@article {65635,
	title = {Structure of human GABA receptor in an inactive state.},
	journal = {Nature},
	volume = {584},
	year = {2020},
	month = {2020 Aug 01},
	pages = {304-9},
	abstract = {<p>The human GABA receptor-a member of the class C family of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs)-mediates inhibitory neurotransmission and has been implicated in epilepsy, pain and addiction. A unique GPCR that is known to require heterodimerization for function, the GABA receptor has two subunits, GABA and GABA, that are structurally homologous but perform distinct and complementary functions. GABA recognizes orthosteric ligands, while GABA couples with G proteins. Each subunit is characterized by an extracellular Venus flytrap (VFT) module, a descending peptide linker, a seven-helix transmembrane domain and a cytoplasmic tail. Although the VFT heterodimer structure has been resolved, the structure of the full-length receptor and its transmembrane signalling mechanism remain unknown. Here we present a near full-length structure of the GABA receptor at atomic resolution, captured in an inactive state by cryo-electron microscopy. Our structure reveals several ligands that preassociate with the receptor, including two large endogenous phospholipids that are embedded within the transmembrane domains to maintain receptor integrity and modulate receptor function. We also identify a previously unknown heterodimer interface between transmembrane helices 3 and 5 of both subunits, which serves as a signature of the inactive conformation. A unique {\textquoteright}intersubunit latch{\textquoteright} within this transmembrane interface maintains the inactive state, and its disruption leads to constitutive receptor activity.</p>
},
	issn = {1476-4687},
	doi = {10.1038/s41586-020-2452-0},
	author = {Park, Jinseo and Fu, Ziao and Frangaj, Aurel and Liu, Jonathan and Mosyak, Lidia and Shen, Tong and Slavkovich, Vesna N and Ray, Kimberly M and Taura, Jaume and Cao, Baohua and Geng, Yong and Zuo, Hao and Kou, Yongjun and Grassucci, Robert and Chen, Shaoxia and Liu, Zheng and Lin, Xin and Williams, Justin P and Rice, William J and Eng, Edward T and Huang, Rick K and Soni, Rajesh K and Kloss, Brian and Yu, Zhiheng and Javitch, Jonathan A and Hendrickson, Wayne A and Slesinger, Paul A and Quick, Matthias and Graziano, Joseph and Yu, Hongtao and Fiehn, Oliver and Clarke, Oliver B and Frank, Joachim and Fan, Qing R}
}
@article {48715,
	title = {Best practices for managing large CryoEM facilities.},
	journal = {Journal of Structural Biology},
	volume = {199},
	year = {2017},
	month = {2017-08-04},
	pages = {225-36},
	abstract = {<p>This paper provides an overview of the discussion and presentations from the Workshop on the Management of Large CryoEM Facilities held at the New York Structural Biology Center, New York, NY on February 6{\textendash}7, 2017. A major objective of the workshop was to discuss best practices for managing cryoEM facilities. The discussions were largely focused on supporting single-particle methods for cryoEM and topics included: user access, assessing projects, workflow, sample handling, microscopy, data management and processing, and user training.</p>
},
	doi = {10.1016/j.jsb.2017.07.011},
	author = {Alewijnse, Bart and Ashton, Alun W and Chambers, Melissa G and Chen, Songye and Cheng, Anchi and Ebrahim, Mark and Eng, Edward T and Hagen, Wim JH and Koster, Abraham J and Lopez, Claudia S and Lukoyanova, Natalya and Ortega, Joaquin and Renault, Ludovic and Reyntjens, Steve and Rice, William J and Scapin, Giovanna and Schrijver, Raymond and Siebert, Alistair and Stagg, Scott M and et al}
}
