@article {65899, title = {The connectome of the adult mushroom body provides insights into function.}, journal = {eLife}, volume = {9}, year = {2020}, month = {2020 Dec 14}, abstract = {

Making inferences about the computations performed by neuronal circuits from synapse-level connectivity maps is an emerging opportunity in neuroscience. The mushroom body (MB) is well positioned for developing and testing such an approach due to its conserved neuronal architecture, recently completed dense connectome, and extensive prior experimental studies of its roles in learning, memory and activity regulation. Here we identify new components of the MB circuit in , including extensive visual input and MB output neurons (MBONs) with direct connections to descending neurons. We find unexpected structure in sensory inputs, in the transfer of information about different sensory modalities to MBONs, and in the modulation of that transfer by dopaminergic neurons (DANs). We provide insights into the circuitry used to integrate MB outputs, connectivity between the MB and the central complex and inputs to DANs, including feedback from MBONs. Our results provide a foundation for further theoretical and experimental work.

}, issn = {2050-084X}, doi = {10.7554/eLife.62576}, author = {Li, Feng and Lindsey, Jack W and Marin, Elizabeth C and Otto, Nils and Dreher, Marisa and Dempsey, Georgia and Stark, Ildiko and Bates, Alexander S and Pleijzier, Markus William and Schlegel, Philipp and Nern, Aljoscha and Takemura, Shin-ya and Eckstein, Nils and Yang, Tansy and Francis, Audrey and Braun, Amalia and Parekh, Ruchi and Costa, Marta and Scheffer, Louis K and Aso, Yoshi and Jefferis, Gregory Sxe and Abbott, Larry F and Litwin-Kumar, Ashok and Waddell, Scott and Rubin, Gerald M} } @article {65314, title = {Input connectivity reveals additional heterogeneity of dopaminergic reinforcement in Drosophila}, journal = {Current Biology}, volume = {30}, year = {2020}, month = {2020 Aug 17}, pages = {3200-11}, abstract = {

Different types of\ Drosophila\ dopaminergic neurons (DANs) reinforce memories of unique valence and provide state-dependent motivational control [1]. Prior studies suggest that the compartment architecture of the mushroom body (MB) is the relevant resolution for distinct DAN functions [2,\ 3]. Here we used a recent electron microscope volume of the fly brain [4] to reconstruct the fine anatomy of individual DANs within three MB compartments. We find the 20 DANs of the γ5 compartment, at least some of which provide reward teaching signals, can be clustered into 5 anatomical subtypes that innervate different regions within γ5. Reconstructing 821 upstream neurons reveals input selectivity, supporting the functional relevance of DAN sub-classification. Only one PAM-γ5 DAN subtype (γ5fb) receives direct recurrent input from γ5β{\textquoteright}2a mushroom body output neurons (MBONs) and behavioral experiments distinguish a role for these DANs in memory revaluation from those reinforcing sugar memory. Other DAN subtypes receive major, and potentially reinforcing, inputs from putative gustatory interneurons or lateral horn neurons, which can also relay indirect feedback from the MB. We similarly reconstructed the single aversively reinforcing PPL1-γ1pedc DAN. The γ1pedc DAN inputs are mostly different to those of γ5 DANs and are clustered onto distinct branches of its dendritic tree, presumably separating its established roles in aversive reinforcement and appetitive motivation [5,\ 6]. Additional tracing identified neurons that provide broad input to γ5, β{\textquoteright}2a and γ1pedc DANs suggesting that distributed DAN populations can be coordinately regulated. These connectomic and behavioral analyses therefore reveal additional complexity of dopaminergic reinforcement circuits between and within MB compartments.

}, author = {Otto, Nils and Pleijzier, Markus W. and Morgan, Isabel C. and Edmondson-Stait, Amelia J and Heinz, Konrad J. and Stark, Ildiko and Dempsey, Georgia and Ito, Masayoshi and Kapoor, Ishaan and Hsu, Joseph and Schlegel, Philipp M. and Bates, Alexander S. and Costa, Marta and Ito, Kei and Bock, Davi D. and Rubin, Gerald M. and Jefferis, Gregory S.X.E. and Waddell, Scott} } @article {49435, title = {Integration of parallel opposing memories underlies memory extinction.}, journal = {Cell}, volume = {175}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 Sep 06}, pages = {709-22}, abstract = {

Accurately predicting an outcome requires that animals learn supporting and conflicting evidence from sequential experience. In mammals and invertebrates, learned fear responses can be suppressed by experiencing predictive cues without punishment,\ a process called memory extinction. Here, we show that extinction of aversive memories in Drosophila requires specific dopaminergic neurons, which indicate that omission of punishment is remembered as a positive experience. Functional imaging revealed co-existence of intracellular calcium traces in different places in the mushroom body output neuron network for both the original aversive memory and a new appetitive extinction memory. Light and ultrastructural anatomy are consistent with parallel competing memories being combined within mushroom body output neurons that direct avoidance. Indeed, extinction-evoked plasticity in a pair of these neurons neutralizes the potentiated odor response imposed in the network by aversive learning. Therefore, flies track the accuracy of learned expectations by accumulating and integrating memories of conflicting events.

}, issn = {1097-4172}, doi = {10.1016/j.cell.2018.08.021}, author = {Felsenberg, Johannes and Jacob, Pedro F and Walker, Thomas and Barnstedt, Oliver and Edmondson-Stait, Amelia J and Pleijzier, Markus W and Otto, Nils and Schlegel, Philipp and Sharifi, Nadiya and Perisse, Emmanuel and Smith, Carlas S and Lauritzen, J Scott and Costa, Marta and Jefferis, Gregory S X E and Bock, Davi D and Waddell, Scott} } @article {48642, title = {The Ol1mpiad: concordance of behavioural faculties of stage 1 and stage 3 Drosophila larvae.}, journal = {The Journal of Experimental Biology}, volume = {220}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 Jul 01}, pages = {2452-2475}, abstract = {

Mapping brain function to brain structure is a fundamental task for neuroscience. For such an endeavour, the Drosophila larva is simple enough to be tractable, yet complex enough to be interesting. It features about 10,000 neurons and is capable of various taxes, kineses and Pavlovian conditioning. All its neurons are currently being mapped into a light-microscopical atlas, and Gal4 strains are being generated to experimentally access neurons one at a time. In addition, an electron microscopic reconstruction of its nervous system seems within reach. Notably, this electron microscope-based connectome is being drafted for a stage 1 larva - because stage 1 larvae are much smaller than stage 3 larvae. However, most behaviour analyses have been performed for stage 3 larvae because their larger size makes them easier to handle and observe. It is therefore warranted to either redo the electron microscopic reconstruction for a stage 3 larva or to survey the behavioural faculties of stage 1 larvae. We provide the latter. In a community-based approach we called the Ol1mpiad, we probed stage 1 Drosophila larvae for free locomotion, feeding, responsiveness to substrate vibration, gentle and nociceptive touch, burrowing, olfactory preference and thermotaxis, light avoidance, gustatory choice of various tastants plus odour-taste associative learning, as well as light/dark-electric shock associative learning. Quantitatively, stage 1 larvae show lower scores in most tasks, arguably because of their smaller size and lower speed. Qualitatively, however, stage 1 larvae perform strikingly similar to stage 3 larvae in almost all cases. These results bolster confidence in mapping brain structure and behaviour across developmental stages.

}, issn = {1477-9145}, doi = {10.1242/jeb.156646}, author = {Almeida-Carvalho, Maria J and Berh, Dimitri and Braun, Andreas and Chen, Yi-chun and Eichler, Katharina and Eschbach, Claire and Fritsch, Pauline M J and Gerber, Bertram and Hoyer, Nina and Jiang, Xiaoyi and Kleber, J{\"o}rg and Kl{\"a}mbt, Christian and K{\"o}nig, Christian and Louis, Matthieu and Michels, Birgit and Miroschnikow, Anton and Mirth, Christen and Miura, Daisuke and Niewalda, Thomas and Otto, Nils and Paisios, Emmanouil and Pankratz, Michael J and Petersen, Meike and Ramsperger, Noel and Randel, Nadine and Risse, Benjamin and Saumweber, Timo and Schlegel, Philipp and Schleyer, Michael and Soba, Peter and Sprecher, Simon G and Tanimura, Teiichi and Thum, Andreas S and Toshima, Naoko and Truman, Jim W and Yarali, Ayse and Zlatic, Marta} }