow-moving, visual stimuli in walking flies. These results indicate that behavioral-state modulation acts directly on the inputs to the directionally selective neurons and supports efficient neural coding of motion stimuli.

}, issn = {1091-6490}, doi = {10.1073/pnas.1703090115}, author = {Strother, James A and Wu, Shiuan-Tze and Rogers, Edward M and Eliason, Jessica L M and Wong, Allan M and Nern, Aljoscha and Reiser, Michael B} } @article {48414, title = {The emergence of directional selectivity in the visual motion pathway of Drosophila.}, journal = {Neuron}, volume = {94}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 Apr 05}, pages = {168-182.e10}, abstract = {

The perception of visual motion is critical for animal navigation, and flies are a prominent model system for exploring this neural computation. In Drosophila, the T4 cells of the medulla are directionally selective and necessary for ON motion behavioral responses. To examine the emergence of directional selectivity, we developed genetic driver lines for the neuron types with the most synapses onto T4 cells. Using calcium imaging, we found that these neuron types are not directionally selective and that selectivity arises in the T4 dendrites. By silencing each input neuron type, we identified which neurons are necessary for T4 directional selectivity and ON motion behavioral responses. We then determined the sign of the connections between these neurons and T4 cells using neuronal photoactivation. Our results indicate a computational architecture for motion detection that is a hybrid of classic theoretical models.

}, issn = {1097-4199}, doi = {10.1016/j.neuron.2017.03.010}, author = {Strother, James A and Wu, Shiuan-Tze and Wong, Allan M and Nern, Aljoscha and Rogers, Edward M and Le, Jasmine Q and Rubin, Gerald M and Reiser, Michael B} } @article {48934, title = {Ultra-selective looming detection from radial motion opponency.}, journal = {Nature}, volume = {551}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 Nov 08}, pages = {237-241}, abstract = {

Nervous systems combine lower-level sensory signals to detect higher-order stimulus features critical to survival, such as the visual looming motion created by an imminent collision or approaching predator. Looming-sensitive neurons have been identified in diverse animal species. Different large-scale visual features such as looming often share local cues, which means loom-detecting neurons face the challenge of rejecting confounding stimuli. Here we report the discovery of an ultra-selective looming detecting neuron, lobula plate/lobula columnar, type II (LPLC2) in Drosophila, and show how its selectivity is established by radial motion opponency. In the fly visual system, directionally selective small-field neurons called T4 and T5 form a spatial map in the lobula plate, where they each terminate in one of four retinotopic layers, such that each layer responds to motion in a different cardinal direction. Single-cell anatomical analysis reveals that each arm of the LPLC2 cross-shaped primary dendrites ramifies in one of these layers and extends along that layer{\textquoteright}s preferred motion direction. In vivo calcium imaging demonstrates that, as their shape predicts, individual LPLC2 neurons respond strongly to outward motion emanating from the centre of the neuron{\textquoteright}s receptive field. Each dendritic arm also receives local inhibitory inputs directionally selective for inward motion opposing the excitation. This radial motion opponency generates a balance of excitation and inhibition that makes LPLC2 non-responsive to related patterns of motion such as contraction, wide-field rotation or luminance change. As a population, LPLC2 neurons densely cover visual space and terminate onto the giant fibre descending neurons, which drive the jump muscle motor neuron to trigger an escape take off. Our findings provide a mechanistic description of the selective feature detection that flies use to discern and escape looming threats.

}, issn = {1476-4687}, doi = {10.1038/nature24626}, author = {Klapoetke, Nathan C and Nern, Aljoscha and Peek, Martin Y and Rogers, Edward M and Breads, Patrick and Rubin, Gerald M and Reiser, Michael B and Card, Gwyneth M} }