@article {70047, title = {Distributed control circuits across a brain-and-cord connectome}, journal = {bioRxiv}, year = {2025}, month = {2025 Aug 02}, abstract = {

Just as genomes revolutionized molecular genetics, connectomes (maps of neurons and synapses) are transforming neuroscience. To date, the only species with complete connectomes are worms\ and sea squirts\ (103-104 synapses). By contrast, the fruit fly is more complex (108 synaptic connections), with a brain that supports learning and spatial memory and an intricate ventral nerve cord analogous to the vertebrate spinal cord. Here we report the first adult fly connectome that unites the brain and ventral nerve cord, and we leverage this resource to investigate principles of neural control. We show that effector cells (motor neurons, endocrine cells and efferent neurons targeting the viscera) are primarily influenced by local sensory cells in the same body part, forming local feedback loops. These local loops are linked by long-range circuits involving ascending and descending neurons organized into behavior-centric modules. Single ascending and descending neurons are often positioned to influence the voluntary movements of multiple body parts, together with endocrine cells or visceral organs that support those movements. Brain regions involved in learning and navigation supervise these circuits. These results reveal an architecture that is distributed, parallelized and embodied (tightly connected to effectors), reminiscent of distributed control architectures in engineered systems.

}, doi = {10.1101/2025.07.31.667571}, url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2025/08/02/2025.07.31.667571}, author = {Bates, Alexander Shakeel and Phelps, Jasper S. and Kim, Minsu and Yang, Helen H. and Matsliah, Arie and Ajabi, Zaki and Perlman, Eric and Delgado, Kevin M. and Osman, Mohammed Abdal Monium and Salmon, Christopher K. and Gager, Jay and Silverman, Benjamin and Renauld, Sophia and Collie, Matthew F. and Fan, Jingxuan and Pacheco, Diego A. and Zhao, Yunzhi and Patel, Janki and Zhang, Wenyi and Serratosa Capdevilla, Laia and Roberts, Ruair{\'\i} J.V. and Munnelly, Eva J. and Griggs, Nina and Langley, Helen and Moya-Llamas, Borja and Maloney, Ryan T. and Yu, Szi-Chieh and Sterling, Amy R. and Sorek, Marissa and Kruk, Krzysztof and Serafetinidis, Nikitas and Dhawan, Serene and St{\"u}rner, Tomke and Klemm, Finja and Brooks, Paul and Lesser, Ellen and Jones, Jessica M. and Pierce-Lundgren, Sara E. and Lee, Su-Yee and Luo, Yichen and Cook, Andrew P. and McKim, Theresa H. and Kophs, Emily C. and Falt, Tjalda and Negr{\'o}n Morales, Alexa M. and Burke, Austin and Hebditch, James and Willie, Kyle P. and Willie, Ryan and Popovych, Sergiy and Kemnitz, Nico and Ih, Dodam and Lee, Kisuk and Lu, Ran and Halageri, Akhilesh and Bae, J. Alexander and Jourdan, Ben and Schwartzman, Gregory and Demarest, Damian D. and Behnke, Emily and Bland, Doug and Kristiansen, Anne and Skelton, Jaime and Stocks, Tom and Garner, Dustin and Salman, Farzaan and Daly, Kevin C. and Hernandez, Anthony and Kumar, Sandeep and The BANC-FlyWire Consortium and Dorkenwald, Sven and Collman, Forrest and Suver, Marie P. and Fenk, Lisa M. and Pankratz, Michael J. and Jefferis, Gregory S.X.E. and Eichler, Katharina and Seeds, Andrew M. and Hampel, Stefanie and Agrawal, Sweta and Zandawala, Meet and Macrina, Thomas and Adjavon, Diane-Yayra and Funke, Jan and Tuthill, John C. and Azevedo, Anthony and Seung, H. Sebastian and de Bivort, Benjamin L. and Murthy, Mala and Drugowitsch, Jan and Wilson, Rachel I. and Lee, Wei-Chung Allen} } @article {70155, title = {Sexual dimorphism in the complete connectome of the Drosophila male central nervous system}, journal = {bioRxiv}, year = {2025}, month = {2025 Oct 09}, abstract = {

Sex differences in behaviour exist across the animal kingdom, typically under strong genetic regulation. In Drosophila, previous work has shown that fruitless and doublesex transcription factors identify neurons driving sexually dimorphic behaviour. However, the organisation of dimorphic neurons into functional circuits remains unclear.We now present the connectome of the entire Drosophila male central nervous system. This contains 166,691 neurons spanning the brain and ventral nerve cord, fully proofread and comprehensively annotated including fruitless and doublesex expression and 11,691 cell types. By comparison with a previous female brain connectome, we provide the first comprehensive description of the differences between male and female brains to synaptic resolution. Of 7,319 cross-matched cell types in the central brain, 114 are dimorphic with an additional 262 male- and 69 female-specific (totalling 4.8\% of neurons in males and 2.4\% in females).This resource enables analysis of full sensory-to-motor circuits underlying complex behaviours as well as the impact of dimorphic elements. Sex-specific and dimorphic neurons are concentrated in higher brain centres while the sensory and motor periphery are largely isomorphic. Within higher centres, male-specific connections are organised into hotspots defined by male-specific neurons or the presence of male-specific arbours on neurons that are otherwise similar between sexes. Numerous circuit switches reroute sensory information to form conserved, antagonistic circuits controlling opposing behaviours.

}, doi = {10.1101/2025.10.09.680999}, url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2025/10/09/2025.10.09.680999}, author = {Berg, Stuart and Beckett, Isabella R and Costa, Marta and Schlegel, Philipp and Januszewski, Micha{\l} and Marin, Elizabeth C and Nern, Aljoscha and Preibisch, Stephan and Qiu, Wei and Takemura, Shin-ya and Fragniere, Alexandra MC and Champion, Andrew S and Adjavon, Diane-Yayra and Cook, Michael and Gkantia, Marina and Hayworth, Kenneth J and Huang, Gary B and Katz, William T and K{\"a}mpf, Florian and Lu, Zhiyuan and Ordish, Christopher and Paterson, Tyler and St{\"u}rner, Tomke and Trautman, Eric T and Whittle, Catherine R and Burnett, Laura E and Hoeller, Judith and Li, Feng and Loesche, Frank and Morris, Billy J and Pietzsch, Tobias and Pleijzier, Markus W and Silva, Valeria and Yin, Yijie and Ali, Iris and Badalamente, Griffin and Bates, Alexander Shakeel and Bogovic, John and Brooks, Paul and Cachero, Sebastian and Canino, Brandon S and Chaisrisawatsuk, Bhumpanya and Clements, Jody and Crowe, Arthur and de Haan Vicente, In{\^e}s and Dempsey, Georgia and Don{\`a}, Erika and dos Santos, M{\'a}rcia and Dreher, Marisa and Dunne, Christopher R and Eichler, Katharina and Finley-May, Samantha and Flynn, Miriam A and Hameed, Imran and Hopkins, Gary Patrick and Hubbard, Philip M and Kiassat, Ladann and Kovalyak, Julie and Lauchie, Shirley A and Leonard, Meghan and Lohff, Alanna and Longden, Kit D and Maldonado, Charli A and Mitletton, Myrto and Moitra, Ilina and Moon, Sung Soo and Mooney, Caroline and Munnelly, Eva J and Okeoma, Nneoma and Olbris, Donald J and Pai, Anika and Patel, Birava and Phillips, Emily M and Plaza, Stephen M and Richards, Alana and Rivas Salinas, Jennifer and Roberts, Ruair{\'\i} Jv and Rogers, Edward M and Scott, Ashley L and Scuderi, Louis A and Seenivasan, Pavithraa and Serratosa Capdevila, Laia and Smith, Claire and Svirskas, Rob and Takemura, Satoko and Tastekin, Ibrahim and Thomson, Alexander and Umayam, Lowell and Walsh, John J and Whittome, Holly and Xu, C Shan and Yakal, Emily A and Yang, Tansy and Zhao, Arthur and George, Reed and Jain, Viren and Jayaraman, Vivek and Korff, Wyatt and Meissner, Geoffrey W and Romani, Sandro and Funke, Jan and Knecht, Christopher and Saalfeld, Stephan and Scheffer, Louis K and Waddell, Scott and Card, Gwyneth M and Ribeiro, Carlos and Reiser, Michael B and Hess, Harald F and Rubin, Gerald M and Jefferis, Gregory Sxe} } @article {69633, title = {A Drosophila computational brain model reveals sensorimotor processing.}, journal = {Nature}, volume = {634}, year = {2024}, month = {2024 Oct 02}, pages = {210-219}, abstract = {

The recent assembly of the adult Drosophila melanogaster central brain connectome, containing more than 125,000 neurons and 50 million synaptic connections, provides a template for examining sensory processing throughout the brain. Here we create a leaky integrate-and-fire computational model of the entire Drosophila brain, on the basis of neural connectivity and neurotransmitter identity, to study circuit properties of feeding and grooming behaviours. We show that activation of sugar-sensing or water-sensing gustatory neurons in the computational model accurately predicts neurons that respond to tastes and are required for feeding initiation. In addition, using the model to activate neurons in the feeding region of the Drosophila brain predicts those that elicit motor neuron firing-a testable hypothesis that we validate by optogenetic activation and behavioural studies. Activating different classes of gustatory neurons in the model makes accurate predictions of how several taste modalities interact, providing circuit-level insight into aversive and appetitive taste processing. Additionally, we applied this model to mechanosensory circuits and found that computational activation of mechanosensory neurons predicts activation of a small set of neurons comprising the antennal grooming circuit, and accurately describes the circuit response upon activation of different mechanosensory subtypes. Our results demonstrate that modelling brain circuits using only synapse-level connectivity and predicted neurotransmitter identity generates experimentally testable hypotheses and can describe complete sensorimotor transformations.

}, keywords = {Animals, Brain, Computer Simulation, Connectome, Drosophila melanogaster, Feeding Behavior, Female, Grooming, Male, Models, Neurological, Motor Neurons, Optogenetics, Synapses, Taste}, issn = {1476-4687}, doi = {10.1038/s41586-024-07763-9}, url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07763-9}, author = {Shiu, Philip K and Sterne, Gabriella R and Spiller, Nico and Franconville, Romain and Sandoval, Andrea and Zhou, Joie and Simha, Neha and Kang, Chan Hyuk and Yu, Seongbong and Kim, Jinseop S and Dorkenwald, Sven and Matsliah, Arie and Schlegel, Philipp and Yu, Szi-Chieh and McKellar, Claire E and Sterling, Amy and Costa, Marta and Eichler, Katharina and Bates, Alexander Shakeel and Eckstein, Nils and Funke, Jan and Jefferis, Gregory S X E and Murthy, Mala and Bidaye, Salil S and Hampel, Stefanie and Seeds, Andrew M and Scott, Kristin} } @article {68889, title = {Neuronal wiring diagram of an adult brain.}, journal = {Nature}, volume = {634}, year = {2024}, month = {2024 Oct 02}, pages = {124-138}, abstract = {

Connections between neurons can be mapped by acquiring and analysing electron microscopic brain images. In recent years, this approach has been applied to chunks of brains to reconstruct local connectivity maps that are highly informative, but nevertheless inadequate for understanding brain function more globally. Here we present a neuronal wiring diagram of a whole brain containing 5 {\texttimes} 107 chemical synapses between 139,255 neurons reconstructed from an adult female Drosophila melanogaster. The resource also incorporates annotations of cell classes and types, nerves, hemilineages and predictions of neurotransmitter identities. Data products are available for download, programmatic access and interactive browsing and have been made interoperable with other fly data resources. We derive a projectome-a map of projections between regions-from the connectome and report on tracing of synaptic pathways and the analysis of information flow from inputs (sensory and ascending neurons) to outputs (motor, endocrine and descending neurons) across both hemispheres and between the central brain and the optic lobes. Tracing from a subset of photoreceptors to descending motor pathways illustrates how structure can uncover putative circuit mechanisms underlying sensorimotor behaviours. The technologies and open ecosystem reported here set the stage for future large-scale connectome projects in other species.

}, doi = {10.1038/s41586-024-07558-y}, url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07558-y}, author = {Dorkenwald, Sven and Matsliah, Arie and Sterling, Amy R and Schlegel, Philipp and Yu, Szi-Chieh and McKellar, Claire E and Lin, Albert and Costa, Marta and Eichler, Katharina and Yin, Yijie and Silversmith, Will and Schneider-Mizell, Casey and Jordan, Chris S and Brittain, Derrick and Halageri, Akhilesh and Kuehner, Kai and Ogedengbe, Oluwaseun and Morey, Ryan and Gager, Jay and Kruk, Krzysztof and Perlman, Eric and Yang, Runzhe and Deutsch, David and Bland, Doug and Sorek, Marissa and Lu, Ran and Macrina, Thomas and Lee, Kisuk and Bae, J Alexander and Mu, Shang and Nehoran, Barak and Mitchell, Eric and Popovych, Sergiy and Wu, Jingpeng and Jia, Zhen and Castro, Manuel and Kemnitz, Nico and Ih, Dodam and Bates, Alexander Shakeel and Eckstein, Nils and Funke, Jan and Collman, Forrest and Bock, Davi D and Jefferis, Gregory S X E and Seung, H Sebastian and Murthy, Mala} } @article {69439, title = {Neurotransmitter classification from electron microscopy images at synaptic sites in Drosophila melanogaster}, journal = {Cell}, volume = {187}, year = {2024}, month = {2024 May 09}, pages = {2574-2594.e23}, abstract = {

High-resolution electron microscopy of nervous systems has enabled the reconstruction of synaptic connectomes. However, we do not know the synaptic sign for each connection (i.e., whether a connection is excitatory or inhibitory), which is implied by the released transmitter. We demonstrate that artificial neural networks can predict transmitter types for presynapses from electron micrographs: a network trained to predict six transmitters (acetylcholine, glutamate, GABA, serotonin, dopamine, octopamine) achieves an accuracy of 87\% for individual synapses, 94\% for neurons, and 91\% for known cell types across a D.\ melanogaster whole brain. We visualize the ultrastructural features used for prediction, discovering subtle but significant differences between transmitter phenotypes. We also analyze transmitter distributions across the brain and find that neurons that develop together largely express only one fast-acting transmitter (acetylcholine, glutamate, or GABA). We hope that our publicly available predictions act as an accelerant for neuroscientific hypothesis generation for the fly.

}, keywords = {Animals, Brain, Connectome, Drosophila melanogaster, gamma-Aminobutyric Acid, Microscopy, Electron, Neural Networks, Computer, Neurons, Neurotransmitter Agents, Synapses}, issn = {1097-4172}, doi = {10.1016/j.cell.2024.03.016}, author = {Eckstein, Nils and Bates, Alexander Shakeel and Champion, Andrew and Du, Michelle and Yin, Yijie and Schlegel, Philipp and Lu, Alicia Kun-Yang and Rymer, Thomson and Finley-May, Samantha and Paterson, Tyler and Parekh, Ruchi and Dorkenwald, Sven and Matsliah, Arie and Yu, Szi-Chieh and McKellar, Claire and Sterling, Amy and Eichler, Katharina and Costa, Marta and Seung, Sebastian and Murthy, Mala and Hartenstein, Volker and Jefferis, Gregory S X E and Funke, Jan} } @article {67303, title = {Information flow, cell types and stereotypy in a full olfactory connectome.}, journal = {eLife}, volume = {10}, year = {2021}, month = {2021 May 25}, abstract = {

The connectome provides large scale connectivity and morphology information for the majority of the central brain of . Using this data set, we provide a complete description of the olfactory system, covering all first, second and lateral horn-associated third-order neurons. We develop a generally applicable strategy to extract information flow and layered organisation from connectome graphs, mapping olfactory input to descending interneurons. This identifies a range of motifs including highly lateralised circuits in the antennal lobe and patterns of convergence downstream of the mushroom body and lateral horn. Leveraging a second data set we provide a first quantitative assessment of inter- versus intra-individual stereotypy. Comparing neurons across two brains (three hemispheres) reveals striking similarity in neuronal morphology across brains. Connectivity correlates with morphology and neurons of the same morphological type show similar connection variability within the same brain as across two brains.

}, issn = {2050-084X}, doi = {10.7554/eLife.66018}, author = {Schlegel, Philipp and Bates, Alexander Shakeel and St{\"u}rner, Tomke and Jagannathan, Sridhar R and Drummond, Nikolas and Hsu, Joseph and Serratosa Capdevila, Laia and Javier, Alexandre and Marin, Elizabeth C and Barth-Maron, Asa and Tamimi, Imaan Fm and Li, Feng and Rubin, Gerald M and Plaza, Stephen M and Costa, Marta and Jefferis, Gregory Sxe} } @article {64934, title = {Functional and anatomical specificity in a higher olfactory centre.}, journal = {Elife}, volume = {8}, year = {2019}, month = {2019 May 21}, abstract = {

Most sensory systems are organized into parallel neuronal pathways that process distinct aspects of incoming stimuli. In the insect olfactory system, second order projection neurons target both the mushroom body, required for learning, and the lateral horn (LH), proposed to mediate innate olfactory behavior. Mushroom body neurons form a sparse olfactory population code, which is not stereotyped across animals. In contrast, odor coding in the LH remains poorly understood. We combine genetic driver lines, anatomical and functional criteria to show that the LH has ~1400 neurons and \>165 cell types. Genetically labeled LHNs have stereotyped odor responses across animals and on average respond to three times more odors than single projection neurons. LHNs are better odor categorizers than projection neurons, likely due to stereotyped pooling of related inputs. Our results reveal some of the principles by which a higher processing area can extract innate behavioral significance from sensory stimuli.

}, issn = {2050-084X}, doi = {10.7554/eLife.44590}, author = {Frechter, Shahar and Bates, Alexander Shakeel and Tootoonian, Sina and Dolan, Michael-John and Manton, James D and Jamasb, Arian Rokkum and Kohl, Johannes and Bock, Davi and Jefferis, Gregory Sxe} } @article {64933, title = {Neurogenetic dissection of the lateral horn reveals major outputs, diverse behavioural functions, and interactions with the mushroom body.}, journal = {Elife}, volume = {8}, year = {2019}, month = {2019 May 21}, abstract = {

Animals exhibit innate behaviours to a variety of sensory stimuli including olfactory cues. In , one higher olfactory centre, the lateral horn (LH), is implicated in innate behaviour. However, our structural and functional understanding of the LH is scant, in large part due to a lack of sparse neurogenetic tools for this region. We generate a collection of split-GAL4 driver lines providing genetic access to 82 LH cell types. We use these to create an anatomical and neurotransmitter map of the LH and link this to EM connectomics data. We find ~30\% of LH projections converge with outputs from the mushroom body, site of olfactory learning and memory. Using optogenetic activation, we identify LH cell types that drive changes in valence behavior or specific locomotor programs. In summary, we have generated a resource for manipulating and mapping LH neurons, providing new insights into the circuit basis of innate and learned olfactory behavior.

}, issn = {2050-084X}, doi = {10.7554/eLife.43079}, author = {Dolan, Michael-John and Frechter, Shahar and Bates, Alexander Shakeel and Dan, Chuntao and Huoviala, Paavo and Roberts, Ruair{\'\i} Jv and Schlegel, Philipp and Dhawan, Serene and Tabano, Remy and Dionne, Heather and Christoforou, Christina and Close, Kari and Sutcliffe, Ben and Giuliani, Bianca and Li, Feng and Costa, Marta and Ihrke, Gudrun and Meissner, Geoffrey Wilson and Bock, Davi D and Aso, Yoshinori and Rubin, Gerald M and Jefferis, Gregory Sxe} } @article {49434, title = {Communication from learned to innate olfactory processing centers is required for memory retrieval in Drosophila.}, journal = {Neuron}, volume = {100}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 Sep 19}, pages = {651-68}, abstract = {

The behavioral response to a sensory stimulus may depend on both learned and innate neuronal representations. How these circuits interact to produce appropriate behavior is unknown. In Drosophila, the lateral horn (LH) and mushroom body (MB) are thought to mediate innate and learned olfactory behavior, respectively, although LH function has not been tested directly. Here we identify two LH cell types (PD2a1 and PD2b1) that receive input from an MB output neuron required for recall of aversive olfactory memories. These neurons are required for aversive memory retrieval and modulated by training. Connectomics data demonstrate that PD2a1 and PD2b1 neurons also receive direct input from food odor-encoding neurons. Consistent with this, PD2a1 and PD2b1 are also necessary for unlearned attraction to some odors, indicating that these neurons have a dual behavioral role. This provides a circuit mechanism by which learned and innate olfactory information can interact in identified neurons to produce appropriate behavior.

}, issn = {1097-4199}, doi = {10.1016/j.neuron.2018.08.037}, author = {Dolan, Michael-John and Belliart-Gu{\'e}rin, Ghislain and Bates, Alexander Shakeel and Frechter, Shahar and Lampin-Saint-Amaux, Aur{\'e}lie and Aso, Yoshinori and Roberts, Ruair{\'\i} J V and Schlegel, Philipp and Wong, Allan and Hammad, Adnan and Bock, Davi and Rubin, Gerald M and Preat, Thomas and Placais, Pierre-Yves and Jefferis, Gregory S X E} }