@article {65896,
	title = {In situ differentiation of iridophore crystallotypes underlies zebrafish stripe patterning.},
	journal = {Nature Communications},
	volume = {11},
	year = {2020},
	month = {2020 Dec 15},
	pages = {6391},
	abstract = {<p>Skin color patterns are ubiquitous in nature, impact social behavior, predator avoidance, and protection from ultraviolet irradiation. A leading model system for vertebrate skin patterning is the zebrafish; its alternating blue stripes and yellow interstripes depend on light-reflecting cells called iridophores. It was suggested that the zebrafish{\textquoteright}s color pattern arises from a single type of iridophore migrating differentially to stripes and interstripes. However, here we find that iridophores do not migrate between stripes and interstripes but instead differentiate and proliferate in-place, based on their micro-environment. RNA-sequencing analysis further reveals that stripe and interstripe iridophores have different transcriptomic states, while cryogenic-scanning-electron-microscopy and micro-X-ray diffraction identify different crystal-arrays architectures, indicating that stripe and interstripe iridophores are different cell types. Based on these results, we present an alternative model of skin patterning in zebrafish in which distinct iridophore crystallotypes containing specialized, physiologically responsive, organelles arise in stripe and interstripe by in-situ differentiation.</p>
},
	keywords = {Animals, Cell Differentiation, Cell Proliferation, Chromatophores, Microphthalmia-Associated Transcription Factor, Mutagenesis, Skin, Skin Pigmentation, Transcriptome, X-Ray Diffraction, Zebrafish, Zebrafish Proteins},
	issn = {2041-1723},
	doi = {10.1038/s41467-020-20088-1},
	author = {Gur, Dvir and Bain, Emily J and Johnson, Kory R and Aman, Andy J and Pasoili, H Amalia and Flynn, Jessica D and Allen, Michael C and Deheyn, Dimitri D and Lee, Jennifer C and Lippincott-Schwartz, Jennifer and Parichy, David M}
}
@article {64959,
	title = {Fate plasticity and reprogramming in genetically distinct populations of  leucophores.},
	journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America},
	volume = {116},
	year = {2019},
	month = {2019 Jun 11},
	pages = {11806-11},
	abstract = {<p>Understanding genetic and cellular bases of adult form remains a fundamental goal at the intersection of developmental and evolutionary biology. The skin pigment cells of vertebrates, derived from embryonic neural crest, are a useful system for elucidating mechanisms of fate specification, pattern formation, and how particular phenotypes impact organismal behavior and ecology. In a survey of fishes, including the zebrafish , we identified two populations of white pigment cells-leucophores-one of which arises by transdifferentiation of adult melanophores and another of which develops from a yellow-orange xanthophore or xanthophore-like progenitor. Single-cell transcriptomic, mutational, chemical, and ultrastructural analyses of zebrafish leucophores revealed cell-type-specific chemical compositions, organelle configurations, and genetic requirements. At the organismal level, we identified distinct physiological responses of leucophores during environmental background matching, and we showed that leucophore complement influences behavior. Together, our studies reveal independently arisen pigment cell types and mechanisms of fate acquisition in zebrafish and illustrate how concerted analyses across hierarchical levels can provide insights into phenotypes and their evolution.</p>
},
	issn = {1091-6490},
	doi = {10.1073/pnas.1901021116},
	author = {Lewis, Victor M and Saunders, Lauren M and Larson, Tracy A and Bain, Emily J and Sturiale, Samantha L and Gur, Dvir and Chowdhury, Sarwat and Flynn, Jessica D and Allen, Michael C and Deheyn, Dimitri D and Lee, Jennifer C and Simon, Julian A and Lippincott-Schwartz, Jennifer and Raible, David W and Parichy, David M}
}
